Peter Kraus - Bachelorette 13 - Discussion - #9

Kashathediva wrote:We are sleuthers on this forum! Sleuthing rules!

Does this mean no one can say her IG specifically? or that no one can give a clue? or that no one can ask?

The person I think it is has a private IG. So no sense in naming a name. It's a recent ex. I'm not positive if it's a recent re-follow or if he simply never unfollowed this account and I missed it.

Fwiw, IG tells me the only person Peter has followed in the last few days is Jana Kramer, and she's definitely not an ex.

@coolangel Does the ex have a private IG? Is there a way we can prove it somehow?

I don't think this is recent as in last few days.

Kashathediva wrote:We are sleuthers on this forum! Sleuthing rules!

Im so confused by this! So Basically anyone can say/insinuate whatever they want about Peter, provided it's negative, and no proof needs to be presented?

I don't understand what the mystery is about "who" this ex that Peter followed is? Peters IG is open, his follows are there for everyone to see so why not just say the IG account name for those of us who aren't keeping track of his follows/unfollows?

frostedcupcakes wrote:@coolangel Does the ex have a private IG? Is there a way we can prove it somehow?

I have already said what I wanted to say in my post. I have nothing more to add. She didn't sign up for the show and deserves her privacy IMO.

This is the easiest of sleuthing. I took a SC of Peter's follows, since maybe June. No rules broken im sure, you guys use the info as you wish.





https://www.instagram.com/peterkrauswi/

Not that it's a big deal if he follows an ex, but it's sleuthing right? I can go back all the way to his first follow (Megan Firestone) since he returned from filming, if anyone wants...or just view IG on the web (follows/followers wil be in descending order) to check.

Acrunch wrote:

Kashathediva wrote:We are sleuthers on this forum! Sleuthing rules!

Im so confused by this!  So Basically anyone can say/insinuate whatever they want about Peter, provided it's negative, and no proof needs to be presented?

I don't understand what the mystery is about "who" this ex that Peter followed is?   Peters IG is open, his follows are there for everyone to see so why not just say the IG account name for those of us who aren't keeping track of his follows/unfollows?

Since when is sleuthing on this forum considered negative? That's what's done here.
Nothing that was said was negative.
Peter's IG is open and anyone can look at his IG.
No problem.
The problem is not everyone on his IG has a public account.
If he started to follow or he never unfollowed an ex that has a private account, we are not going to drag that person into a public forum. That is against our rules.

I feel stupid, because I don't see any recent follows that could be potential ex-girlfriends. Eh, doesn't matter much anyways. He's a single guy and if a girl was willing to deal with her boyfriend going on the show for his brand and then takes him back after he told another women he loved her and would propose to her so he wouldn't lose her, I have very little sympathy for her. Have some self-respect, women! IMO.

What I found can't be a recent follow.
I said up post about an hour ago that it might never have been an unfollow to begin with. That's all I can/will say since it's not public.
@Aria I totally agree.

The way I read refollow post was that the refollow was from the former girlfriend not Peter. Maybe my interpretation is wrong but that is how a I read the post.
JMO