Rachel Lindsay - Bachelor 21 - *Sleuthing Spoilers* - #2

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] I am wondering if she will be able to do it, also it will go towards charity would there be a reason she will not be able to?
They can make it work find a nice dress that fits the shoes and when they do the toast after introductions Rachel can use the glass.

The contestants go on ellen through the producers so yes she will be allowed to do it. JMO

They could also have one of the men during the M&G (probably one that TPTB think will go far) bring the wine glass and shoes to Rachel to break the ice during introduction time.

She gave it personal to Rachel so she will be the one bringing it. Maybe she will have a dress to match the shoes. . The men better bring a thick skin, as she said at home, any colour are allow to enter but just have a thick skin. IMOWs.

They used the same rose glass case used in the new beauty and the beast movie during the New Orleans date bc it was sponsored by the movie

reason wrote:She gave it personal to Rachel so she will be the one bringing it.  Maybe she will have a dress to match the shoes. .  The men better bring a thick skin, as she said at home, any colour are allow to enter but just have a thick skin. IMOWs.

Production could easily take it to give to a certain man.

Kashathediva wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
It's funny you mentioned these two particular leads. These were the leads I was referring to in my above post. GMTA.

I think it's going to be a bumpy ride for Rachel and she won't come out of this unscathed at all, no matter how tough of a skin she may claim to have.

I always keep in mind that if these contestants were that much different from each other then in the case of Rachel, she wouldn't have gone on this show in the first place. To me it IS about fame and opportunity and someone with her job she is choosing that over her job no matter how I slice it.

Could she go back to her job or do something else with it down the road? Sure. But I always look at it now, especially in 2017 with SM and opportunities far different from leads of the past when this was not so prevalent, that it is more likely IMO that choosing to be the lead is to depart from one's current occupation than to go right back to it.

Actions speak louder than words, so at the moment I will expect her to use this as a platform to push herself into something else and not expect her to go back to her "normal" life or make her seem any different from anyone else that would be the lead if it wasn't her. If anything, her trading her current job for this gig says even more about how much she may be willing to give up for fame/opportunity and the so-called possibility of love (no guarantee there like the other options).

jmo

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Aww, Rachel. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] by @[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I think the premise of the show maybe about finding possible love, but in reality it is a springboard for showcasing and branding yourself.
I hope that she keeps on the right side of TPTB. Poorly chosen words do not usually work out well for a cast person. This is a family she is joining and not creating.

What did Rachel and her little groupies say about Vanessa in a IG story ?

I am bringing a few posts over from the Vanessa thread as I think they will be better here. Please bear with me.

Kashathediva wrote:IDK. There is certainly a diplomatic way to answer these kind of questions without making yourself or another person come off looking poorly. So, imo, no matter how a question is asked, something politically correct could have been a response.

Per Ileyk:

i I agree. Just responding to those wondering why they would just randomly make those comments in the video. You know, I'm still not going to say anything negative about Rachel or any of the women to be honest because I fervently hate pitting women against each other. I wish everyone would move on but it is what it is. That said, I can't say I'm that surprised by this based on Rachel's sister's Facebook post after the volleyball episode where she explained to followers about what wasn't shown regarding the volleyball game.

Apparently in the post she said the winners were supposed to get more time but because Vanessa threw a tantrum because she wasn't getting attention for once, Nick kept all the women (again that may not be the exact quote). Well let's face it, Rachel's sister was not there so she could have only gotten that version of what happened from one person. And I didn't want to judge Rachel for her sister's post but again, the sister's opinion of Vanessa could not have come from her when she wasn't even on the show and I'm going to take a wild guess and say she's never met Vanessa in her life.