Bachelor Canada - Season 2 - Tim Warmels - *Sleuthing - *Spoilers* - *Speculation* - Trisha

AllAboutLove wrote:

4health wrote:

AllAboutLove wrote:^ You are correct about the monkey pic. The picture I referred to in my comments is not on there. He removed it. It was a beach scene that he posted then removed but I think I messed the date up on that (May 30 I think it is). Would have to recheck. Loved the monkey intelligence post... how intelligence is questioning everything you think you know. Hey, at least we question on here as well

Thanks....I still see all the beach, sunset pictures so I am not sure which one you are referring..but all is good.

It is this one [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] Captioned with "Somewhere here"... All is good though

sorry missed the train.. why monkey? why is this pic so important or not?

Could I ask posters who think maybe "blog gate" wasnt actually a "blog gate": what did you think about "video gate" (NickV) (and later "Golden Ribbon gate" - yes I know I just made it up but that was my 200% proof!), "fridge gate" (while Chantal was Brad's spoiled F1), "photo gate" (Ben F proposing to Courtney) and "necklace gate" (Sam's in Bach Aus 2)?

I simply want to try and figure out when does a proof become a proof, or if that is never?

And to clarify:
I am not saying you dont have the right to doubt any of these, just wondering what it would take to be 100%?

sophienette wrote:Could I ask posters who think maybe "blog gate" wasnt actually a "blog gate": what did you think about "video gate" (NickV) (and later "Golden Ribbon gate" - yes I know I just made it up but that was my 200% proof!), "fridge gate" (while Chantal was Brad's spoiled F1), "photo gate" (Ben F proposing to Courtney) and "necklace gate" (Sam's in Bach Aus 2)?

I simply want to try and figure out when does a proof become a proof, or if that is never?

And to clarify:
I am not saying you dont have the right to doubt any of these, just wondering what it would take to be 100%?

I sure am interested in the answer.

The timeline of return around 6/3 seems realistic.  I was looking at a couple of the crew's IG and the first posting I notice was for 6/3.  Check carly_horse on IG.

I noticed that April liked on FB someone's post from the filming crew together. That was nice.

Ever since I found out you can see what a person liked on facebook, I went and looked at April's. She sure wants to travel!

sophienette wrote:Could I ask posters who think maybe "blog gate" wasnt actually a "blog gate": what did you think about "video gate" (NickV) (and later "Golden Ribbon gate" - yes I know I just made it up but that was my 200% proof!), "fridge gate" (while Chantal was Brad's spoiled F1), "photo gate" (Ben F proposing to Courtney) and "necklace gate" (Sam's in Bach Aus 2)?

I simply want to try and figure out when does a proof become a proof, or if that is never?

And to clarify:
I am not saying you dont have the right to doubt any of these, just wondering what it would take to be 100%?

watching the last seconds of the finale?

HEA wrote:

sophienette wrote:Could I ask posters who think maybe "blog gate" wasnt actually a "blog gate": what did you think about "video gate" (NickV) (and later "Golden Ribbon gate" - yes I know I just made it up but that was my 200% proof!), "fridge gate" (while Chantal was Brad's spoiled F1), "photo gate" (Ben F proposing to Courtney) and "necklace gate" (Sam's in Bach Aus 2)?

I simply want to try and figure out when does a proof become a proof, or if that is never?

And to clarify:
I am not saying you dont have the right to doubt any of these, just wondering what it would take to be 100%?

watching the last seconds of the finale?

so why sleuth? Again it's an honest question! I am not being sarcastic, just trying to understand.

sophienette wrote:Could I ask posters who think maybe "blog gate" wasnt actually a "blog gate": what did you think about "video gate" (NickV) (and later "Golden Ribbon gate" - yes I know I just made it up but that was my 200% proof!), "fridge gate" (while Chantal was Brad's spoiled F1), "photo gate" (Ben F proposing to Courtney) and "necklace gate" (Sam's in Bach Aus 2)?

I simply want to try and figure out when does a proof become a proof, or if that is never?

And to clarify:
I am not saying you dont have the right to doubt any of these, just wondering what it would take to be 100%?

It depends on who the proof is in favour of and who the person reading the proof's favourite is.

Proof becomes 100% when the FRC / ATFR airs or when there is a solid s/cap confirming eg Ed in the fountain in Spain when others saw him at home. This wasn't proof he was the F1 but it was proof that he returns at some point even though there was proof he was home.

To a sleuther, who makes decisions based on fact, may be 99.9% prior to the FRC/ATFR airing or 100% prior to airing when there is solid proof by way of seeing with their own eyes. I was part of fridgegate too, that was an awesome discovery. That pushed the % from 50-50 to 99%. Lets not forget MiniDiva's discovery of Roberto transferring his job from SC to LA prior to the FRC airing. For me that was another 99%. You can always justify any theory in any situation, it depends on the sleuther. If they are invested in a favourite, they will see things differently than those who are not.

That's how I look at it.

atem wrote:I noticed that April liked on FB someone's post from the filming crew together.  That was nice.

Ever since I found out you can see what a person liked on facebook, I went and looked at April's.  She sure wants to travel!  

How do you look at someone's likes? To me her profile is so private

sophienette wrote:

HEA wrote:

sophienette wrote:Could I ask posters who think maybe "blog gate" wasnt actually a "blog gate": what did you think about "video gate" (NickV) (and later "Golden Ribbon gate" - yes I know I just made it up but that was my 200% proof!), "fridge gate" (while Chantal was Brad's spoiled F1), "photo gate" (Ben F proposing to Courtney) and "necklace gate" (Sam's in Bach Aus 2)?

I simply want to try and figure out when does a proof become a proof, or if that is never?

And to clarify:
I am not saying you dont have the right to doubt any of these, just wondering what it would take to be 100%?

watching the last seconds of the finale?

so why sleuth? Again it's an honest question!  I am not being sarcastic, just trying to understand.

for me, sleuthing is about finding out the truth, figuring out the whole story by piecing together everything we know, trying to figure out what really went on during the season, things that the edit doesn't always show us.  It's not about picking a favorite and then hammering in puzzle pieces, ones that don't fit to suit what you want to happen... it's about peeling back the layers and figuring it all out.  Sometimes I like the outcome and sometimes I don't... but I'm not afraid of finding out the truth.  That's what I'm loving about BachCan and no RS, we get to figure it out without being told the end before it even starts.  We get to follow our noses, so to speak, and analyze the edit and SM to make conclusions about the ending.

eta - you explained it much better GA... I guess I was typing when you posted yours... other wise I would have just agreed with you

GuardianAngel wrote:

sophienette wrote:Could I ask posters who think maybe "blog gate" wasnt actually a "blog gate": what did you think about "video gate" (NickV) (and later "Golden Ribbon gate" - yes I know I just made it up but that was my 200% proof!), "fridge gate" (while Chantal was Brad's spoiled F1), "photo gate" (Ben F proposing to Courtney) and "necklace gate" (Sam's in Bach Aus 2)?

I simply want to try and figure out when does a proof become a proof, or if that is never?

And to clarify:
I am not saying you dont have the right to doubt any of these, just wondering what it would take to be 100%?

It depends on who the proof is in favour of and who the person reading the proof's favourite is.

Proof becomes 100% when the FRC / ATFR airs or when there is a solid s/cap confirming eg Ed in the fountain in Spain when others saw him at home. This wasn't proof he was the F1 but it was proof that he returns at some point even though there was proof he was home.

To a sleuther, who makes decisions based on fact, may be 99.9% prior to the FRC/ATFR airing or 100% prior to airing when there is solid proof by way of seeing with their own eyes. I was part of fridgegate too, that was an awesome discovery. That pushed the % from 50-50 to 99%. Lets not forget MiniDiva's discovery of Roberto transferring his job from SC to LA prior to the FRC airing. For me that was another 99%. You can always justify any theory in any situation, it depends on the sleuther. If they are invested in a favourite, they will see things differently than those who are not.

That's how I look at it.

i agree. I am right now convinced at 99% it is april and 1% still a chance it is Trish.

but right now we have nothing that convince me at 100%  

so yes, I will still root for Trish until my last minute because it is fun! :whistle: