Re: Final Rose Ceremony - Screencaps - Thread #2

by ironcat Sat Jul 02, 2011 11:37 am

Living wrote:

I have to agree that the suit on the right does not look like it has pockets in the photo. That said, aren't pockets of some kind on the jacket of men's suits pretty standard? Do they make pocketless suit jackets? Maybe they were photoshopped out, or the lighting is just making them "disappear"?

I'm going to investigate a little.

by rc49ers Sat Jul 02, 2011 11:47 am

Maybe i'm seeing things but i do see a pocket in both pictures , its next to the two creases ,thats what it looks like to me .

rose

by beader Sat Jul 02, 2011 12:13 pm

I played with the suit picture on the right and there is definitely a pocket--even the flap is showing. Sorry, I don't know how to post it. His arm is covering most of it, but I can see about 1/4 of it on the right edge of the pocket.

by nutty1 Sat Jul 02, 2011 12:46 pm

Somewhere, seems like forever ago, someone lightened that pic and you could see a suit pocket.

by jelle Sat Jul 02, 2011 1:56 pm

Living wrote:Which of these is the real Ashley??
a) The Bracelet as disappeared for the real FRC.
b) The earings have come on for the real RC and
c) Ashley's boobs grew for some of the SC and disappeared again for the real RC.....
d) Even the hair changes....

Pictures 1, 3, 5 and 6 were taken at Namale Resort. Pictures 2 and 4 at the actual FRC.

Why they did the shots at Namale is anyones guess right now, but her hair is definately different so her earings are hidden for the most part in the Namale shots, and we cannot see her right wrist to see her bracelet in the FRC shots.

Pictures 1, 5 and 6 could be a different person, I suppose, at the least, they are flipped. Picture 3 is definitely Ashley at Namele Resort though, but her hair looks different than 1, 5 and 6, but perhaps that is just timing. They ae all at Namale. Was this a photoshoot for the mags and they slipped them in to confuse things?

The dress is the same. Note in pictures 3 and 4, one which is Namale and one the FRC, the straps go from the center of the gown in front over each shoulder and attach on the sides.

The question for me is definately, why is she wearing her dress at Namele Resort before the FRC at all? scratch

by Chacharo Sat Jul 02, 2011 2:13 pm

jelle wrote:
Living wrote:Which of these is the real Ashley??
a) The Bracelet as disappeared for the real FRC.
b) The earings have come on for the real RC and
c) Ashley's boobs grew for some of the SC and disappeared again for the real RC.....
d) Even the hair changes....

Pictures 1, 3, 5 and 6 were taken at Namale Resort. Pictures 2 and 4 at the actual FRC.

Why they did the shots at Namale is anyones guess right now, but her hair is definately different so her earings are hidden for the most part in the Namale shots, and we cannot see her right wrist to see her bracelet in the FRC shots.

Pictures 1, 5 and 6 could be a different person, I suppose, at the least, they are flipped. Picture 3 is definitely Ashley at Namele Resort though, but her hair looks different than 1, 5 and 6, but perhaps that is just timing. They ae all at Namale. Was this a photoshoot for the mags and they slipped them in to confuse things?

The dress is the same. Note in pictures 3 and 4, one which is Namale and one the FRC, the straps go from the center of the gown in front over each shoulder and attach on the sides.

The question for me is definately, why is she wearing her dress at Namele Resort before the FRC at all?

I think 1, 5, 6 are at one location and 2, 3, 4 are the FRC. The straps look different to me. In 2, 3, 4 the straps comes together at her cleavage in the front. in 1, 5, 6 they look like regular spaghetti straps on either side.

by jelle Sat Jul 02, 2011 2:22 pm

Picture 3 is at Namale Resort - per the railings. Which indicates that the dress in 3 (at Namale) and 4 (at the FRC) are indeed the same.

Pictures 1, 5, 6 are similar to each other, but in the same location as 3. They ae also flipped from #3.

by Living Sat Jul 02, 2011 2:51 pm

ironcat wrote:
Living wrote:

I have to agree that the suit on the right does not look like it has pockets in the photo. That said, aren't pockets of some kind on the jacket of men's suits pretty standard? Do they make pocketless suit jackets? Maybe they were photoshopped out, or the lighting is just making them "disappear"?

I'm going to investigate a little.

Suits usually should have pockets. There is the slit and flap (material hanging out) kind. Instead of saying no pockets, I should have said no Flap pockets.

by ironcat Sat Jul 02, 2011 2:56 pm

Living wrote:
ironcat wrote:
Living wrote:

I have to agree that the suit on the right does not look like it has pockets in the photo. That said, aren't pockets of some kind on the jacket of men's suits pretty standard? Do they make pocketless suit jackets? Maybe they were photoshopped out, or the lighting is just making them "disappear"?

I'm going to investigate a little.

Suits usually should have pockets. There is the slit and flap (material hanging out) kind. Instead of saying no pockets, I should have said no Flap pockets.

After doing some research on this subject: on a well made suit with flap pockets, the flap is made so that it can be tucked in to look like there is no flap. I know when I wear a suit (ladies, of course) with flap pockets, sometimes the pocket gets tucked in without me even realizing it. So I don't think it's definitive that the flap isn't showing.

by Guest Sat Jul 02, 2011 2:58 pm

To me, th enlarged photos of Ben and JP's watches is the biggest clue and the no hair on the shirt with the vertical stripes. DSG has Ben's watch. JP's is also squared, but has a border around the square in jewel tone.

by Guest Sat Jul 02, 2011 3:00 pm

cupcakes wrote:

This was the comparisons done by CupCakes on the watches. Big clue. If you look at DSG pulling his jacket together, it's Ben's watch.

by Living Sat Jul 02, 2011 3:07 pm

ironcat wrote:
Living wrote:
ironcat wrote:
Living wrote:

I have to agree that the suit on the right does not look like it has pockets in the photo. That said, aren't pockets of some kind on the jacket of men's suits pretty standard? Do they make pocketless suit jackets? Maybe they were photoshopped out, or the lighting is just making them "disappear"?

I'm going to investigate a little.

Suits usually should have pockets. There is the slit and flap (material hanging out) kind. Instead of saying no pockets, I should have said no Flap pockets.

After doing some research on this subject: on a well made suit with flap pockets, the flap is made so that it can be tucked in to look like there is no flap. I know when I wear a suit (ladies, of course) with flap pockets, sometimes the pocket gets tucked in without me even realizing it. So I don't think it's definitive that the flap isn't showing.

I definitely cannot see the flat. If there was a flap (it is not the only kind of pocket for suits), a bit of it should have been showing due to the amount of fabric we see. On the other hand, the lining makes it different afterall.

by Sponsored content