Re: Ben Higgins - Lauren Bushnell - Bachelor 20 - Discussion - #5

by Lennoxcolinrolland Wed Feb 01, 2017 5:43 pm

The girl can't win, that's true. That's why there's no point in arguing about it (because opinions just can't and won't be swayed sometimes.) IMO. Interesting discussion is what keeps the world spinnin round IMO.

by BlackHalo Wed Feb 01, 2017 5:43 pm

hae1001 wrote:Im so confused. Yesterday Lauren was ridiculed for not wearing a cheap replacement ring while she was on vacation. Today, now that we have a close up of the ring she was wearing, the cheap replacement is not good enough? How dare Lauren go to Mexico with just her sister and not bring her 100k diamond ring with her, especially when there is tumoil brewing between Mexico and the US. The girl just can win IMO.

She ain't Lauren B if she isn't being criticized for something.

by Lennoxcolinrolland Wed Feb 01, 2017 5:46 pm

Yesterday, even with the weird stuff going on, I was still convinced they would work it out and get married. Now today, with that US article (and its usual importance in this franchise), I'm confused and not so sure. What's the truth?! laugh out loud

by hae1001 Wed Feb 01, 2017 5:49 pm

@Lennoxcolinrolland us weekly also reported that Caila quinn was the bachelorette according to "their sources" which they posted after RS reported so. That was obviously wrong. They quite often piggy back off of his site. Even RS called them out on twitter after they posted the article. This is a very common occurrence, judging by the many accusations RS has made

by Guest Wed Feb 01, 2017 5:50 pm

@Lennoxcolinrolland haha US weekly is not the best source. reality Steve said they always steal posts that Info from his site/posts and add on that they have sources.. look at his twitter page today following his B+L post (which he said he couldn't confirm whether it was true or not but he hasn't heard anything) and shortly after his post US weekly publishes and puts they have sources.

Unless ET posts (Lauren Zima in particular as she is the one that has a personal relationship with them) or people then I don't trust it.

by umngirl Wed Feb 01, 2017 5:51 pm

Lauren wearing a B ring would mean more if that wasn't the first letter of her last name. Just sayin...

JMOAA

by Guest Wed Feb 01, 2017 5:56 pm

@clobrown yes, that was exactly my thoughts . RS have always accused US weekly for stealing information from him and them to post that article soon after RS posted in his blog was very funny . I just couldn't stop laughing .

by Lennoxcolinrolland Wed Feb 01, 2017 5:57 pm

hae1001 wrote:@Lennoxcolinrolland us weekly also reported that Caila quinn was the bachelorette according to "their sources" which they posted after RS reported so. That was obviously wrong. They quite often piggy back off of his site. Even RS called them out on twitter after they posted the article. This is a very common occurrence, judging by the many accusations RS has made

That goes in line with what has been out there though. Caila was the contender for ETTE, until they dropped the ball on her.

And RS thinks everyone steals info from him, that's just what he does IMO.

by Cocoasneeze Wed Feb 01, 2017 5:57 pm

Seabear wrote:I don't think Ben and Lauren are officially over yet....BUT....IMO Ben's lack of support and commitment to Lauren over the duration of their relationship is most likely a death knell. IMO it was painfully obvious how broken they are watching them on the when is the wedding interview...at the Nick premier event. I have a hard time believing that the pain inflicted on Lauren is something she can overcome....or something she should have to compromise on. I believe they are trying to make it work but some things are hard hurtles to overcome. Luckily for Lauren she has lots of strong devoted women friends and an amazing family to support her.
JMO

I think she's taking her own step back. Ben took his, a few times, and IMO it's been hard for her to handle. IMO it's good, that she seems in high spirits with her sister, after spending time with her friends.

by Lennoxcolinrolland Wed Feb 01, 2017 6:00 pm

This article had a direct quote though. Not just "RS based info." Someone had to be the source IMO!

by Guest Wed Feb 01, 2017 6:03 pm

When they mention source, they always direct quote . Who knows who the source is . But for me, to post only after RS has posted. And to find a source so fast who will comment on it within few minutes seems fishy .IMO

by hae1001 Wed Feb 01, 2017 6:06 pm

A source doesnt have to be a real person. By saying according to sources, a source said, rumors swirling, etc they can put anything they want in the article and it doesnt come back on them. They cant be sued for defamation or slander. This is provable fact.

by Sponsored content