Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
bachandbachettefans.net :: Completed Shows - Archived - Other Locked or Inactive Forums :: Bachelorette USA - Archived :: Bachelorette USA - Archived :: Bachelorette 10 - Andi Dorfman - Archived :: Bachelorette 10 - Andi Dorfman - Contestants - Archived :: Andi Dorfman Bachelorette 10 - Nick Viall
Page 56 of 80 • Share
Page 56 of 80 • 1 ... 29 ... 55, 56, 57 ... 68 ... 80
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
I think he said/she said would be preferable to this. Andi said she's a woman and doesn't need to feel shame over it, so that's a confirmation IMO.
Nick did a great job of articulating why it hurt and led him on. It left me wondering how/why Andi didn't feel she owed him more of an explanation and why she was so cold to him. Why was Andi telling him (LCD) to think about all he "enjoyed." Would she have had sex with him just to guarantee that an F2 stuck around? She also reminded him of all the first he got. It such a disturbing thought to think it was all a step-up, but I can't help but wonder if it was.
For those that think ATFR was calculated on Nick's part, can you also consider that perhaps it was all calculated on Andi's part? Andi and Aaron Murray were following each other during Juan Pabs season. They unfollowed each other right before filming began. Andi and Josh were photographed in Feb at the same club, separate photos but with a mutual friend in both pictures. Chloe had heard that Andi and Josh were set up in a hotel in CA before filming began. Josh wasn't really shown in PIs as worried that he would not be the F1. Next we have TPTB giving Andi and Josh one of the worst send offs ever at ATFR. It just seems like some puzzle pieces are missing this season. If I don't know what was real and what wasn't, I can only imagine how Nick is feeling trying to sort it out.
Nick did a great job of articulating why it hurt and led him on. It left me wondering how/why Andi didn't feel she owed him more of an explanation and why she was so cold to him. Why was Andi telling him (LCD) to think about all he "enjoyed." Would she have had sex with him just to guarantee that an F2 stuck around? She also reminded him of all the first he got. It such a disturbing thought to think it was all a step-up, but I can't help but wonder if it was.
For those that think ATFR was calculated on Nick's part, can you also consider that perhaps it was all calculated on Andi's part? Andi and Aaron Murray were following each other during Juan Pabs season. They unfollowed each other right before filming began. Andi and Josh were photographed in Feb at the same club, separate photos but with a mutual friend in both pictures. Chloe had heard that Andi and Josh were set up in a hotel in CA before filming began. Josh wasn't really shown in PIs as worried that he would not be the F1. Next we have TPTB giving Andi and Josh one of the worst send offs ever at ATFR. It just seems like some puzzle pieces are missing this season. If I don't know what was real and what wasn't, I can only imagine how Nick is feeling trying to sort it out.
Guest- Guest
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
And so this issue finally died a natural death so bring it up again Nick. Whatever
IMO
IMO
livlafluv1- Posts : 714
Join date : 2011-09-25
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
I think it's pretty much a given that they had sex in the FS. What isn't clear is whether Nick flat out told Andi that he didn't want to have sex with her if she wasn't already sure she was in love with him. IMO, he sort of implied that he did in his blog, but that could just be his opinion, ie, he thinks she SHOULD have known. Andi's story might be completely different on that point, but since she's not talking right now, we don't know.
I would agree that if Nick really spelled it out to Andi, ie, "I don't want us to "make love" if you are still not sure you're picking me" and she did anyway, then she was wrong to do so. But I'm not at all convinced that's what happened.
I would agree that if Nick really spelled it out to Andi, ie, "I don't want us to "make love" if you are still not sure you're picking me" and she did anyway, then she was wrong to do so. But I'm not at all convinced that's what happened.
ironcat- Posts : 4953
Join date : 2011-03-23
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
In the Jezebel interview (which she was interviewed for after the MTA and before the ATFR) Andi said that she knew it was Josh after the FS. So, I honestly think that she wasn't sure when she slept with Nick. But, also in that interview she says that she wouldn't be engaged if Josh wasn't there and that although she definitely had an attraction to Nick, that it was really hard because she liked Nick, and that he "definitely was the second person." So, what she says in interviews is confusing and conflicting. It's a combo between her honest feelings, a re-writing of history (not necessarily in a bad way but in a what you have to do now that you are ready to marry someone else kind of way).
Cecilia- Posts : 2283
Join date : 2011-07-16
Location : Chicago
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
I enjoyed reading the blog post. I am glad it can be discussed if that's the way the wind blows.
No good deed goes unpunished.
Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, bye Felicia!
Kashathediva- Moderator
- Posts : 33375
Join date : 2011-03-23
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
ironcat wrote:I think it's pretty much a given that they had sex in the FS. What isn't clear is whether Nick flat out told Andi that he didn't want to have sex with her if she wasn't already sure she was in love with him. IMO, he sort of implied that he did in his blog, but that could just be his opinion, ie, he thinks she SHOULD have known. Andi's story might be completely different on that point, but since she's not talking right now, we don't know.
I would agree that if Nick really spelled it out to Andi, ie, "I don't want us to "make love" if you are still not sure you're picking me" and she did anyway, then she was wrong to do so. But I'm not at all convinced that's what happened.
EXACTLY, that's it for me just like on the video Nick's perception of what was occurring with Andi and with Josh is 180 degree different than what was shown, everyone has a side, her side, his side and then their is the truth somewhere in the middle.....
“Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind.”
― Bernard M. Baruch
luvlady345- Posts : 1822
Join date : 2011-05-25
Location : South Carolina for now!
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
luvlady345 wrote:ironcat wrote:I think it's pretty much a given that they had sex in the FS. What isn't clear is whether Nick flat out told Andi that he didn't want to have sex with her if she wasn't already sure she was in love with him. IMO, he sort of implied that he did in his blog, but that could just be his opinion, ie, he thinks she SHOULD have known. Andi's story might be completely different on that point, but since she's not talking right now, we don't know.
I would agree that if Nick really spelled it out to Andi, ie, "I don't want us to "make love" if you are still not sure you're picking me" and she did anyway, then she was wrong to do so. But I'm not at all convinced that's what happened.
EXACTLY, that's it for me just like on the video Nick's perception of what was occurring with Andi and with Josh is 180 degree different than what was shown, everyone has a side, her side, his side and then their is the truth somewhere in the middle.....
I don't think he is saying that he straight out told her - don't have sex with me if you don't love me. I think he thought it was implied in that he told her how much he loved her, why he loved her, you are it for me, I want to marry you (all of which we heard on the show) and probably said that having sex with her meant a lot to him. He's allowed to feel that having said all of that, if she wasn't sure, she shouldn't have done it. I think that she still wasn't sure at that point bc she wanted to see how Josh would be with her alone. And Nick probably thinks that too and doesn't like that he was plan b. Can't blame him. He's just different bc he doesn't mind talking about it!
Cecilia- Posts : 2283
Join date : 2011-07-16
Location : Chicago
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
I don't have any doubt where Nick's head was at--the blog post said it all.
We will never know where MeandI's head was at, that's ok. We don't have to. All we know is they were not on the same page.
We will never know where MeandI's head was at, that's ok. We don't have to. All we know is they were not on the same page.
No good deed goes unpunished.
Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, bye Felicia!
Kashathediva- Moderator
- Posts : 33375
Join date : 2011-03-23
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
I liked the blog post as well. The point I took from it was being respectful about what sex means to both parties. If it was seen as an affirmation by Nick and not by Andi, that's gonna hurt. I go back to my mantra that it's all about Andi. If she had been the least bit gracious to Nick at the ATFR, I don't think he would have "gone there". He was shell shocked the morning of the FRC when she told him. Once he processed the information he had questions as I would and I think many would. For those who expect him to just get over it, I am reminded that Drew said it took him months to resolve his feelings about Des and she was nothing if not kind to him at his dismissal.
pavalygurl- Posts : 6254
Join date : 2011-05-17
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
Kashathediva wrote:I don't have any doubt where Nick's head was at--the blog post said it all.
We will never know where MeandI's head was at, that's ok. We don't have to. All we know is they were not on the same page.
So true! And she turned off with Nick almost immediately. That would be so hard for me.
Cecilia- Posts : 2283
Join date : 2011-07-16
Location : Chicago
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
In one of the interviews, Andi said ". I think if Josh wasn’t there I would not be engaged right now—I really, truly believe that." (http://modernluxury.com/jezebel/story/making-mrs-murray) So regardless of what happened in the FS, and I have no idea and frankly don't care, she wasn't going to get engaged to Nick.
eliza3- Posts : 802
Join date : 2013-02-07
Location : Seattle
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
Cecilia wrote:In the Jezebel interview (which she was interviewed for after the MTA and before the ATFR) Andi said that she knew it was Josh after the FS. So, I honestly think that she wasn't sure when she slept with Nick. But, also in that interview she says that she wouldn't be engaged if Josh wasn't there and that although she definitely had an attraction to Nick, that it was really hard because she liked Nick, and that he "definitely was the second person." So, what she says in interviews is confusing and conflicting. It's a combo between her honest feelings, a re-writing of history (not necessarily in a bad way but in a what you have to do now that you are ready to marry someone else kind of way).
See for me, I don't think it was too conflicting or confusing. In interviews she also stated from the moment Josh stepped out of the limo, there was something there, but she didn't know with 100% certainty until after the fantasy suite. In one of CH's blogs, he essentially said that production basically told her to try out other relationships and if she ends up with Josh, then that's great, but it would be best to keep herself open. I think that ties in directly with what she said. From the beginning she knew there was something with Josh, but she formed other relationships too. Nick was "definitely the number two person" but she fell in love with Josh.
For her based off what she said, it seems like in the fantasy suite she saw that Josh was the same person on and off camera and that his feelings were genuine so it kind of finally lowered that last wall she had up with him. She stated that she was attracted to Nick and liked him, but she didn't describe anything further than that. As sad as it is, and it might not be the best way to put it, I think Nick was always her "plan B" if it didn't work with Josh. I happen to think that if Josh had his fantasy date first, there would have been a good chance she wouldn't have slept with Nick, especially since she's saying after her fantasy date with Josh she knew it was going to be him.
Ash2214- Posts : 7195
Join date : 2014-04-28
Page 56 of 80 • 1 ... 29 ... 55, 56, 57 ... 68 ... 80
bachandbachettefans.net :: Completed Shows - Archived - Other Locked or Inactive Forums :: Bachelorette USA - Archived :: Bachelorette USA - Archived :: Bachelorette 10 - Andi Dorfman - Archived :: Bachelorette 10 - Andi Dorfman - Contestants - Archived :: Andi Dorfman Bachelorette 10 - Nick Viall
Page 56 of 80
+99
vivi2
StacyNor
Bet2Win
eliza3
philphan
Marybods
Georgia Lindsay
ThankMeLater
beader
Iam4UGA
albean99
Beagle
quietpal
whit90
pavalygurl
alwaystulips
Jolena
Di_ATL
Woodyallen90210
motheroffive
Acrunch
Sable
Cari
sissyintexas
unknown82
jlccaz
Pia1
Luvstruck
emad0722
emeraldluvsbama
George1218
MMA50
lisahelmantoler
richmondrose
aglaea
Amberish
Catdwoman50
2observe
b
rosesrREd
Brill
bleuberry
mercieme
eirekay
Rolly
umngirl
BuckeyeGal06
ironcat
Relalou
BachfanNY
chloep
livlafluv1
gramof6
lavenderred
lovelySC
Admin
FLChica
atem
docnash14
soccermom333
cindebugg
pander3575
Kashathediva
stuckinsc
luvlady345
bilolo
lleyki
Bronwyn
CHO
Luvvy
sdmom
Ash2214
kdubs_ca
Litta123
Tnmomof4
Hotmomma
Alanna
bluwavz
Piper61
MVMom39forever
torybean
DMBFan
Norcalgal
dw_a_mom
SueSt
Cecilia
emusha
sbolduc
MiaHawk
ag54
Lucas15
Mirzam
isittrue
Jeepers
nutty1
Karche
clueless
happygolucky
GuardianAngel
103 posters
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum