Peter Kraus - Bachelorette 13 - **Sleuthing Spoilers** - #4

Dookam23 wrote:@Tiggerlgh 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cv7DK7l9OOM

Thanks! I agree no choppiness while she was giving the rose. There was some vo from the interview but not the rose part.



All imo

@gramercypark10 yea idk what it is but something to me seemed off or it could be me just overanyalzing

@sosleepy You live in Madison!?

Is it bad that my first thought was can sosleepy sign up for his bootcamp just to sleuth a little for us? JK!! of course.

Lawkid wrote:@gramercypark10 yea idk what it is but something to me seemed off or it could be me just overanyalzing

If you listen to it with headphones you can hear the cut imo. I think she elaborated and they cut it. I think Adam asked her what she was looking for and she said something about energy you can't describe. There was also this interview from Mila and Ashton's date that she says about the butterflies. I don't know if this date was shot before or after the 1 on1.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UiWEQXJZ8zo

Dookam23 wrote:@GuardianAngel I'm watching that 1 on 1 date clip rn and ***IMO*** I don't feel like it was just added onto it. It just seems to go with the flow unlike that one time  where Peter had asked Rachel, "Is this an ex" .. ***IMO*** I think that was spliced and not this 1 on 1 date

Sorry, I'm not sure what you're referring to?

stuckinsc wrote:@sosleepy You got me to go look at Peter's IG and from January 28th he had the LAX sign with this "peterkrauswi Missed this place way more than I realized. #LA #homeawayfromhome #wellshit"

I take this to indicative that Peter would be open to going back to California.  There was discussion today of conversation about Palm Springs, CA. JMO.

That would make sense that he was still missing California in January as to why he would ask Rachel if she could see herself living in California as per discussion in another thread. Although he left California as per his SM, health issues, etc he was still missing it. To ask Rachel that question on the first 1:1, IMO seems a little to Me'ish? You're suppose to be there to find love, not if the lead is willing to move to California, a city where there's no connection for her, only you. What if she said she would never move to California. All MO's.

I found it odd.

@stuckinsc I agree with this. He's not really an expressive person but i think he was just nervous!    On sm he seems comfortable and outgoing, I just hope he gets used to Rachel and is comfortable around her. IMO he seemed okay when they were hugging last episode  

Kashathediva wrote:I found it odd.

I didnt

@Dookam23 It could be, or he may never grow into it. I don't know, but I tend to be very expressive and people who don't give a lot of body language back to me can make me very uncomfortable. Perhaps for Rachel overtime, she realized she wanted someone she just felt more secure in the way they communicated with her. I don't know it is all supposition. She obviously is very attracted to Peter, but so far she is definitely leading Peter, it might get tiring for her. Who knows and all of this is JMO.

@GuardianAngel in this clip when Rachel asked Peter if she can bring someone (copper) with them to this date he says absolutely yes and asks if this is an ex boyfriend. It seemed like it was spliced.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBAytqkGr8g

@stuckinsc If the pics we've seen from their HTD he was all touchy touchy and leaning against her etc.., I just hope he showed Rachel what she wants to see!

@Dookam23 thanks but I'm not sure why you're telling me that. I didn't ask.