Episode 2 - 1/14 - Bachelor 17 - Discussion - Spoilers

-SarahP wrote:Does anyone know where I can watch last night's episode? I've been searching for it but can't find it.. :Frown:

LoveDovez wrote:

-SarahP wrote:Does anyone know where I can watch last night's episode? I've been searching for it but can't find it.. :Frown:

Sarah, Hulu.com normally always has them the day after.. Try there. : )

-SarahP wrote:

LoveDovez wrote:

-SarahP wrote:Does anyone know where I can watch last night's episode? I've been searching for it but can't find it.. :Frown:

Sarah, Hulu.com normally always has them the day after.. Try there. : )

I've tried on Hulu.com but it can only be viewed in the US and I live in Europe. Thanks anyways! :Smiley:

Kashathediva wrote:

veg_out wrote:

Kashathediva wrote:
It had to do with the fact Yawn was emphasizing how important the convo was yet could not remember her name and the editors chose to leave that in. That was not an oops on the editors part, it was an on purpose.

Hiya, Kash!! :Smiley: Did you get a chance to watch Sean on Kimmel? He pretty much admits to Jimmy that he couldn't keep the details straight on all the girls. Jimmy followed up with the suggestion that he should probably eliminate those girls since that reaction signals a lack of interest. Sean said he fell in line with that reasoning and action.

My take: the diverse cast was more about the show's lawsuit and less about Sean's dating interests. I do think that race doesn't matter to Sean, but that conversation, IMO, was left in there for the show's sake.

Do you think that they left the mistake in there for reasons other than what you previously wrote?

I did catch him on Kimmel. I did think the first episode(prior to seeing Kimmel) that the reason he gave out the roses prior to the RC was details/memory/stress overload and certainly not because he was going Bach Rogue and breaking rules. :giggle: And I agree with Kimmel--it makes him look disinterested by doing that.
I agree with you about the lawsuit comments.
As far as why it was left in there, it was no mistake. The editors and assts. go over and over each frame in detail. I don't think it had anything more or less to do with than just being funny. Yawn maybe trying to make a point that the convo was important to him but the person he was having the convo with(Robyn), not so much.

umngirl wrote:This is just one SC as an example, but I've noticed Catherine and Lesley seem to be around each other quite a bit. Looks like they developed a friendship this season. Maybe it helps that they both seem to stay out of the drama (so far).

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

umngirl wrote:This is just one SC as an example, but I've noticed Catherine and Lesley seem to be around each other quite a bit. Looks like they developed a friendship this season. Maybe it helps that they both seem to stay out of the drama (so far).

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

emiusacska wrote:do we all know which titles are with covers on them

sanlee088 wrote:'The Bachelor': See Kristy's winning Harlequin cover, and the three runners-up -- PHOTOS

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

HowSoonIsNow wrote:

Kashathediva wrote:

veg_out wrote:

Kashathediva wrote:
It had to do with the fact Yawn was emphasizing how important the convo was yet could not remember her name and the editors chose to leave that in. That was not an oops on the editors part, it was an on purpose.

Hiya, Kash!! :Smiley: Did you get a chance to watch Sean on Kimmel? He pretty much admits to Jimmy that he couldn't keep the details straight on all the girls. Jimmy followed up with the suggestion that he should probably eliminate those girls since that reaction signals a lack of interest. Sean said he fell in line with that reasoning and action.

My take: the diverse cast was more about the show's lawsuit and less about Sean's dating interests. I do think that race doesn't matter to Sean, but that conversation, IMO, was left in there for the show's sake.

Do you think that they left the mistake in there for reasons other than what you previously wrote?

I did catch him on Kimmel. I did think the first episode(prior to seeing Kimmel) that the reason he gave out the roses prior to the RC was details/memory/stress overload and certainly not because he was going Bach Rogue and breaking rules. :giggle: And I agree with Kimmel--it makes him look disinterested by doing that.
I agree with you about the lawsuit comments.
As far as why it was left in there, it was no mistake. The editors and assts. go over and over each frame in detail. I don't think it had anything more or less to do with than just being funny. Yawn maybe trying to make a point that the convo was important to him but the person he was having the convo with(Robyn), not so much.

FWIW I just watched the episode on Hulu, and I rewatched the scene twice, and he never calls her Leslie. At the start of the scene, he greets her as "Hello Ms Robin", and he never mentions any names the rest of the convo. Toward the end of the convo, he says "I will say" though it sounds like he's saying "Leslie". (But who knows if they adjust the audio edit before putting the epi on Hulu.)

Also FWIW I dislike it when guys brag about having dating women of every "type". Makes it sound like they've ticked off their checklist of races to "try" before settling down for marriage. The smug look on his face and how proud of himself he seems to be as he explains that he looks beyond race aren't helping. JMO of course.