Juan Pablo Galavis - Nikki Ferrell - Bachelor 18 - Discussion

albean99 wrote:

BohemianNika wrote:I'm afraid this might be OT, but here goes:

Sl** = a promiscuous woman; especially :  prostitute

English is not my first language and I wanted to make sure I have the exact meaning. How in the world does posting of somewhat revealing pictures equals to acting like a sl**? It must be a cultural thing, because in my country, it doesn't.

She attacked him on SM, which was stupid of her, and I strongly disagree with people who do this. He attacked back, which might have been understandable, had he used another word. But sl**? JPG himself admitted he watched some of Jenna's older videos. Hey, no shame in that. I personally think people are free to watch whatever they want as long as nobody was forced to make said video or harmed. But you don't get to call someone sl**, when you are a porn consumer! That is hypocrisy at it's best. All JMO.

I don't hate JPG. And I believe he isn't a terrible person. But sometimes he says really stupid things.

I don't think he had to call her anything but there are definitely less offensive comments he could have made. I don't agree with what she posted either but he's the one who has a public image. You'd think he'd have learned after the gay comments he made.

whit90 wrote:

umngirl wrote:

whit90 wrote:

I do not agree that Juan should of posted what he did but there is quite a difference in what the other woman posted on her IG than what Nikki has posted. I have yet to see any pics. of Nikki in the nude on her IG. It still does not make it right what he said but you can not compare Nikki's pics. to the other woman's pics. IMO

The woman never exposes her lady bits or her tatas fully. Those parts are always covered or the angle conceals them. Same with Nikki's photos. I fail to see the difference other than this woman has more pictures.

I do not see why Nikki has anything to do with this in the first place. I will disagree with you again that the other woman is showing a lot more than Nikki ever has.

Posters calling him a azzhole , douchebag, etc.., to me that is just as bad as calling some woman a s*** that you really do not know.  Any name calling in my opinion is just wrong when you personally do not know the person. IMO

I know we will just have to agree to disagree ........    

umngirl wrote:Considering Nikki has posed in photoshoots where is is barely clothed/has items distinctly covering certain areas, I wonder if JuanPa would call her a sl** too.

chinita wrote:

umngirl wrote:Considering Nikki has posed in photoshoots where is is barely clothed/has items distinctly covering certain areas, I wonder if JuanPa would call her a sl** too.

That's for her modeling job.  That's different.

umngirl wrote:

whit90 wrote:

umngirl wrote:

The woman never exposes her lady bits or her tatas fully. Those parts are always covered or the angle conceals them. Same with Nikki's photos. I fail to see the difference other than this woman has more pictures.

I do not see why Nikki has anything to do with this in the first place. I will disagree with you again that the other woman is showing a lot more than Nikki ever has.

Posters calling him a azzhole , douchebag, etc.., to me that is just as bad as calling some woman a s*** that you really do not know.  Any name calling in my opinion is just wrong when you personally do not know the person. IMO

I know we will just have to agree to disagree ........    

I brought Nikki's photos up as a point of comparison because some were saying the woman was acting sl**ty by posting those photos so she basically shouldn't be surprised to be called a sl**. I wanted to point out that if JuanPa called her that, he very well could have called Nikki that since she too has posed for photos like that.

He isn't the first person from this franchise to be called names. He could have chosen a different response. He didn't. I think it makes him look like an a$$hole.

But you're right, we'll just have to agree to disagree.

vivi2 wrote:
Hey guys,  maybe it's just the language barrier or the culture????

whit90 wrote:

umngirl wrote:

whit90 wrote:

I do not see why Nikki has anything to do with this in the first place. I will disagree with you again that the other woman is showing a lot more than Nikki ever has.

Posters calling him a azzhole , douchebag, etc.., to me that is just as bad as calling some woman a s*** that you really do not know.  Any name calling in my opinion is just wrong when you personally do not know the person. IMO

I know we will just have to agree to disagree ........    

I brought Nikki's photos up as a point of comparison because some were saying the woman was acting sl**ty by posting those photos so she basically shouldn't be surprised to be called a sl**. I wanted to point out that if JuanPa called her that, he very well

could have called Nikki that since she too has posed for photos like that.

He isn't the first person from this franchise to be called names. He could have chosen a different response. He didn't. I think it makes him look like an a$$hole.

But you're right, we'll just have to agree to disagree.

Nikki had nothing to do with what Juan and this woman posted to each other. I do not understand why she is even being compared to this woman. I have said that I do not agree with what either one of them posted.

whit90 wrote:

albean99 wrote:

BohemianNika wrote:I'm afraid this might be OT, but here goes:


English is not my first language and I wanted to make sure I have the exact meaning. How in the world does posting of somewhat revealing pictures equals to acting like a sl**? It must be a cultural thing, because in my country, it doesn't.

She attacked him on SM, which was stupid of her, and I strongly disagree with people who do this. He attacked back, which might have been understandable, had he used another word. But sl**? JPG himself admitted he watched some of Jenna's older videos. Hey, no shame in that. I personally think people are free to watch whatever they want as long as nobody was forced to make said video or harmed. But you don't get to call someone sl**, when you are a porn consumer! That is hypocrisy at it's best. All JMO.

I don't hate JPG. And I believe he isn't a terrible person. But sometimes he says really stupid things.

I don't think he had to call her anything but there are definitely less offensive comments he could have made. I don't agree with what she posted either but he's the one who has a public image. You'd think he'd have learned after the gay comments he made.

So now he is a porn consumer because he has watched Jenna ?? How many man and woman know who Jenna is? Let's say millions I even knew who she was and I am sure my husband has seen her before but that does not make either one of us porn consumers.  

whit90 wrote:

albean99 wrote:

BohemianNika wrote:I'm afraid this might be OT, but here goes:


English is not my first language and I wanted to make sure I have the exact meaning. How in the world does posting of somewhat revealing pictures equals to acting like a sl**? It must be a cultural thing, because in my country, it doesn't.

She attacked him on SM, which was stupid of her, and I strongly disagree with people who do this. He attacked back, which might have been understandable, had he used another word. But sl**? JPG himself admitted he watched some of Jenna's older videos. Hey, no shame in that. I personally think people are free to watch whatever they want as long as nobody was forced to make said video or harmed. But you don't get to call someone sl**, when you are a porn consumer! That is hypocrisy at it's best. All JMO.

I don't hate JPG. And I believe he isn't a terrible person. But sometimes he says really stupid things.

I don't think he had to call her anything but there are definitely less offensive comments he could have made. I don't agree with what she posted either but he's the one who has a public image. You'd think he'd have learned after the gay comments he made.

So now he is a porn consumer because he has watched Jenna ?? How many man and woman know who Jenna is? Let's say millions I even knew who she was and I am sure my husband has seen her before but that does not make either one of us porn consumers.  

albean99 wrote:

BohemianNika wrote:I'm afraid this might be OT, but here goes:

Sl** = a promiscuous woman; especially :  prostitute

English is not my first language and I wanted to make sure I have the exact meaning. How in the world does posting of somewhat revealing pictures equals to acting like a sl**? It must be a cultural thing, because in my country, it doesn't.

She attacked him on SM, which was stupid of her, and I strongly disagree with people who do this. He attacked back, which might have been understandable, had he used another word. But sl**? JPG himself admitted he watched some of Jenna's older videos. Hey, no shame in that. I personally think people are free to watch whatever they want as long as nobody was forced to make said video or harmed. But you don't get to call someone sl**, when you are a porn consumer! That is hypocrisy at it's best. All JMO.

I don't hate JPG. And I believe he isn't a terrible person. But sometimes he says really stupid things.

I don't think he had to call her anything but there are definitely less offensive comments he could have made. I don't agree with what she posted either but he's the one who has a public image. You'd think he'd have learned after the gay comments he made.

Amberish wrote:

whit90 wrote:

albean99 wrote:


I don't think he had to call her anything but there are definitely less offensive comments he could have made. I don't agree with what she posted either but he's the one who has a public image. You'd think he'd have learned after the gay comments he made.

So now he is a porn consumer because he has watched Jenna ?? How many man and woman know who Jenna is? Let's say millions I even knew who she was and I am sure my husband has seen her before but that does not make either one of us porn consumers.  

Juan Pablo said he has watched Jenna's videos when he commented that Jenna use to have big breasts, thus our adorable Juan Pablo is a porn customer --- yes, he watches porn. It's that simple.

I soon expect the response to be, "oh, it doesn't matter ... men watch porn." Any takers?