SELECT CONTENT

The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1

Page 36 of 47 Previous  1 ... 19 ... 35, 36, 37 ... 41 ... 47  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1 - Page 36 Empty Re: The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1

Post by Guest Sat Apr 06, 2013 6:00 pm

noobsleuth wrote:IDK ... maybe this all just proves my point that the relationship isn't as healthy as they are making it out to be. I don't think Sean is gay ... but I do think he cares about his image therefore caring about whatever marketable qualities he might have. If the celibate thing sells, then that is what he's going to go with (or at least his agents or telling him to do so). I can't blame him for the man that he is. IMO he wants $$$ (who doesn't) and his celibacy is what's making the headlines. Whether or not Cat's aware how the tabloids work is still a mystery to me. However, she is still willing to show up to support him at DWTS - for the opportunity... for the $$$, right?

I was such a hater during the whole Jason and Molly and Melissa fiasco, but they went back to normal life, preserved, did the long distance, for over a year and eventually got married. JP and Ashley left their busy life in NY to settle down and compromise in Princeton - and then got married. For Sean and Cat to be proclaiming their love and their wedding aspirations to the world after a few weeks in the Hollywood spotlight is silly to me.


is he the one making a big deal of this though? i think it may be tptb instead. whenever there has been a guy on the show that was a virgin they announce it from the rooftops. i've seen them do it over and over and over. honestly, i think the guys would probably rather not have it advertised as they get pigeonholed into some goody two shoes role.

albean99 wrote:Obviously everyone has the right to their opinion but think it's sad that gay is being thrown around in relation to Sean being celebate. Haven't we come further in this day & age?

word

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1 - Page 36 Empty Re: The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1

Post by charriotoffire Sat Apr 06, 2013 6:05 pm

cimcoe wrote: :Welcomemembers charriotoffire! Yes you are in the correct thread. yes I have to admit wondering if he is asexual has crossed my mind as well.

Thank you for the welcome sign cimcoe. That is so sweet. Embarressed!

Also, I wondered if they will get married if ABC is not at all involved. If ABC is not involved and they are left to their own devices I don't think a wedding will happen. But since his image is foremost in Sean's mind, he will make sure that there will be a wedding.
charriotoffire
charriotoffire

Posts : 413
Join date : 2013-04-06

Back to top Go down

The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1 - Page 36 Empty Re: The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1

Post by Beeleever Sat Apr 06, 2013 6:13 pm

gabriele wrote:
noobsleuth wrote:IDK ... maybe this all just proves my point that the relationship isn't as healthy as they are making it out to be. I don't think Sean is gay ... but I do think he cares about his image therefore caring about whatever marketable qualities he might have. If the celibate thing sells, then that is what he's going to go with (or at least his agents or telling him to do so). I can't blame him for the man that he is. IMO he wants $$$ (who doesn't) and his celibacy is what's making the headlines. Whether or not Cat's aware how the tabloids work is still a mystery to me. However, she is still willing to show up to support him at DWTS - for the opportunity... for the $$$, right?

I was such a hater during the whole Jason and Molly and Melissa fiasco, but they went back to normal life, preserved, did the long distance, for over a year and eventually got married. JP and Ashley left their busy life in NY to settle down and compromise in Princeton - and then got married. For Sean and Cat to be proclaiming their love and their wedding aspirations to the world after a few weeks in the Hollywood spotlight is silly to me.


is he the one making a big deal of this though? i think it may be tptb instead. whenever there has been a guy on the show that was a virgin they announce it from the rooftops. i've seen them do it over and over and over. honestly, i think the guys would probably rather not have it advertised as they get pigeonholed into some goody two shoes role.

I agree that Sean isn't the one making a big deal out of it, however, I do believe he knew going into the season that TPTB were going to make it his MO. And knowing that, he still agreed to sign on the dotted line...
Beeleever
Beeleever

Female Posts : 3644
Join date : 2011-03-23
Age : 64
Location : Mall of America...Shoppin' till I drop!

Back to top Go down

The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1 - Page 36 Empty Re: The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1

Post by motherof4 Sat Apr 06, 2013 6:25 pm

cimcoe wrote:
motherof4 wrote:
grace8136 wrote:

With Brooke.. he said he should not have let her give herself to him. That to me means they had sex. You don't need to feel guilty over just dating someone for 3 years when you are young. It was more than that IMO.



Was this in an interview? Do you have a link? Would love to read the article.

I've always read that he said he has been celibate since college.


I've read he's been celibate since college too. On the question of Brooke, it was reported in US Weekly that they never had sex, using "a Lowe pal" as a source. So no direct quotes from Sean or Brooke on that one. They do have a quote from his other ex-girlfriend Ryan Ray saying his relationship with her was pure. Here's the page from the US article (the full article is in the archives - [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Great article about his past relationships but highly suspect about the F3 can't wait to pass first base with Sean in the FS, esp not after how we saw all 3 girls react to getting the FS card which was with reservation.

motherof4

Posts : 199
Join date : 2013-03-24

Back to top Go down

The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1 - Page 36 Empty Re: The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1

Post by Guest Sat Apr 06, 2013 6:40 pm

Catherine said how she would expect the FS to be intimate, so she might have been thinking something would happen. It's also odd that in January or Feb. on GMA, when the virgin bachelor cover came out, she said she didn't know anything about that. I guess she was trying to cover for who the winner was, but I found that a little off. Were there any airport sightings of them going to the secret hide-a-way? And why did Shay say he has been back home ever since the bachelor filming ended? I think that was in Jan.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1 - Page 36 Empty Re: The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1

Post by jcrbil Sat Apr 06, 2013 7:15 pm

Actually, in a Seattle (I believe) interview, Catherine was asked about the headline and she said she felt badly for Sean that he was having to deal with that. And it was before the finale, I think.

Sean was often in LA during the airing- publicly.... and then he'd do a little disappearing act over the weekend. Sean's home base until WTA (after which he stayed in LA) was Dallas. I'd call that back home.

jcrbil

Posts : 6081
Join date : 2012-01-02

Back to top Go down

The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1 - Page 36 Empty Re: The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1

Post by Lucas15 Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:00 pm

grace8136 wrote:Catherine said how she would expect the FS to be intimate, so she might have been thinking something would happen.

She actually said to Sean that she was really concerned and had been since the HTD about the FS and that she was "pretty traditional" when it came to "things like that" and that she had thought about it for the last week and it "freaked her out" because she never thought she could do "anything like that" and she wanted to make sure that she was "seen as a lady" and not as "someone like that" but she had come to realize that it had nothing to do with "that" and was just about spending "time with you". Without using the precise words, Catherine made it very clear to Sean that she was not about to go to the FS and have sexual intercourse with him. Sean said that he believed she knew where he was coming from and that he believed it was an opportunity to spend time alone without cameras. This entire dialog happened before Sean gave her the FS card.

She only used the word "intimate" in an ITM that was spliced in and around the actual FS dialog and as we probably know, ITMs are done with a producer asking questions and prompting certain words and phrases to be used to create an impression. My guess is they recorded the ITM after the FS date and prompted Catherine to use the word intimate so they could create the impression that something more happened than really did or that she expected something that she made very clear she wasn't about to do.

It's also odd that in January or Feb. on GMA, when the virgin bachelor cover came out, she said she didn't know anything about that.

I think the "virgin bachelor" and the "born again virgin" phrases were invented by the tabloids because they make a very catchy cover headline designed to get people to read the (underwhelming) story inside. I think what she didn't know anything about was that the tabloids were going to use those phrases.

Lucas15

Male Posts : 2809
Join date : 2011-06-20

Back to top Go down

The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1 - Page 36 Empty Re: The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1

Post by jcrbil Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:32 pm

ITA Lucas15..... and there are many ways to be intimate besides sexual intimacy. Being intimate might mean they could share personal details (more personal than they had already)..... these two are talkers- Sean's love language is word of affirmation- don't know what Catherine would say.

jcrbil

Posts : 6081
Join date : 2012-01-02

Back to top Go down

The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1 - Page 36 Empty Re: The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1

Post by whit90 Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:51 pm

Lucas15 wrote:
grace8136 wrote:Catherine said how she would expect the FS to be intimate, so she might have been thinking something would happen.

She actually said to Sean that she was really concerned and had been since the HTD about the FS and that she was "pretty traditional" when it came to "things like that" and that she had thought about it for the last week and it "freaked her out" because she never thought she could do "anything like that" and she wanted to make sure that she was "seen as a lady" and not as "someone like that" but she had come to realize that it had nothing to do with "that" and was just about spending "time with you". Without using the precise words, Catherine made it very clear to Sean that she was not about to go to the FS and have sexual intercourse with him. Sean said that he believed she knew where he was coming from and that he believed it was an opportunity to spend time alone without cameras. This entire dialog happened before Sean gave her the FS card.

She only used the word "intimate" in an ITM that was spliced in and around the actual FS dialog and as we probably know, ITMs are done with a producer asking questions and prompting certain words and phrases to be used to create an impression. My guess is they recorded the ITM after the FS date and prompted Catherine to use the word intimate so they could create the impression that something more happened than really did or that she expected something that she made very clear she wasn't about to do.

It's also odd that in January or Feb. on GMA, when the virgin bachelor cover came out, she said she didn't know anything about that.

I think the "virgin bachelor" and the "born again virgin" phrases were invented by the tabloids because they make a very catchy cover headline designed to get people to read the (underwhelming) story inside. I think what she didn't know anything about was that the tabloids were going to use those phrases.

Thank You because that is exactly what happpened and also Sean has never said he was a Born Again Virgin he said in a interview with JK he did not know where that even came from and did not know what it meant.
whit90
whit90

Posts : 2790
Join date : 2012-10-20

Back to top Go down

The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1 - Page 36 Empty Re: The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1

Post by Lucas15 Sat Apr 06, 2013 9:04 pm

jcrbil wrote:ITA Lucas15..... and there are many ways to be intimate besides sexual intimacy. Being intimate might mean they could share personal details (more personal than they had already).....

Precisely and that's probably how the producers got Catherine to use the word intimate - conversations can be intimate - snuggling and / or making out can be intimate (and we did see that they did do that in the FS) and by using that word in questions about that type of intimacy they got Catherine to say it and then edited it to make it look like she and Sean were intimate as in sexually intimate.

Lucas15

Male Posts : 2809
Join date : 2011-06-20

Back to top Go down

The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1 - Page 36 Empty Re: The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1

Post by LoveDovez Sat Apr 06, 2013 9:17 pm

whit90 wrote:
Lucas15 wrote:
grace8136 wrote:Catherine said how she would expect the FS to be intimate, so she might have been thinking something would happen.

She actually said to Sean that she was really concerned and had been since the HTD about the FS and that she was "pretty traditional" when it came to "things like that" and that she had thought about it for the last week and it "freaked her out" because she never thought she could do "anything like that" and she wanted to make sure that she was "seen as a lady" and not as "someone like that" but she had come to realize that it had nothing to do with "that" and was just about spending "time with you". Without using the precise words, Catherine made it very clear to Sean that she was not about to go to the FS and have sexual intercourse with him. Sean said that he believed she knew where he was coming from and that he believed it was an opportunity to spend time alone without cameras. This entire dialog happened before Sean gave her the FS card.

She only used the word "intimate" in an ITM that was spliced in and around the actual FS dialog and as we probably know, ITMs are done with a producer asking questions and prompting certain words and phrases to be used to create an impression. My guess is they recorded the ITM after the FS date and prompted Catherine to use the word intimate so they could create the impression that something more happened than really did or that she expected something that she made very clear she wasn't about to do.

It's also odd that in January or Feb. on GMA, when the virgin bachelor cover came out, she said she didn't know anything about that.

I think the "virgin bachelor" and the "born again virgin" phrases were invented by the tabloids because they make a very catchy cover headline designed to get people to read the (underwhelming) story inside. I think what she didn't know anything about was that the tabloids were going to use those phrases.

Thank You because that is exactly what happpened and also Sean has never said he was a Born Again Virgin he said in a interview with JK he did not know where that even came from and did not know what it meant.




Wait...... with ALL due respect to Sean.... they didn't pull this out of their hats or thin air..... Sean HAD to have said this to somebody at one time or another... Maybe he didn't know they would run with it the way they have or maybe he did. That's something NONE of us know, but to say he NEVER said this is a mistake IMHO!!!
LoveDovez
LoveDovez

Female Posts : 4070
Join date : 2012-01-27

Back to top Go down

The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1 - Page 36 Empty Re: The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1

Post by Lucas15 Sat Apr 06, 2013 9:29 pm

whit90 wrote:Thank You because that is exactly what happened and also Sean has never said he was a Born Again Virgin he said in a interview with JK he did not know where that even came from and did not know what it meant.

I read the same interview. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to take the commonly used phrase "born again Christian" and the word "virgin" and come up with "born again virgin" so it's not hard to see where some tabloid writer came up with it and the phrase stuck. And even the use of the worn "virgin" doesn't fit Sean either because he's not a virgin; he has admitted to "being with" 4 women and that means he isn't a virgin and can never be one again. What he is is currently is celibate until marriage and that's not the same thing - but it also isn't catchy enough for the tabloids who are making a much bigger deal out of this than Sean ever has.

Lucas15

Male Posts : 2809
Join date : 2011-06-20

Back to top Go down

The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1 - Page 36 Empty Re: The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 36 of 47 Previous  1 ... 19 ... 35, 36, 37 ... 41 ... 47  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

The Bachelor 17 - General Discussion - Thread #1

+79
renaissance
glazedover
charriotoffire
whit90
Pattycake92
Jaybird
TrustxLove
landrje
Pipsqueek
motherof4
sallyisleta
lori8481
lavenderred
Ally
pcahelen
marriedtoabaritone
alwaystulips
kitcat
california90
Beeleever
jcrbil
ceebeedeedum
julychild
seacat
albean99
chicagoowl
mtnlvr55
noobsleuth
terabithia
pavalygurl
Peppermom
Amberish
ninu
honey1004
Admin
motheroffive
cimcoe
thinlizzy
livlafluv1
Minney
dw_a_mom
RealityEscape
LoveDovez
veg_out
Fruit Loops
Gingsterose
Lucas15
Longhornfan
Catdwoman50
sdmom
mckenna91
Alanna
Kashathediva
Jodi8
Sprite
Cari
ann3
IrishGal
coloured123
iamreal2u
Litta123
ThankMeLater
deeliciouz
HowSoonIsNow
yrkiemommy
MVMom39forever
Pia1
frajosfanofchris
clueless
Fall5021
atem
ImeldaMarcos
NCGalBecca
umngirl
northernviewer
mare2
docnash14
tigertiz
Love_Me
83 posters
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum