Re: Rachel Lindsay & Bryan Abasolo - Bachelorette 13 - Discussion - #2

by umngirl Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:11 pm

zoe06 wrote:i believe some of those who say that they have always questioneded bach couples but it is just me or are r&b getting even more shade than anyone has every gotten even Kaitlyn and Shawn said so on their podcast. But i am curious as to why now every one is questiong the shows love timeline, and engagement at the end mainly. since th two times the men didnt' propose they were raked across the coals for it. this has been the set-up for 16 years, but all of a sudden with Rachel is seems people are 10x more skeptical, IMO. or is this the normal hate?

To answer your question, no they aren't getting more shade IMO. Every couple is questioned a lot. That's why every couple has a general thread.

And the engagement hasn't always been necessary or required. It's only in the last six years (minus Juan Pablo) where it always happens. In older seasons there were less engagements.

by Kashathediva Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:12 pm

Sometimes all you need is distance. That alone can do wonders. I know it did for me. LOL Putting me on a coast did wonders for me from counting to 10 a zillion times over the past 26 yrs to kept me out of prison.

by zoe06 Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:18 pm

umngirl wrote:
zoe06 wrote:i believe some of those who say that they have always questioneded bach couples but it is just me or are r&b getting even more shade than anyone has every gotten even Kaitlyn and Shawn said so on their podcast. But i am curious as to why now every one is questiong the shows love timeline, and engagement at the end mainly. since th two times the men didnt' propose they were raked across the coals for it. this has been the set-up for 16 years, but all of a sudden with Rachel is seems people are 10x more skeptical, IMO. or is this the normal hate?

To answer your question, no they aren't getting more shade IMO. Every couple is questioned a lot. That's why every couple has a general thread.

And the engagement hasn't always been necessary or required. It's only in the last six years (minus Juan Pablo) where it always happens. In older seasons there were less engagements.

ok good to know, thanks. I thought Trista got engaged at the end and previous bachelorettes. i aimagine it will die once Ari's season airs or the winter games start.

by Chgohighlife Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:21 pm

umngirl wrote:His hair is so bad.

But the suit more than makes up for it!

by bleuberry Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:43 pm

Rachel has never looked better! Idk who's doing her make up lately but that and her hair looked amazing.

I thought Wendy kinda held back actually laugh out loud

. Rachel did really well and was obviously prepared for Wendy to do what Wendy does.

As for their future plans, I mean, good for them that it sounds like they're still sticking to their jobs. If they take actual steps in that direction (chiro & law), then I'll give them props.

by Kolormiblnd Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:41 pm

Now that I have had time to rewatch WW, I have to give WW props for the way she approached the Race issue. The approach was great IMO. She did not attack. The end of the topic was still cringe worthy but I think she deserves props for the initial finesse. It could have been messier.

by zoe06 Wed Sep 20, 2017 10:22 pm

snipped..

Thanks i was just curious this is the season I first really watched i thought they might have got more since people seem to really not like Bryan and since Kaitlyn and Shawn commented about it on their podcast. i will give Bryan credit that for all the hate he got including from some of the men in the house he is also pretty good at ignoring everyone not hitting back, I think he's beginning to rub off on Rachel in that respect, IMO . *edited*

by **GuardianAngel** Wed Sep 20, 2017 10:41 pm

One of the reason's comparison's in GD is suppose to be minimal is because it goes way off topic. Posts are being deleted.

by albean99 Thu Sep 21, 2017 12:52 am

I watched the WW interview, the first I've watched of them since the finale. WW was okay other than not knowing anything about the show. Rachel seemed to take it pretty well. I didn't see anything from them to change my mind about Bryan or their long-term outlook. I don't know that I buy that they had to pick L.A. because he didn't like Dallas and she didn't like Miami but it's up to them. I don't think it's the best place for a new couple though and will be surprised if they're not trying to do more than their normal jobs. All JMO.

by **Norcalgal** Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 am

Watched the youtube link and didn't find it as rude as all the thread comments made me believe. If anything, I thought WW was the voice representing a lot of doubters about the show.

by quietpal Thu Sep 21, 2017 5:18 am

Cocoasneeze wrote:Maybe they want to do both. They want to continue their respective careers, AND take on any offers sent their way. I see nothing wrong with that. Imo it's just curious that we finally hear from their own mouths, that they plan on to continue their careers, that Bryan is in the process of getting his licence for California, but it can't be taken as the truth, they must be lying. Jmo

That's how it is unfortunately. No matter what they say some believe them and some don't. That's why I say I hope R & B do what they feel is best for them and eliminate the unnecessary noise from outside people (media, SM, etc.) who know diddly squat about their relationship. IMO

by Billysmom Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:27 am

L&s at it again. http://www.lifeandstylemag.com/posts/rachel-and-bryan-still-together-142236?ref=yfp

by Sponsored content