Re: Episode 10 (Finale Part 1) - 7/29 - Bachelorette 9 - Thread #1

by albean99 Mon Jul 29, 2013 8:17 am

Judiful wrote:I live in the Seattle / Tacoma area... There's a couple Spanish influenced stucco houses not far from me... My great aunt had one many years ago located not far from Sea/Tac airport...!!

I don't think anyone's saying it can't be in Seattle but it's not as likely especially with the pool. I think it looks like a safe house pic but no idea if it really is. Most of the recent f1s have given a photo hint so you just never know.

If the ATFR is live then it's not for secrecy. I'm not sure why the blogger couldn't go though. I can see them going for insiders and actors like they've done before but what are they afraid of getting out? It usually does anyway. question

by northernviewer Mon Jul 29, 2013 8:36 am

albean99 wrote:
Judiful wrote:I live in the Seattle / Tacoma area... There's a couple Spanish influenced stucco houses not far from me... My great aunt had one many years ago located not far from Sea/Tac airport...!!

I don't think anyone's saying it can't be in Seattle but it's not as likely especially with the pool. I think it looks like a safe house pic but no idea if it really is. Most of the recent f1s have given a photo hint so you just never know.

If the ATFR is live then it's not for secrecy. I'm not sure why the blogger couldn't go though. I can see them going for insiders and actors like they've done before but what are they afraid of getting out? It usually does anyway.

How do you reason on the bolded? If it wasn't live, done a few days before, leaks would get out regardless of who's in the audience, invited guests or the general public. It might not be the only reason it's live, but I think logically it is a contributing factor.

by nutty1 Mon Jul 29, 2013 8:54 am

I think she meant the rumored closed set was not for secrecy, if the ATFR was live.

by albean99 Mon Jul 29, 2013 9:12 am

nutty1 wrote:I think she meant the rumored closed set was not for secrecy, if the ATFR was live.

Thanks, Nutty. Yes that's what I meant.

by northernviewer Mon Jul 29, 2013 10:38 am

albean99 wrote:
nutty1 wrote:I think she meant the rumored closed set was not for secrecy, if the ATFR was live.

Thanks, Nutty. Yes that's what I meant.

sorry, now I get what you were trying to say.

by HowSoonIsNow Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:54 pm

What additional benefit does a "closed set" have over simply being live?

Once you have an audience of any sort, they can text or tweet the happenings on the live set as they go on. Unless they confiscated all cell phones, cameras, tablets, etc But they don't need to be a "closed set" to do that.

The only benefit of a closed set, it would seem to me, would be either no audience or a cast of hired actors as the audience. But someone said that Millsy is tweeting out invites, so it's obviously not just hired actors.

I don't get it.

by HowSoonIsNow Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:57 pm

What additional benefit does a "closed set" have over simply being live?

Once you have an audience of any sort, they can text or tweet the happenings on the live set as they go on. Unless they confiscated all cell phones, cameras, tablets, etc But they don't need to be a "closed set" to do that.

The only benefit of a closed set, it would seem to me, would be either no audience or a cast of hired actors as the audience. But someone said that Millsy is tweeting out invites, so it's obviously not just hired actors.

What am I not getting here?

by northernviewer Mon Jul 29, 2013 1:11 pm

maybe because it's not a huge audience, and all the crew and contestants knew a lot of people that wanted in on it??? have no clue, but if it's by invite only, they might be able to get them to react however they want them to? seems to be a lot of bloggers going, so maybe they want lots of publicity to come from whatever is going to happen?

I really have no clue what I'm talking about to tell you the truth lol

by BarbB222 Mon Jul 29, 2013 1:19 pm

Maybe with the size of Brooks' family and alumni, seats are limited.

by iamreal2u Mon Jul 29, 2013 1:22 pm

BarbB222 wrote:Maybe with the size of Brooks' family and alumni, seats are limited.

Or a large number of Brooks family there will give it away.

To add: Since it is live, if every sweep of the audience you see Brooks family, well still not sure how you can hide that.

by nutty1 Mon Jul 29, 2013 1:29 pm

Maybe they just didn't want that lady there! giggling

by Guest Mon Jul 29, 2013 1:30 pm

I keeping reading over and over here that she picks Brooks despite the guy can't make up his mind. I really don't like any of the three. She picks Brooks after he rejects her because she "loves" him? Good luck with that! If it is carefree she wants like Sean boy did she miscalculate. How des a woman fall head over heels for a practical joker who is a bit immature to a serious guy who has to rely on his family for so much direction? Saying I love you is not a family event and if you are that age looking for family approval the odds might be good she picks him but the goods are very odd. What was the boy thinking when he signed up for this? With Chris saying he is not leaving home and Brooks saying he is not on the same page and needs time and it appears he still does that leaves Drew.seems like a decent kid but not marriage material. I think casting could have found better guys. They sure dropped like flies. Love does not conquer all and I feel very bad for Des.

by Sponsored content