The Final One (F1) - Bachelorette 9 - Spoilers - Discussion

Kashathediva wrote:

treschicas wrote:Ariela....the 5 sources could be wrong if they are all from the same source, or if some are made up. or if the each source has a single source telling them the wrong thing.

I agree with you, I really do and think this way often--but
I don't think they are...
a) I am as firmly resolved as the others that came out and said they felt their sources were rock solid (even though it could still happen  ),
but more so
b) tptb need it to be right. I have heard so many unspoiled viewers come out to say that if Des takes Brooks back fill in the blank with some not nice words and opinions regarding Des because I am not going to. Not going to open that can.  
This would explain moving the MTN up a week. This would explain the pretty much controlled set of the ATFR. This might explain any groveling we see re--Brooks tomorrow night. This would explain the dumpster fire wordage and the trainwreck that MF loves. Nice tight package delivered.

nd4reality wrote:

Kashathediva wrote:

treschicas wrote:Ariela....the 5 sources could be wrong if they are all from the same source, or if some are made up. or if the each source has a single source telling them the wrong thing.

I agree with you, I really do and think this way often--but
I don't think they are...
a) I am as firmly resolved as the others that came out and said they felt their sources were rock solid (even though it could still happen  ),
but more so
b) tptb need it to be right. I have heard so many unspoiled viewers come out to say that if Des takes Brooks back fill in the blank with some not nice words and opinions regarding Des because I am not going to. Not going to open that can.  
This would explain moving the MTN up a week. This would explain the pretty much controlled set of the ATFR. This might explain any groveling we see re--Brooks tomorrow night. This would explain the dumpster fire wordage and the trainwreck that MF loves. Nice tight package delivered.

Well I believe the people posting the information and their sources BUT their sources could all be duped in the first place. The source is possibly 1 and not multiple anyway.

My first clue would be that 3 sources `confirmed`that Des and Brooks are `still happy and together using exactly the same words.  Huge red flag and  I probably missed the discussion on here but damn ! How can that be just ignored.
:skeptic: 

On the eve of the Finale and folks are still determined to read the spoilers and ignore the real life after-the-show signs make any fake-out that MF has laid for sleuths and spoiled folks genius.

All the   is completely ignored.  Tomorrow should be amazing !

I fear the boards will be :atomic:  tomorrow I truly do.

The Bachelorette Finale Part 2 2013: Desiree Hartsock and Brooks Forester Engaged In Love and Together http://t.co/AxESnxzdIv via @sharethis

— Celeb Dirty Laundry (@celebdirtylaund) August 4, 2013

rosesrREd wrote:

treschicas wrote:Ariela....the 5 sources could be wrong if they are all from the same source, or if some are made up. or if the each source has a single source telling them the wrong thing.

I agree.  Those 5 people who have confirmed their source has told them so, could be the same source.  I doubt there are different sources for these people who spoil.  They are probably one in the same.

sde1041 wrote:I am afraid that some people only stick to the spoilers whatever happens during the show or after. Blindsided. A monkey could be spoiled F1 that some would find a way to explain it and maintain that the sources say so... I am sorry folks, but I believe it's very reasonable to keep asking questions despite "the sources". Not God words anyway ???  :hidingchair

ImeldaMarcos wrote:

Piper61 wrote:

ImeldaMarcos wrote:

Piper61 wrote:

Ariela wrote:

Piper61 wrote:Is this not a discussion thread? The F1 Spoilers Discussion thread?

Why do we have to classify people as fangirly, haters, realists, sleuthers in these discussions?  Why not just skip over something that you might not agree with and don't feel like discussing if it's going to lead to labeling or on a downward spiral?


We don't share the same opinions all of the time, and we don't view things the same way.  Offering up a different point of view, and standing firm with it is discussing/expressing.  I try to be polite, and if it doesn't come across as polite then I regret that.  But at times it feels like there is a type of bullying that goes on.

In this thread, is discussing the spoilers for F1 and voicing excitement over that not allowed or acceptable discussion?  Is snarking, bashing, and being negative or whatever someone wants to call it the only acceptable forms of expression here?

And you're picking a fight because.....?


I find it easier to state or analyze my point of view without worrying what others think about me.

I'm not picking a fight...that's your misconception.  Am I not allowed to make observations, ask questions?  

:WAVEY: Pretty sure by the rules of this board you are!   

I appreciate you're telling me, yet I am not certain what rule I broke. I will move on from it.

Piper, nononono. I meant you were allowed to speak your opinion by the rules of the board. I am so sorry I did not communicate my thoughts well. I was supporting your statement~ 

treschicas wrote:Imelda...what are these sources saying that proves Brooks is F1...have they seen pictures or is it just someone's word? I'm just curious cuz all these spoilers say Brooks is F1 but there is no evidence or proof of it.

Piper61 wrote:

ImeldaMarcos wrote:

Piper61 wrote:

ImeldaMarcos wrote:

Piper61 wrote:

Ariela wrote:

Piper61 wrote:Is this not a discussion thread? The F1 Spoilers Discussion thread?

Why do we have to classify people as fangirly, haters, realists, sleuthers in these discussions?  Why not just skip over something that you might not agree with and don't feel like discussing if it's going to lead to labeling or on a downward spiral?


We don't share the same opinions all of the time, and we don't view things the same way.  Offering up a different point of view, and standing firm with it is discussing/expressing.  I try to be polite, and if it doesn't come across as polite then I regret that.  But at times it feels like there is a type of bullying that goes on.

In this thread, is discussing the spoilers for F1 and voicing excitement over that not allowed or acceptable discussion?  Is snarking, bashing, and being negative or whatever someone wants to call it the only acceptable forms of expression here?

And you're picking a fight because.....?


I find it easier to state or analyze my point of view without worrying what others think about me.

I'm not picking a fight...that's your misconception.  Am I not allowed to make observations, ask questions?  

:WAVEY: Pretty sure by the rules of this board you are!   

I appreciate you're telling me, yet I am not certain what rule I broke. I will move on from it.

Piper, nononono. I meant you were allowed to speak your opinion by the rules of the board. I am so sorry I did not communicate my thoughts well. I was supporting your statement~ 

Talk about a misconception, I sure had one!   Thank you for taking the time to set that straight.  

Goldie2 wrote:

rosesrREd wrote:

treschicas wrote:Ariela....the 5 sources could be wrong if they are all from the same source, or if some are made up. or if the each source has a single source telling them the wrong thing.

I agree.  Those 5 people who have confirmed their source has told them so, could be the same source.  I doubt there are different sources for these people who spoil.  They are probably one in the same.

Everyone has their own people they go to for information-
They are not one in the same.
I am very confident in knowing where my information came from or i would not post it ever- nor would the others I'm sure.

This spoiler has been out all season . All sources are doing now is confirming their status -
that they are still together and happy.
Extremely unlikely these independent sources would ALL be wrong - including the mags and RS.
To my knowledge their hasn't been one source that is saying Chris or Drew are F1.

The reason being is because they aren't - it's Brooks. Not trying to dash anyone's hopes -
just trying to keep it real.

julychild wrote:

nd4reality wrote:

Kashathediva wrote:

treschicas wrote:Ariela....the 5 sources could be wrong if they are all from the same source, or if some are made up. or if the each source has a single source telling them the wrong thing.

I agree with you, I really do and think this way often--but
I don't think they are...
a) I am as firmly resolved as the others that came out and said they felt their sources were rock solid (even though it could still happen  ),
but more so
b) tptb need it to be right. I have heard so many unspoiled viewers come out to say that if Des takes Brooks back fill in the blank with some not nice words and opinions regarding Des because I am not going to. Not going to open that can.  
This would explain moving the MTN up a week. This would explain the pretty much controlled set of the ATFR. This might explain any groveling we see re--Brooks tomorrow night. This would explain the dumpster fire wordage and the trainwreck that MF loves. Nice tight package delivered.

Well I believe the people posting the information and their sources BUT their sources could all be duped in the first place. The source is possibly 1 and not multiple anyway.

My first clue would be that 3 sources `confirmed`that Des and Brooks are `still happy and together using exactly the same words.  Huge red flag and  I probably missed the discussion on here but damn ! How can that be just ignored.
:skeptic: 

On the eve of the Finale and folks are still determined to read the spoilers and ignore the real life after-the-show signs make any fake-out that MF has laid for sleuths and spoiled folks genius.

All the   is completely ignored.  Tomorrow should be amazing !

I fear the boards will be :atomic:  tomorrow I truly do.

I haven't paid a lot of attention to the new spoilers, but this has been all over twitter for a couple of days. Were the new spoilers worded like this?

The Bachelorette Finale Part 2 2013: Desiree Hartsock and Brooks Forester Engaged In Love and Together http://t.co/AxESnxzdIv via @sharethis

— Celeb Dirty Laundry (@celebdirtylaund) August 4, 2013

sydney1 wrote:Remember Roberto it was like he dropped off the face of the earth. If it had not been for a poster who worked for State Farm who saw that he had applied for an insurance license in CA it would have been the same as Brooks.  And believe me Ali was everywhere. .....