SELECT CONTENT

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7

Page 33 of 79 Previous  1 ... 18 ... 32, 33, 34 ... 56 ... 79  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 Empty Re: Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7

Post by bluejay25 Mon Jun 05, 2017 4:10 pm

@pvpr I agree we are already being or are about to be trolled by all of them - Rachel, Peter, Bryan, ABC, etc. It's hilarious, I love it! There was clearly thought put into this - one way or another - so well done!


bluejay25

Posts : 197
Join date : 2017-05-16

Back to top Go down

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 Empty Re: Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7

Post by Guest Mon Jun 05, 2017 4:11 pm

Alanna wrote:@pvpr great post except I disagree about the last part: imo it's hilarious watching a 32 yo old extremely well educated woman make a ridiculous choice. IMO of course. I'll fan for them for as long as it lasts if this latest spoiler is right though, I totally get the appeal!
Idk. I think it's a bit too early to call it a ridiculous choice or say they only have a physical connection or whatever because he hasn't even been on a date yet. They've spent like 30 minutes together, max. Now, if we get to the finale and they still are only having surface-level conversations and just sucking each other's faces at every possible opportunity I'll totally agree with you and just enjoy it while it lasts  Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 3806527698

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 Empty Re: Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7

Post by bleuberry Mon Jun 05, 2017 4:12 pm

Des's finale was such a shocker that I'm bummed RS 'fixed' the error, if the was an error to be fixed. Honestly he doesn't sound convincing but if he's right Bryan's edit had better be decent because it's gonna be hard to root for that couple for me laugh out loud. JMO.


Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 6rj59l

In a little glass church built from the inspiration of dreams,  their vows danced through the air 
like smoke from a vigil candle, consummating a love now deeply matured. -Zak Waddell
bleuberry
bleuberry

Posts : 8694
Join date : 2013-07-01

Back to top Go down

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 Empty Re: Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7

Post by Duke702 Mon Jun 05, 2017 4:14 pm

IDK I think Bryan having a not so great edit could be what producers want, if Rachel ends up picking him. They typically want fans to think she won't pick who she does. They tried to sway fans by editing Jordan not as great last year.

Duke702

Posts : 2087
Join date : 2016-01-10

Back to top Go down

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 Empty Re: Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7

Post by Guest Mon Jun 05, 2017 4:14 pm

I don't think it's ridiculous. She can't force herself to fall for Peter just because he seems like the "right choice". I prefer Peter over Bryan, but she knows those men better than me. I remember thinking Luke was perfect last year, and then all these stories came out revealing his true colors. I'm gonna try my best to refrain from judging Bryan...for now laugh out loud laugh out loud

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 Empty Re: Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7

Post by Guest Mon Jun 05, 2017 4:16 pm

pvpr wrote:I am LIVING for this messiness Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 3806527698 IMO either the initial 'Peter is F1' info was a foiler but RS managed to get the correct info, or this new 'Bryan is F1' info is the foiler because they finally have a season where the lead was torn between two people and they want to play it up as much as possible, since Kaitlyn ruined their last chance at a legit foiler (no way anyone would've bought that JoJo or Nick picked Robby and Raven IMO). 

Right now I'm leaning towards the Bryan info being the foiler because they had to have known the sheer circus it would create - this is how I'm picturing Mike Fleiss as he watches Twitter devolve into madness laugh out loud 

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 N2bttpx4f1ky
Source

Either way, I think we'll be getting a lot of conflicting clues/info over the next two months and the finale will actually have some suspense for once laugh out loud We're basically unspoiled! 

Also, Rach is 32. She's a lawyer. I firmly believe that she's smart enough to see past the physical and not make her decision based off of lust. Especially since she said she used her head more towards the end of the process. Whoever she chooses, I'm gonna fan for them because I trust her judgement and I love seeing her gush about how much her fiance loves her. JMO.
I feel bad for the people invested but ur post is funny. Why make it easy huh, being the season of firsts, my tush,laugh out loud.
I too think she is intelligent and will choose who is a better fit for her.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 Empty Re: Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7

Post by GuardianAngel Mon Jun 05, 2017 4:16 pm



I'm seeing this one way. If one would take away the perception of someone or something, it would be very clear to them.


________________________________________________________________________________________________



All Rules

Posts without source will be deleted.  

NO SPOILERS in any threads other than those titled Spoilers.  


“Dogs leave pawprints on our hearts” – Author Unknown
GuardianAngel
GuardianAngel
Admin
Admin

Female Posts : 71775
Join date : 2011-04-04

https://www.bachandbachettefans.net

Back to top Go down

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 Empty Re: Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7

Post by Bee Mon Jun 05, 2017 4:17 pm

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 ?taken-by=natalieshabtai https://www.instagram.com/p/BU9zH3jDwCz/?taken-by=natalieshabtai


Rachel looks stunning in this picture


Last edited by Bee on Mon Jun 05, 2017 4:20 pm; edited 1 time in total

Bee

Posts : 261
Join date : 2017-01-24

Back to top Go down

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 Empty Re: Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7

Post by locafolle Mon Jun 05, 2017 4:20 pm

Her post in instagram seems to refer to the publication on TMZ today that she was with Peter, which would be a contractual violation. It is not Peter but he looks like Peter.

locafolle

Posts : 1
Join date : 2017-06-05

Back to top Go down

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 Empty Re: Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7

Post by Guest Mon Jun 05, 2017 4:21 pm

Is the poster that deciphers the editing of the show not watching this season (I can't think of the name). I always enjoy is pov.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 Empty Re: Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7

Post by Guest Mon Jun 05, 2017 4:24 pm

pvpr wrote:I am LIVING for this messiness Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 3806527698 IMO either the initial 'Peter is F1' info was a foiler but RS managed to get the correct info, or this new 'Bryan is F1' info is the foiler because they finally have a season where the lead was torn between two people and they want to play it up as much as possible, since Kaitlyn ruined their last chance at a legit foiler (no way anyone would've bought that JoJo or Nick picked Robby and Raven IMO). 

snipped to shorten
I agree so much! This is great and actually what I hope for every season. I don't see what's so hard about floating conflicting info to RS unless he literally gets a lead calling him or photo evidence of the FRC and knows for sure. After one of the most lackluster seasons in years (IMO) I think TPTB really realized they needed to up their game. IMO the first 2 eps this season have been full entertainment from start to end. Great lead, great tv and now great love triangle with an unknown ending (all IMO). I hope it keeps coming all season. I love it! It is so fun.

And one of the guys is obviously playing along here like a good company man JMO. Either Peter with all of his likes or Bryan changing his tune from liking next Bach tweets to disappearing during safe house weekends. I know who I'm guessing it is, but we'll find out in time either way Smiley . JMO.

Really kudos to TPTB for the whole season so far from me. JMO.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 Empty Re: Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7

Post by GuardianAngel Mon Jun 05, 2017 4:25 pm

locafolle wrote:Her post in instagram seems to refer to the publication on TMZ  today that she was with Peter, which would be  a contractual violation. It is not Peter but he looks like Peter.

Maybe TMZ needs to read our forum. We had speculated on that awhile back now. A member, I'm sorry I forget who, brought that over. That guy looks nothing like Peter IMHO, but yes maybe Rachel just saw it? I don't think she would defend herself though, because the leads aren't going to be out and about with their F1 so it might be ridiculous to her that they are assuming she was with Peter. The article IMO is a click grabber.

http://www.tmz.com/2017/06/05/bachelorette-rachel-lindsay-winner/


________________________________________________________________________________________________



All Rules

Posts without source will be deleted.  

NO SPOILERS in any threads other than those titled Spoilers.  


“Dogs leave pawprints on our hearts” – Author Unknown
GuardianAngel
GuardianAngel
Admin
Admin

Female Posts : 71775
Join date : 2011-04-04

https://www.bachandbachettefans.net

Back to top Go down

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7 - Page 33 Empty Re: Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 33 of 79 Previous  1 ... 18 ... 32, 33, 34 ... 56 ... 79  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7

+67
BacheloretteFan425
loveisallweneed
composer53
mercieme
gramercypark10
Lawkid
Luvstruck
Zaynab
flojo031
Santaluces92
2observe
clhouse
Tiggerlgh
BachelorBabe512
Dare2b...
Dookam23
Seabear
queenb231985
Norcalgal
MiaHawk
julychild
locafolle
puppiesandkittens
Nillay
crunchycheeto
Duke702
kraft33
Cila51290
Diana
BachIsMyGuiltyPleasure
AllAboutLove
bluejay25
dee
Sprite
moviechicka
Pachelshipper
kimberlyg
coolangel
bluwavz
Miyala
wickedwitch
Dessler
IrelandRose
gurlbrit
brownravens
Just Looking
Rosepetal
mindless
renaissance
TLTF
Ladybug82
Bee
bleuberry
ReneeM
Acrunch
sdmom
Carine
Alanna
jjjami
Hotmomma
Topazgold
Mia_Leoni
lleyki
emusha
stuckinsc
Kashathediva
GuardianAngel
71 posters
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum