Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - General Discussion - *Sleuthing Spoilers* - #2

A1day1 wrote:Rachel has a past too, no big deal IMO. But we don't need to bring down this woman's look to validate Rachel. JMO

bleuberry wrote:Aw let's not put her looks down to build up Rach. I love Petal too but that just feels icky.

Thank you two so much!! I feel so uncomfortable reading not so complimentary comments on her. She didn't sign up for this show. She didn't get any interviews for attention. She probably is unaware of people talking about her behind her, so can we leave her, actually, all the exes out (unless they decide to go public then that's different, imo.)?

@sdmom Thanks!

@sdmom I agree.

GuardianAngel wrote:Maybe this is his signature smooth move?

I am thinking so

AllAboutLove wrote:

GuardianAngel wrote:Maybe this is his signature smooth move?

I am thinking so

It would certainly sweep me off my feet.

Maybe she's his agent and not an ex?

@sdmom Is that not the weight lose and Days of our lives girl???

I am hoping it's an ex or someone he was romantically interested. Because if not then I find it really strange move on his part and essentially meaningless if he is like that with a woman he was not even romantically interested in

@reason don't know since I don't watch soap opera.

I believe that's a different Alison Sweeney. She spells her name with 1 L as opposed to 2 like the woman in the titanic photo.

Whether she's an ex or a friend is meaningless to me personally because the move with Rachel, in front of 10 other dudes she's also dating, is clearly projecting his intentions loud and clear imo. Whatever he has with Alli in that scenario doesn't compare to the same move in this context with Rach imo.

What's funny is Peter is so non problematic (IMO) that a titanic pose on a boat has me engrossed. I really hope this is as 'bad' as it gets .