The Bachelorette 10 - *Final 1-F2* - Speculation * Sleuthing - Spoilers Thread #2
bachandbachettefans.net :: Completed Shows - Archived - Other Locked or Inactive Forums :: Bachelorette USA - Archived :: Bachelorette USA - Archived :: Bachelorette 10 - Andi Dorfman - Archived :: Bachelorette 10 - Andi Dorfman - Contestants - Archived :: The Bachelorette 10 - *Sleuthing* - Final 1-F2* - Speculation - Archived
Page 67 of 79 • 1 ... 35 ... 66, 67, 68 ... 73 ... 79
Re: The Bachelorette 10 - *Final 1-F2* - Speculation * Sleuthing - Spoilers Thread #2
Al wrote:nd4reality, to respond to your thought about Josh possibly being on BiP and seeing Marcus, I really didn't get that impression from the tweets. Josh tweeted "...we have some catching up to do my friend", which made me think they had not seen each other in a while.
Yes even 2 weeks is still a while right ?
Team #
iPad mini typos . So sorry.
nd4reality- Posts : 13685
Join date : 2011-05-24
Age : 56
Re: The Bachelorette 10 - *Final 1-F2* - Speculation * Sleuthing - Spoilers Thread #2
Maybe the lack of SC is contributing to it, once we get them it'll be funnier.nd4reality wrote:bilolo wrote:So when all this is over and the spoilers become right, what will we take from it spoiler-wise ?
Never stop sleuthing ?
IDK otherwise what would be the point if all we have to do is go by what RS says ?
I myself will be on the non spoiled section in future. For as long as I can hold out. Last season was way more fun figuring out that Clare could not be F1.
bilolo- Posts : 2995
Join date : 2011-06-17
Age : 44
Re: The Bachelorette 10 - *Final 1-F2* - Speculation * Sleuthing - Spoilers Thread #2
Litta123 wrote:rosesrREd wrote:
***snipped***
My Twitter feed is in EST, and the time stamp says 8:24 PM. So, I don't know?
This is my experience with twitter and Iconosquare (a viewing place for instagram) -- all times shown are based on your (the user's/the observer's) settings. For example, I live in the CT zone. My ipad/iphone/computer is set to this. Thus when I look at twitter, all times listed are based on my time zone. I tested it with iconosquare. It works the same way. (See my examples below as I tested both twitter and iconosquare with changing my time settings.)
So what I conclude is that, no matter what, the point of reference should always be the time zone of your settings as to when something is posted. We had an issue with this during RFL. The poster who lived also in CST was seeing a different time than I was. She later realized her settings on twitter were for EST. Anyway, all I can say is that this has been my experience. Is it possible that your settings accidentally changed?
My twitter feed of Andi's pic after I change the time zones.
Instagram on iconsosquare...
So what does this mean? The photos were posted (not necessarily taken) during the time frame above. If Andi was in the midwest, use the CST listed. If Andi was in the east, use the EST as a point of reference. Since the instagram/iconsquare photo chronologically came first, those are the times that should be considered when comparing to the sunset times.
I understand. So, it depends on your time zone. I changed by time zone to Pacific, and the picture showed up at 5:24 PM. Thank you for clearing that up.
rosesrREd- Posts : 1456
Join date : 2012-06-23
Location : Seattle, WA
Re: The Bachelorette 10 - *Final 1-F2* - Speculation * Sleuthing - Spoilers Thread #2
Well whenever I tell someone that we need to catch up, it had been a lot longer than 2 weeks since I last spoke to them. But it's coming from Josh's POV, so we don't know whether 2 weeks is long enough for him to say that or 2 months. Another classic case of we'll see soon enough :Nod:nd4reality wrote:Al wrote:nd4reality, to respond to your thought about Josh possibly being on BiP and seeing Marcus, I really didn't get that impression from the tweets. Josh tweeted "...we have some catching up to do my friend", which made me think they had not seen each other in a while.
Yes even 2 weeks is still a while right ?
Al- Posts : 1069
Join date : 2011-07-09
Re: The Bachelorette 10 - *Final 1-F2* - Speculation * Sleuthing - Spoilers Thread #2
bilolo wrote:Maybe the lack of SC is contributing to it, once we get them it'll be funnier.nd4reality wrote:bilolo wrote:So when all this is over and the spoilers become right, what will we take from it spoiler-wise ?
Never stop sleuthing ?
IDK otherwise what would be the point if all we have to do is go by what RS says ?
I myself will be on the non spoiled section in future. For as long as I can hold out. Last season was way more fun figuring out that Clare could not be F1.
Perhaps. Though I doubt they will give us too much.
They may just give us some fake MTA (of CH mostly) from a previous season and be done with it. Annoying.
As for spoilers, the B'ette season where we got spoilers from almost the second the FRC was done, let me scratching my head in puzzlement because I did not see a connection between the lead and the spoiled f1. Yet f1 he was. That was Jef and Emily. But most of the board saw this marvelous forever connection and basically jumped on the spoiled f1 bandwagon all season long. :giggle:
That should never happen but it does. Similarly for Brad2.0 and Chantal, there were pages after pages of the great connection he had with Chantal again by spoiled f1 bandwagon hoppers. Again we ll know how that turned out.
Sadly many here and on old fort don't want to see both sides of the coin.
So sleuthing is important. And should never stop. RS has not be right all the time.
Team #
iPad mini typos . So sorry.
nd4reality- Posts : 13685
Join date : 2011-05-24
Age : 56
Re: The Bachelorette 10 - *Final 1-F2* - Speculation * Sleuthing - Spoilers Thread #2
I agree with you. Two weeks might seem like a long time for people who see each other or are in contact with each other every day. I don't think that is the case with Josh and Marcus. They may have had limited contact since the last RC that they were together at, and that may have been F4. But like you said, we will know soon.Al wrote:Well whenever I tell someone that we need to catch up, it had been a lot longer than 2 weeks since I last spoke to them. But it's coming from Josh's POV, so we don't know whether 2 weeks is long enough for him to say that or 2 months. Another classic case of we'll see soon enough :Nod:nd4reality wrote:Al wrote:nd4reality, to respond to your thought about Josh possibly being on BiP and seeing Marcus, I really didn't get that impression from the tweets. Josh tweeted "...we have some catching up to do my friend", which made me think they had not seen each other in a while.
Yes even 2 weeks is still a while right ?
Piper61- Posts : 6364
Join date : 2012-06-13
Location : Houston
Re: The Bachelorette 10 - *Final 1-F2* - Speculation * Sleuthing - Spoilers Thread #2
You're right but i think sleuthing means dissecting everything and not dismiss everything though. Or it's not ?nd4reality wrote:bilolo wrote:Maybe the lack of SC is contributing to it, once we get them it'll be funnier.nd4reality wrote:
Never stop sleuthing ?
IDK otherwise what would be the point if all we have to do is go by what RS says ?
I myself will be on the non spoiled section in future. For as long as I can hold out. Last season was way more fun figuring out that Clare could not be F1.
Perhaps. Though I doubt they will give us too much.
They may just give us some fake MTA (of CH mostly) from a previous season and be done with it. Annoying.
As for spoilers, the B'ette season where we got spoilers from almost the second the FRC was done, let me scratching my head in puzzlement because I did not see a connection between the lead and the spoiled f1. Yet f1 he was. That was Jef and Emily. But most of the board saw this marvelous forever connection and basically jumped on the spoiled f1 bandwagon all season long. :giggle:
That should never happen but it does. Similarly for Brad2.0 and Chantal, there were pages after pages of the great connection he had with Chantal again by spoiled f1 bandwagon hoppers. Again we ll know how that turned out.
Sadly many here and on old fort don't want to see both sides of the coin.
So sleuthing is important. And should never stop. RS has not be right all the time.
bilolo- Posts : 2995
Join date : 2011-06-17
Age : 44
Re: The Bachelorette 10 - *Final 1-F2* - Speculation * Sleuthing - Spoilers Thread #2
pander3575- Posts : 1936
Join date : 2011-08-21
Re: The Bachelorette 10 - *Final 1-F2* - Speculation * Sleuthing - Spoilers Thread #2
Yeah i go everywhere here, why limit myself, if i don't like a post , i scroll down .pander3575 wrote:No he hasn't which is why, even though I'm a Josh fan, read almost every single thread and post. I also have to add that the place I love reading the most is the unspoiled thread.
bilolo- Posts : 2995
Join date : 2011-06-17
Age : 44
Re: The Bachelorette 10 - *Final 1-F2* - Speculation * Sleuthing - Spoilers Thread #2
bilolo wrote:You're right but i think sleuthing means dissecting everything and not dismiss everything though. Or it's not ?nd4reality wrote:bilolo wrote:
Maybe the lack of SC is contributing to it, once we get them it'll be funnier.
Perhaps. Though I doubt they will give us too much.
They may just give us some fake MTA (of CH mostly) from a previous season and be done with it. Annoying.
As for spoilers, the B'ette season where we got spoilers from almost the second the FRC was done, let me scratching my head in puzzlement because I did not see a connection between the lead and the spoiled f1. Yet f1 he was. That was Jef and Emily. But most of the board saw this marvelous forever connection and basically jumped on the spoiled f1 bandwagon all season long. :giggle:
That should never happen but it does. Similarly for Brad2.0 and Chantal, there were pages after pages of the great connection he had with Chantal again by spoiled f1 bandwagon hoppers. Again we ll know how that turned out.
Sadly many here and on old fort don't want to see both sides of the coin.
So sleuthing is important. And should never stop. RS has not be right all the time.
For sure. And that is the reason I posted that I think Josh is F1 but but some of the evidence is circumstantial and therefore is still a percent that someone else could be.
Team #
iPad mini typos . So sorry.
nd4reality- Posts : 13685
Join date : 2011-05-24
Age : 56
Re: The Bachelorette 10 - *Final 1-F2* - Speculation * Sleuthing - Spoilers Thread #2
Can I ask...what do you mean by funnier?bilolo wrote:Maybe the lack of SC is contributing to it, once we get them it'll be funnier.nd4reality wrote:bilolo wrote:So when all this is over and the spoilers become right, what will we take from it spoiler-wise ?
Never stop sleuthing ?
IDK otherwise what would be the point if all we have to do is go by what RS says ?
I myself will be on the non spoiled section in future. For as long as I can hold out. Last season was way more fun figuring out that Clare could not be F1.
IMO, they are holding the screencaps for a reason...maybe has something to do Josh not being F1??
Candace: There is nothing better than an Auntie's Love!
Aunties_Love- Posts : 10821
Join date : 2011-10-26
Age : 55
Location : Island Time
Re: The Bachelorette 10 - *Final 1-F2* - Speculation * Sleuthing - Spoilers Thread #2
oliviafish- Posts : 3
Join date : 2013-06-22
Page 67 of 79 • 1 ... 35 ... 66, 67, 68 ... 73 ... 79
bachandbachettefans.net :: Completed Shows - Archived - Other Locked or Inactive Forums :: Bachelorette USA - Archived :: Bachelorette USA - Archived :: Bachelorette 10 - Andi Dorfman - Archived :: Bachelorette 10 - Andi Dorfman - Contestants - Archived :: The Bachelorette 10 - *Sleuthing* - Final 1-F2* - Speculation - Archived