Bachelorette Australia - Georgia Love - Season 2 - F1- F6 - Discussion - *Sleuthing - Spoilers*

Lee's dates have also been chilled dates where they canjust be, talk and makeout. No othe people or activities to take away from time spent with each other.
Also didnt Georgia say something about loving a man glasses in an interview she did recently? I will have to find that video

nylonvagabond wrote:IMO Matty's two SDs were tailored to his personality and his experiences from what Georgia has learned about him.

She also seems to have been able to pinpoint parts of Matty like how he likes surprises and how he is a bit of a perfectionist.

I totally agree with this sentiment!

I feel like with Matty there's an interaction between what's been said and the dates. I just saw the notebook date and though she's fulfilling HER own personal gosling fantasies with the objectively the hottest guy IMO.

Arghhhhhhh I'm confused again............ Lord have mercy someone get me off this merry go round. I think I have changed my mind 16 times in 3 minutes.

I agree with the BTS pics, they are very intimate of M&G. Lees ones particularly the 2SD still nothing. I think he is just helping her out of the boat and they seem more separated. Im just not sure what to think of so many more intimate pics of Matty in the promo. Are they giving him to us on a silver platter or are they hiding Lee.

Also damn Matty where are you? someone needs to take a pic with you just to make sure you are alive son. Has his sister posted anything on Insta of him at least? Whats her name by the way anyone

Miyala wrote:OK, after looking at G and Mattys date again I noticed and interesting cut in the interview with Georgina.

She says that "some people believe you have to feel a spark with someone as soon as you lock eyes with them. But the thing with me and Matty is that /CUT/ every time I see him I`m feeling more and more for him" This is clearly cut, you guys have to listen to it. Why would they have changed it??? What did she actually say? Something that would have giving the ending away? What do U think?

They did the same with Nikki last season. Nikki was in the same clothes but her hair was different. I think they just cut it to make what we hear more interesting and not the other way around

So this is a compilation of what Georgia said during Lee's date.

He's given me butterflies since he walked up the red carpet, we have this amazing connection and we are certainly attracted to each other. (makes me thing he gave her butterflies throughout filming and probably still does)
She didnt say I am attracted to him but WE are certainly attracted to each other.

Lee's sense of humour has stood out to me since day one, we've got the same sense of humour.

The nerves that I felt have completely gone, I feel so at ease with him
I feel so happy with him, its an amazing feeling
(touching his hand) honestly since I first met you even when it has been 5 minutes I have just enjoyed your company so much. I feel really comfortable around you very quickly, I feel like I have known you forever,I am very glad you are here, I am really glad you are here.(said to Lee)

He finally kissed me, I have been waiting all day for this moment I thought it wouldn't happen and I am so glad it did. definite fireworks and sparks

I know 100% that this is not where I want to see it end with Lee, I definitely want to get to know him more and have these amazing feelings he is giving me again.

I believe the interviews were done after filming.
Note: bolded are my thoughts

I can totally see it being her and Lee, and they do match each other really well BUT why would she say it was a slow burn??? When did she say this?

Miyala wrote: I can totally see it being her and Lee, and they do match each other really well BUT why would she say it was a slow burn??? When did she say this?

In a lot of her interviews she was asked about first impressions and the first night. She would include that there was a slow burn that she didn't really spark with on the first night that made a big impression on her.

What I find interesting is that she isn't prompted to talk about this slow burn but she usually does (I would use always here but I haven't read every interview). Whether she has stated it was the f1 that is the slow burn, I'm not sure.

lrose wrote:Hmm, but New Idea (the people who released the pictures and the initial article) wrote this:

"Georgia Love was snapped with her final two"



newidea.com.au/article/celebrityroyals/bachelorette-finalists-revealed-georgia-love

If Jake turned out to be in Singapore too, that is going to be confusing

I agree the wording in the online article makes it sound like a done deal for Matty & Lee, BUT, the print version in the mag definitely says "Georgia was spotted on a third date, which suggests there was another suitor in Singapore" and I just can't get that line out of my head!  

This is not something you would randomly throw into an article.  The only explanations I can think of are:

1. It's an outright lie.  No third date and no photos of it.  They wouldn't be the first gossip mag to tell a porky pie, but it's such a weird thing to throw in at the end of the article unless there's some substance to it, or it's intended as a teaser for a future story.

2. The third date happened (and is presumably Jake).  They got photos but are holding them back for now and will print them in a big reveal next week with the headline "Shock third contender for Georgia's heart - The dark horse no-one saw coming!" or similar.  They would know everyone will assume Lee and Matty will make the finals (from the preview and their popularity since the show started), and also that people would assume only 2 would go to Singapore.  Also maybe Ch 10 slipped them a little sweetener to hold the photos back a while.  It's already a bit suss that these ones took to long to come out!

3. The date happened, but they DIDN'T get photos, because the it happened in a secret location/out of view of the pap cameras. This may be Ch 10 wanting to engineer a shock/surprise episode since they too would know Lee & Matty are likely to be favourites, and presumably wouldn't want the ending to be too predictable and boring.  This would explain why "it's almost like [Ch 10] have given up on trying to keep the results a secret" (Quote for New Idea).  Because maybe they haven't given up trying to hide it! Jake may well still be F1, in which case they've actually hidden the result VERY well indeed.

I don't want to rain on the Lee/Matty parade here - I was as excited as anyone this morning when the DM article came out, but again, even in that article they used the phrase "TWO of The Bachelorette finalists were revealed" - with TWO in capitals no less - which only makes me think there are more than two.  

Really hope I am over-analysing here and it is a Matty/Lee finale with no twists, but want to go on record with this as I have a nasty feeling we may be getting fleeced.  Maybe the magician has us so entranced with what he's doing with his right hand, we're missing the fact that he's about to steal our watch with his left...

Well, I'm firmly back on the Lee train! (with Matty Close second! Next years Bach ftw!!). I think the evidence is there and sometimes when it seems to obvious, maybe it just is! Either, can't wait for a feel good love story, like we got with Snez! I'm so excited.

Bobette wrote:

lrose wrote:Hmm, but New Idea (the people who released the pictures and the initial article) wrote this:

"Georgia Love was snapped with her final two"



newidea.com.au/article/celebrityroyals/bachelorette-finalists-revealed-georgia-love

If Jake turned out to be in Singapore too, that is going to be confusing

I agree the wording in the online article makes it sound like a done deal for Matty & Lee, BUT, the print version in the mag definitely says "Georgia was spotted on a third date, which suggests there was another suitor in Singapore" and I just can't get that line out of my head!  

This is not something you would randomly throw into an article.  The only explanations I can think of are:

1. It's an outright lie.  No third date and no photos of it.  They wouldn't be the first gossip mag to tell a porky pie, but it's such a weird thing to throw in at the end of the article unless there's some substance to it, or it's intended as a teaser for a future story.

2. The third date happened (and is presumably Jake).  They got photos but are holding them back for now and will print them in a big reveal next week with the headline "Shock third contender for Georgia's heart - The dark horse no-one saw coming!" or similar.  They would know everyone will assume Lee and Matty will make the finals (from the preview and their popularity since the show started), and also that people would assume only 2 would go to Singapore.  Also maybe Ch 10 slipped them a little sweetener to hold the photos back a while.  It's already a bit suss that these ones took to long to come out!

3. The date happened, but they DIDN'T get photos, because the it happened in a secret location/out of view of the pap cameras. This may be Ch 10 wanting to engineer a shock/surprise episode since they too would know Lee & Matty are likely to be favourites, and presumably wouldn't want the ending to be too predictable and boring.  This would explain why "it's almost like [Ch 10] have given up on trying to keep the results a secret" (Quote for New Idea).  Because maybe they haven't given up trying to hide it! Jake may well still be F1, in which case they've actually hidden the result VERY well indeed.

I don't want to rain on the Lee/Matty parade here - I was as excited as anyone this morning when the DM article came out, but again, even in that article they used the phrase "TWO of The Bachelorette finalists were revealed" - with TWO in capitals no less - which only makes me think there are more than two.  

Really hope I am over-analysing here and it is a Matty/Lee finale with no twists, but want to go on record with this as I have a nasty feeling we may be getting fleeced.  Maybe the magician has us so entranced with what he's doing with his right hand, we're missing the fact that he's about to steal our watch with his left...

I am with you. I am not getting my hopes up - something seems very "fishy" to me.

Miyala wrote: I can totally see it being her and Lee, and they do match each other really well BUT why would she say it was a slow burn??? When did she say this?

She said something like not all the people I had an immediate connection or chemistry with made it as some sparks fizzled out and then some who she didnt have that initial spark with ended up impacting her life.

'Some of the instant connections I did have with people ended there and on the flip side, there were other people who, had I to make my decision on night one, I would never have looked at again.'
'And they ended up being extremely big parts of my life,' she told Switched On.

Extremely big parts doesnt sound like I chose him to me

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I honestly think they say this to make the F2 not feel too bad. Michael had to believe he mattered to Sam F to be taken to F2, same with Lana and probably Matty D. They all say this during filming and int he interview rounds, but a few days after the finale we hear them say something else about knowing their F1s early but having utmost respect for the F2s. MHO