Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - 11 - Discussion #9

Yes to the above posts, Nick was just saying things the way they actually were on the plane. But people thought he was a bitter loser back then. With MeAndi Dorfman's new book coming out and more more news about that book, Nick really is smelling like a rose now (he has already been in my book)

And I would love to know, those who crucified Nick after he popped the sex question during ATFR, what they have to say now about MeAndi (I mean the general viewer as whole, not directed to anyone in this forum).

^^^ I'll bite regarding the last question, I still think that what he did on the AFTR was in very bad taste. That is not to say I think Andi sleeping with him in the first place was right either but dude you do not kiss and tell. That goes for Nick back then and 100000000 times over for Andi now. 
MO. It was MO that he should not have then and still is despite what crap Andi is pulling now.

Nick's vid, to me, is the definition of hindsight is 20-20. 
Watching that video now shows how on target he was.

Kashathediva wrote:Nick's vid, to me, is the definition of hindsight is 20-20. 
Watching that video now shows how on target he was.

Have we seen anything yet specifically regarding him from the book excerpts?

nd4reality wrote:... I still think that what he did on the AFTR was in very bad taste...

Nick tried to reach out and speak to Andi in private but production/Andi wouldn't allow it. He genuinely cared for Andi and she led him to believe he was going to be the F1. Nick wanted answers. I don't fault him for asking that question. He got the closure he needed and moved on JMO

Its my opinion that what Nick said on the AFTR was bad taste. And I totally fault him for that.
There was no gun to his head.

Shockingly I don't feel any differently for Nick. His shenanigans don't suddenly become acceptable for me.

Has there ever been a more polarizing f1/f2/lead triangle?

nd4reality wrote:Its my opinion that what Nick said on the AFTR was bad taste. And I totally fault him for that.
There was no gun to his head.

Thank you. Just because Josh and Andi are as bad, it excuses Ick? No I'm okay, thanks.

I am sure if Nick's being asked about Andi's book, he will answer "I've moved on. With her the best".
He has never said one single bad thing about Josh or Andi (I don't count the video because of the circumstances) or responded negatively to sm comments. I respect him for that regardless of the AFTR comments.
JMO

What Nick said ATFR was said in the heat of the moment. He was thinking about it for months, but I don't think he intended it to come out in that way. She hurt him and the rawness of that hurt came out in a biting way... On live national tv. That is the part that people see as inappropriate. But how else was he supposed to get answers? She wouldn't talk with him in private.

Nick's actions were selfish to be sure, but I don't think they were intentionally said only to hurt Andi. But to make his point. She hurt him. She wasn't in love with him, why "make love" with him? You almost couldn't have set him up better for that play on words. I think the reposnse in his head escaped his lips faster than he intended. They came out before he censored them. Raw.

Doesn't make it right, just makes it real. Isn't that what reality tv is supposed to be? I can't fault him for being real.

blueberry wrote:...Has there ever been a more polarizing f1/f2/lead triangle?

Nick/Shawn/Kaitlyn gave "lead triangle" a new meaning JMO

jen689 wrote:

blueberry wrote:...Has there ever been a more polarizing f1/f2/lead triangle?

Nick/Shawn/Kaitlyn gave "lead triangle" a new meaning JMO

Omg I had a brain lapse, how could I forget?!