Re: *No Spoilers* The Bachelor 18 Screencap discussions- thread #3

[richmondrose]

This is the order of sequence going by the number on the thumbnail:




[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]



This is  the order of sequence  using  the time stamp:


[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Shouldn't they match?

[Mirzam]

The sequence makes perfect sense with the time stamps. As Hotmomma suggests, the non sequential numbers could be from different cameras.

[Jeepers]

And historically .. From objective analysis of the SCs .. Meaning that the analyzer has no voiced preference .. The SCs have always told the story

[richmondrose]

The sequence makes perfect sense with the time stamps. As Hotmomma suggests, the non sequential numbers could be from different cameras.

It still doesn't make sense to me. The first order I posted is the same order as the ones released by medianet .... the thumbprint numbers.
I can't see the photographer loading the first 4 of Clare from one camera and then switching to the second 3 of Nikki using the second camera and then going back and to load the last two of Clare from the first camera. Why go back and forth between cameras ? I don't care who he picks, but logically speaking, it just doesn't make sense to me.

[Mirzam]

Well, all we can do at this point is wait for it all to unfold on Monday night. But I don't see a big mystery here. What seems logical to me is one camera for Clare's photos, and another camera for Nikki's as shown by the time stamps. Two cameras, even two photographers?

[albean99]

It says it's the same photographer, Mirzam.  

I experimented with one of my photos. I could save a copy and give it a different name or number but the time stamp remained the same. It's possible the photographer edited the photos and saved them under a different number so he wouldn't get rid of the first one. I often save the original and edit a copy.

[Mirzam]

It says it's the same photographer, Mirzam.  

I experimented with one of my photos. I could save a copy and give it a different name or number but the time stamp remained the same. It's possible the photographer edited the photos and saved them under a different number so he wouldn't get rid of the first one. I often save the original and edit a copy.

That makes sense. I just don't see some massive conspiracy to fool sleuthers here. I doubt the media care about time stamps. There is nothing in the actual photos that gives anything away.

[4health]

I posted this a upthread and thought I would repeat it:  
[/quote]

Her rejection wasn't an hour Jeepers…..she arrived walking on beach at 10:40:11 then CH saying good luck was 10:50:37
10 minutes to walk from beach to walking alone to FRC spot.   So say she is at the FRC 5 minutes later, making it 10:55 (guess)
then she is back to the beach at 11:24:48 which includes the 10 minute walk from FRC to the beach.  She was with JP (guess) from
10:55 to around 11:10 or 11:15….so their good bye etc. was no longer then 15 to 20 minutes including walking time that we don't know
about.  So it wasn't any window time to chat or say "it's okay" "I respect you" or for Clare to give him a riot act.  [/quote]

The so called rejection time frame is only 15 to 20 minutes …. so with that in mind the SC of Clare walking with CH she really doesn't look all broken up or a mess.  Also, if I remember we had Brad 2.0 preview with images of Emily & Chantel (Chantel the spoiled F1) in a preview which was highly debated on time of day and who arrived first, before we got the timestamps SC.  Then a poster very quietly posted the Emily was F1 and then the SC with the timestamps came out and confirmed the post the F1 was truly Emily.   The I remember Jason's season we sleuthed the dress out, the preview showed the bottom half of the girls arriving (Molly's bottom was determined the PD "purple dress") and then the timestamp SC came out and the timestamp confirmed that is was Melissa F1.    We haven't had a FRC preview not showing the girls walking to the FRC that I remember…..but for me timestamp says a lot.  

I will say that the last SC of Clare and Chris is telling me few things:
#1 - Clare isn't crying or a mess - her facial expression is interesting
#2 - Clare being escorted by CH after rejection (yeah she needs to be escorted because of the terrain) don't buy it)
#3 - Clare and CH picture why release it…they have NEVER released a rejection photo, I think they did this time because it is with CH and trying to fool us …..and if that is the case then there is a reason they want to fool us and someone took the time to do it……JMO

Was anyone here when the flowers change on the FRC shot….I do………of course tptb do know that there are people out here like all of us. Do they care no, but since there is a spoiler that likes to make some noise they are well aware of everything and try their hardest to not let him be right.

[Mirzam]

I will say that the last SC of Clare and Chris is telling me few things:
#1 - Clare isn't crying or a mess - her facial expression is interesting
#2 - Clare being escorted by CH after rejection (yeah she needs to be escorted because of the terrain) don't buy it)
#3 - Clare and CH picture why release it…they have NEVER released a rejection photo, I think they did this time because it is with CH and trying to fool us …..and if that is the case then there is a reason they want to fool us and someone took the time to do it……JMO

Wanting to fool us sleuthers? I doubt the staffers uploading photos at abcmedia.net spare much thought for us. As albean said, the only fooling (if you can call it that) going on is in the previews, that are designed for maximum drama, and to mislead.

Monday can't come soon enough and we can move on.   

[iamreal2u]

I think the numbering may be based on arrival(2 series) and departure(3 series) so that they may be located easily. It could be as simple as that.

[4health]

I will say that the last SC of Clare and Chris is telling me few things:
#1 - Clare isn't crying or a mess - her facial expression is interesting
#2 - Clare being escorted by CH after rejection (yeah she needs to be escorted because of the terrain) don't buy it)
#3 - Clare and CH picture why release it…they have NEVER released a rejection photo, I think they did this time because it is with CH and trying to fool us …..and if that is the case then there is a reason they want to fool us and someone took the time to do it……JMO

Wanting to fool us sleuthers? I doubt the staffers uploading photos at abcmedia.net spare much thought for us. As albean said, the only fooling (if you can call it that) going on is in the previews, that are designed for maximum drama, and to mislead.

Monday can't come soon enough and we can move on.   

That is what I said…they don't care about us……but I do believe they care about RS. Not really care but would like him to go away. So another thought is if it is just someone's job to grab a few photos to put out to the media why not put out a few of each lady. Where is Nikki's photo closeup with CH saying whatever like "good luck" etc. Why is there more photos of Clare then Nikki's why not an equal number. They were told which pictures and when they wanted them out…..so I ask WHY?

[4health]

I think the numbering may be based on arrival(2 series) and departure(3 series) so that they may be located easily.  It could be as simple as that.

If that is the case I ask why would they put out a rejection photo? they never have before…..maybe in season past we got a SC from a preview of the rejection and didn't know out, we had to sleuth it out. Why put a rejection photo out before the episode or as you put it "departure" photo?

[Sponsored content]