Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #2

Also using Nick's cause he started with 30 and jillian Harris's cause she too started with 30.  That's where I am getting my numbers from and even starting at 30, they both were down to the usual numbers by this time in the filming.

On a side note, it seems like my preseason sleuthing is panning out as I thought they could be in Copenhagen. If they go to Stockholm as I suspect, there are a couple of places that were visited....wonder if they'd go to the Royal Palace of Sweden or the Swedish Music Hall of Fame.

@SarahMariaDK Thanks for reporting back!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2sJnxKnpt0

A promo for Rachel's season

^Thanks for sharing. So nothing new there.

quietpal wrote:^Thanks for sharing. So nothing new there.

Unfortunately no

Does MF typically tweet once per location or is it dependant on the season?

IMO, there is very little rhyme or reason to MF's tweets, the amount of or meaning. He tweets whatever he wants, when he wants to, IMO.  Most of the time they are cryptic and give little away.  Which is why we copy them, speculate alittle and often times end up basically sitting it aside to figure out the real meaning when we have more puzzle pieces to work with.

JMO

According to RS, Bryan received the first impression rose. So either he, or the anonymous source has incorrect information?

hae1001 wrote:According to RS, Bryan received the first impression rose. So either he, or the anonymous source has incorrect information?

I was coming to comment on that as well... That's weird! I thought it was Peter.

He also wrote that :

“There was a picture that I received yesterday of Rachel on her 1-on-1 in Denmark, but I’ll save that until later. Very clear on who it is and I’m surprised more pictures didn’t get out publicly since they were in a pretty popular place in Denmark and people were around them.“
Source: RS

Cant wait to see who it is!

Maybe there were multiple FIR's and only one name was mentioned.  There are been multiples in the past a couple times.

At this point, I think I believe the source more than RS, because I see no reason for them to have lied or mislead with all the other info they shared.  But, stranger things have happened, we'll see how it plays out.

JMO

ETA: Please make note you give credit to RS as the source, but do not link to his site. We always source and give credit, even when he does not return the favor.

When my anonymous source told me that peter got the FIR I believed him.