Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #7

Bach/ette wrote:@Cila51290 Peter's business is a traveling business. It is not housed in any centralized location. All he would have to do is get his truck and go.

Doesn't he have an actual store front though?  From the Kampsfit Instagram page it looks as if he actually has a gym

ReneeM wrote:Rachel's  People Blog is up.

This one was kind of a dud for me. It was hard to be engaged when so much time was devoted to Anthony and Eric. And the squad . All JMO

@Max64 It's not his gym. He just works there.

Bach/ette wrote:@Max64 It's not his gym. He just works there.

Gotcha, thanks!

Haha! IMO She wants people to know Bryan has more depth and they do have conversations and are not just sucking face.

I see you Rachel! I see you!

All JMO

coolangel wrote:Haha! IMO She wants people to know Bryan has more depth and they do have conversations and are not just sucking face.

I see you Rachel! I see you!

All JMO

Exacly, this made me totally believe that Bryan is her F1. This was her way of defending him, telling us that he is not shallow! I lost my hope of Peter being F1 now

Yea sounds to me like she wants people to know that her relationship with Bryan has depth - could maybe be a protective response to how people are being so critical of him and her relationship with him if she picked him (with the new spoiler).

all jmo

emusha wrote:Yea sounds to me like she wants people to know that her relationship with Bryan has depth - could maybe be a protective response to how people are being so critical of him and her relationship with him if she picked him (with the new spoiler).

all jmo

Or just yanking our chain

I do think that showing her f1 as "perfect" doesn't get us far enough for next lead material. They're better off showing her f1 as whatever and the next lead as "perfect." Since Peter so far has been spotless, it further lends itself as potential evidence that he's f2 and next lead.

@Kashathediva Isn't the point of the blog to review what viewers see. I mean ultimately you can justify any theory if you're basing it on something that hypothetically went on off air. JMO

@Bach/ette  You would have to ask Rachel or if it's not Rachel writing the blog the person who is. They don't often answer that way. Maybe she is referring to the dance off as being the men dancing for dollars that we all saw? We don't know if this blog was written this morning or after she viewed the show last night. It may have been submitted for today and written prior to her viewing.

Actually, many leads including Rachel have used the blog to share stuff we did not see. Like Peter giving his sandwich to a homeless man. The blogs are also reviewed and approved (if not written) by TPTB. This is known fact from pasts seasons.

Bach/ette wrote:@Kashathediva Isn't the point of the blog to review what viewers see. I mean ultimately you can justify any theory if you're basing it on something that hypothetically went on off air. JMO

The blog is going to be prepared by Rachel and TPTB. Nothing is sent to print unless they ok it. We didn't see a conversation with Bryan about his marriage, but it's in her blog. Viewers didn't see that conversation. One season we saw the previous season's 'ett's name in there, which tells us they sometimes basically use a template.

As far as the dance off, I'm thinking it's just in general, all the guys dancing.