SELECT CONTENT

Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers*

Page 12 of 48 Previous  1 ... 7 ... 11, 12, 13 ... 30 ... 48  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers* - Page 12 Empty Re: Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers*

Post by Pandora Mon Jan 16, 2017 10:06 am

I don't understand why anyone cares about Corinne taking her top off on a group date in which another woman is already topless.  IMO the scenario is determines what is appropriate, and the photographer even thought she did the best job with the task at hand.  To me, she had the best energy and a lot of the other women seemed to lack confidence, which made the other photo shoots awkward.  I could take or leave the boob grab and having her brag about it afterward, but I don't find it scandalous and even think it made sense for that group date.  Why again should she worry about the other women on the date?

I think what we will see more of, however, if the whipped cream incident or her sneaking to his room end up happening, is Corinne becoming increasingly inappropriate.  Topless during a photo shoot? Just watch America's Next Top Model or look at any ad campaign.  

Randomly decorating yourself with whipped cream? Casually suggesting sex at a weird moment? Not so much.  I don't think Nick will have any issue distinguishing between what's good timing or not.  I think he finds her attractive and appreciates her boldness at least so far, but obviously does not find her irresistable.
Pandora
Pandora

Posts : 31
Join date : 2015-01-07

Back to top Go down

Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers* - Page 12 Empty Re: Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers*

Post by Catdwoman50 Mon Jan 16, 2017 10:57 am

AB whip cream- a lot of that preview is left to the imagination. I imagine Corrine showing him the whip cream, Nick saying "I don't think this is a good idea" then Corrine takes some and smears it on Nicks lips. The lean we see is Nick trying to get his hand up to his lip faster to wipe off said cream. But that is my imagination and I may be proven wrong come tomorrow's episode


Need to do something productive and stop hanging out in this forum (after Nick's season)
Catdwoman50
Catdwoman50

Female Posts : 1684
Join date : 2013-02-11

Back to top Go down

Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers* - Page 12 Empty Re: Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers*

Post by Sprite Mon Jan 16, 2017 1:19 pm

Pandora wrote:I don't understand why anyone cares about Corinne taking her top off on a group date in which another woman is already topless.  IMO the scenario is determines what is appropriate, and the photographer even thought she did the best job with the task at hand.  To me, she had the best energy and a lot of the other women seemed to lack confidence, which made the other photo shoots awkward.  I could take or leave the boob grab and having her brag about it afterward, but I don't find it scandalous and even think it made sense for that group date.  Why again should she worry about the other women on the date?

I think what we will see more of, however, if the whipped cream incident or her sneaking to his room end up happening, is Corinne becoming increasingly inappropriate.  Topless during a photo shoot? Just watch America's Next Top Model or look at any ad campaign.  

Randomly decorating yourself with whipped cream? Casually suggesting sex at a weird moment? Not so much.  I don't think Nick will have any issue distinguishing between what's good timing or not.  I think he finds her attractive and appreciates her boldness at least so far, but obviously does not find her irresistable.


I think there are several differences for me. The first is that the other topless woman was asked to be that way from the start and her goodies were strategically covered so nothing showed. Almost like a one piece. She also didn't throw it in the others faces. Corinne wasn't asked. In fact, the only reason she took her top off was because she was jealous that she might be upstaged. Second, she not only took everything off, she deliberately flashed everyone, shoved herself against Nick and then put his hands on her boobs. Yes, you see this in ads and ANTM, but this isn't that and nobody asked her to do that.

Personally, I didn't think she had the best energy. I thought Alexis and Vanessa had just as good energy, without making anyone else feel uncomfortable and bringing down the energy of the whole thing. Naturally, we weren't shown as much time with them because they weren't naked.

I also don't think the photographer picked Corinne. I strongly suspect it was the producers since she was outrageous and ticked off the other women and caused unnecessary drama. The rest of her shtick is the same....drunk nudged by producers to create more drama and get her azz to BIP. Not really funny or amusing or all in good fun. More like tacky and boring....and that is not because I am offended by nudity...just not a fan of anything forced.


You could be the juiciest, most ripe peach, but there is still going to be someone who doesn't like peaches.
Sprite
Sprite
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 18266
Join date : 2011-12-04
Location : London ON

Back to top Go down

Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers* - Page 12 Empty Re: Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers*

Post by northernviewer Mon Jan 16, 2017 1:33 pm

Sprite wrote:
Pandora wrote:I don't understand why anyone cares about Corinne taking her top off on a group date in which another woman is already topless.  IMO the scenario is determines what is appropriate, and the photographer even thought she did the best job with the task at hand.  To me, she had the best energy and a lot of the other women seemed to lack confidence, which made the other photo shoots awkward.  I could take or leave the boob grab and having her brag about it afterward, but I don't find it scandalous and even think it made sense for that group date.  Why again should she worry about the other women on the date?

I think what we will see more of, however, if the whipped cream incident or her sneaking to his room end up happening, is Corinne becoming increasingly inappropriate.  Topless during a photo shoot? Just watch America's Next Top Model or look at any ad campaign.  

Randomly decorating yourself with whipped cream? Casually suggesting sex at a weird moment? Not so much.  I don't think Nick will have any issue distinguishing between what's good timing or not.  I think he finds her attractive and appreciates her boldness at least so far, but obviously does not find her irresistable.


I think there are several differences for me. The first is that the other topless woman was asked to be that way from the start and her goodies were strategically covered so nothing showed. Almost like a one piece. She also didn't throw it in the others faces. Corinne wasn't asked. In fact, the only reason she took her top off was because she was jealous that she might be upstaged. Second, she not only took everything off, she deliberately flashed everyone, shoved herself against Nick and then put his hands on her boobs. Yes, you see this in ads and ANTM, but this isn't that and nobody asked her to do that.

Personally, I didn't think she had the best energy. I thought Alexis and Vanessa had just as good energy, without making anyone else feel uncomfortable and bringing down the energy of the whole thing. Naturally, we weren't shown as much time with them because they weren't naked.

I also don't think the photographer picked Corinne. I strongly suspect it was the producers since she was outrageous and ticked off the other women and caused unnecessary drama. The rest of her shtick is the same....drunk nudged by producers to create more drama and get her azz to BIP. Not really funny or amusing or all in good fun. More like tacky and boring....and that is not because I am offended by nudity...just not a fan of anything forced.

I agree Sprite ....Corinne going topless, plus her actions, made her raunchy and sleezy.....shes in a league of her own....cant compare that to the Eve look which was way more classy.


The (FRC) Proposal..."Will you marry me because I'd really like to date you"
northernviewer
northernviewer

Female Posts : 5387
Join date : 2011-03-23

Back to top Go down

Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers* - Page 12 Empty Re: Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers*

Post by Pandora Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:51 pm

I do think Alexis also had good energy, but it was "funny" rather than sexual. I am not going to say that sexual energy is best for everything, but compared to some of the girls who seemed embarassed to touch Nick or pose with him, Corinne was an improvement.

I am not sure I could call the Eve look "classy," especially on a show like this, but I do remember being disappointed by Brittany's lack of confidence.  (I had to look up her name, if that tells you how boring her part was.)  Thankfully, she wasn't traumatized or crying, but it seemed really apparent that she wanted to hurry up and get it over with. What is the point of that?

I am not suggesting Corinne's strategy is good. She will make herself look increasingly absurd, as her behavior is based on really strange ideas about sexuality, but in that moment what she did seemed fine to me. I guess I am defending her somewhat and in doing that defending Nick.  I don't think his keeping her around is producer-driven entirely at this point and I think he had at least some interest in her or chemistry.  I also want to note that I think his explanation for keeping her around to stir the pot and see how the other women would react sounds like it could be partially true but I suspect it is also part back-pedaling due to backlash.

Either way, I think it is obvious there can be no relationship between Nick and Corinne, but he does not seem to have a relationship with anyone yet anyway.
Pandora
Pandora

Posts : 31
Join date : 2015-01-07

Back to top Go down

Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers* - Page 12 Empty Re: Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers*

Post by Maddy Mon Jan 16, 2017 4:32 pm

Mike Fleiss ‏@fleissmeister

Tonite's official #TheBachelor viewing party will be held in Boulder, Colorado!!! This episode is so hot it will melt the show...
Maddy
Maddy

Posts : 12330
Join date : 2014-01-19

Back to top Go down

Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers* - Page 12 Empty Re: Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers*

Post by Maddy Mon Jan 16, 2017 4:45 pm

Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers* - Page 12 C2QQJSKUQAAL2ev
Raven ‏@ravengates09
On #thebachelor you can show tits, but you can't say tits.
Maddy
Maddy

Posts : 12330
Join date : 2014-01-19

Back to top Go down

Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers* - Page 12 Empty Re: Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers*

Post by atem Mon Jan 16, 2017 5:58 pm

Pandora wrote:I do think Alexis also had good energy, but it was "funny" rather than sexual. I am not going to say that sexual energy is best for everything, but compared to some of the girls who seemed embarassed to touch Nick or pose with him, Corinne was an improvement.

I am not sure I could call the Eve look "classy," especially on a show like this, but I do remember being disappointed by Brittany's lack of confidence.  (I had to look up her name, if that tells you how boring her part was.)  Thankfully, she wasn't traumatized or crying, but it seemed really apparent that she wanted to hurry up and get it over with. What is the point of that?

I am not suggesting Corinne's strategy is good. She will make herself look increasingly absurd, as her behavior is based on really strange ideas about sexuality, but in that moment what she did seemed fine to me. I guess I am defending her somewhat and in doing that defending Nick.  I don't think his keeping her around is producer-driven entirely at this point and I think he had at least some interest in her or chemistry.  I also want to note that I think his explanation for keeping her around to stir the pot and see how the other women would react sounds like it could be partially true but I suspect it is also part back-pedaling due to backlash.

Either way, I think it is obvious there can be no relationship between Nick and Corinne, but he does not seem to have a relationship with anyone yet anyway.

See, that's what I don't get. There's no way Nick would know their reactions until after filming is done and shown on TV. So, him saying he gets to see how they react behind his back makes zero sense to me. The producers purposely don't let the women talk to Nick after the rose is given out until perhaps the pre-rose ceremony.

Corrine bores me. I don't find anything interesting about her, so for the show and Nick to act like there is just annoys me at this point.



Anything I post means it's Just My Opinion.  Don't feel like posting it every time I post. So, I thought I'd get that out of the way.

#Teamatem
atem
atem

Posts : 24759
Join date : 2011-07-26

Back to top Go down

Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers* - Page 12 Empty Re: Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers*

Post by AllAboutLove Mon Jan 16, 2017 6:12 pm

mindless wrote:After watching that preview, I think the whole whipped cream thing is even less of a deal that the boob holding. The cream is barely on her breast, more like décolletage. This is the Bachelor we're talking, where polygamy is the norm, making out on camera is a must and half naked photoshoots are an annual event. Licking a bit of cream off someone's skin is frankly whatever to me. I'm not sure how people are expecting Nick to react, considering he's hardly a prude or above sexual behaviour on camera. I don't think he's ever had a woman go after him quite this aggressively and he probably doesn't even know how to best handle it, so he's just being nice and going along with her requests until she sneaks into his room and tries to have sex with him, which is where he draws the line and refuses. I must just be really jaded, since I don't see anything scandalous about his actions so far. I would be more surprised if he made a big deal of something so tame (IMO) and told her to go put her clothes on. I just can't picture Nick doing that. JMO.  
mindless wrote:snipped

I guess I just don't take this show very seriously, at least anymore. Even going on this show is beyond my comprehension, so I can't really use the same standards for these people than I do for myself, that's just setting myself up for disappointment. Nick's not the one initiating these tacky incidents, Corinne (and the producers) are. Nick's just reacting to them in the way he sees fit in that moment in time and I just see him as being nice. If she's already topless or covered in whipped cream, Nick refusing to touch her will just make her seem even more pathetic. Not saying Nick got no pleasure out of those incidents, I'm not in his head, so I wouldn't know, but he didn't initiate them. That's why I don't consider those actions sleazy so to speak. JMO.

Good Post I agree Maybe I am just used to this show since I don't take any of the villain/drama/scripted stuff seriously and I honestly didn't blink an eye and like you was like "whatever". Nick never initiated any of it and any comparisons to Ben F or Bob IMO I can't even understand. Those guys were like octopuses and initiating the leering and stuff. Nick on the other hand looks like he is very uncomfortable and it is the women, especially Corinne, who are super aggressive towards to Nick. Add in that Nick is the guy who got tons of backlash regarding Andi AFTR, there is no way IMO that if Nick even said anything to Corinne or rebuffed her that it would not be taken even worse, IMO. He is doomed if he does and doomed if he doesn't...so me Nick just let the girls be themselves and they're MOT anyway from what's been sleuthed so I don't see the big deal at all especially since only 2 episodes have been done. I am looking forward to the next episode!  :yes:

AllAboutLove
AllAboutLove

Posts : 30010
Join date : 2014-09-26

Back to top Go down

Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers* - Page 12 Empty Re: Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers*

Post by atem Mon Jan 16, 2017 6:22 pm

Maddy wrote:Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers* - Page 12 C2QQJSKUQAAL2ev
Raven ‏@ravengates09  
On #thebachelor you can show tits, but you can't say tits.

Stop giving them ideas Raven! giggling


Anything I post means it's Just My Opinion.  Don't feel like posting it every time I post. So, I thought I'd get that out of the way.

#Teamatem
atem
atem

Posts : 24759
Join date : 2011-07-26

Back to top Go down

Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers* - Page 12 Empty Re: Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers*

Post by mprssdbyu Mon Jan 16, 2017 6:34 pm

atem wrote:
Pandora wrote:I do think Alexis also had good energy, but it was "funny" rather than sexual. I am not going to say that sexual energy is best for everything, but compared to some of the girls who seemed embarassed to touch Nick or pose with him, Corinne was an improvement.

I am not sure I could call the Eve look "classy," especially on a show like this, but I do remember being disappointed by Brittany's lack of confidence.  (I had to look up her name, if that tells you how boring her part was.)  Thankfully, she wasn't traumatized or crying, but it seemed really apparent that she wanted to hurry up and get it over with. What is the point of that?

I am not suggesting Corinne's strategy is good. She will make herself look increasingly absurd, as her behavior is based on really strange ideas about sexuality, but in that moment what she did seemed fine to me. I guess I am defending her somewhat and in doing that defending Nick.  I don't think his keeping her around is producer-driven entirely at this point and I think he had at least some interest in her or chemistry.  I also want to note that I think his explanation for keeping her around to stir the pot and see how the other women would react sounds like it could be partially true but I suspect it is also part back-pedaling due to backlash.

Either way, I think it is obvious there can be no relationship between Nick and Corinne, but he does not seem to have a relationship with anyone yet anyway.

See, that's what I don't get.  There's no way Nick would know their reactions until after filming is done and shown on TV. So, him saying he gets to see how they react behind his back makes zero sense to me. The producers purposely don't let the women talk to Nick after the rose is given out until perhaps the pre-rose ceremony.

Corrine bores me.  I don't find anything interesting about her, so for the show and Nick to act like there is just annoys me at this point.  

Unfortunately, we haven't been shown 95% of the conversations with the other girls. IMO, there's no way Vanessa shows up with that greeting on her 1-1 if they haven't been connecting at some point. If that applies with her, I'm sure Nick is spending quality time we don't see with all others(as much as time will allow).  With that in mind, I can see Nick testing the waters in how they handle things that don't go their way. if Nick was taken back at Corrine's actions, (IMO) there's no way he didn't know the girls weren't pondering their own emotional reactions. It may not be the way other leads would have handled it or I would have handled it, but I can see his curiosity getting the best of him. That and a very big push from TPTB.


Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass
It's about learning to dance in the rain
mprssdbyu
mprssdbyu

Posts : 3816
Join date : 2011-03-23

Back to top Go down

Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers* - Page 12 Empty Re: Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers*

Post by atem Mon Jan 16, 2017 7:00 pm

So, will there be another 'to be continued' since they did it already? I haven't watched other seasons to see how it affected the other episodes.

So that means the whipped cream part happens at the beginning of the episode?

I also don't think Corrine misses the Rose Ceremony. It seems she does take a nap when the cocktail party is going on and Jasmine is asking where she is.


Anything I post means it's Just My Opinion.  Don't feel like posting it every time I post. So, I thought I'd get that out of the way.

#Teamatem
atem
atem

Posts : 24759
Join date : 2011-07-26

Back to top Go down

Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers* - Page 12 Empty Re: Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers*

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 12 of 48 Previous  1 ... 7 ... 11, 12, 13 ... 30 ... 48  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

Nick Viall - Bachelor 21 - Episode 3 Jan 16th - *Sleuthing Spoilers*

+63
Brill
emiusacska
Duke702
lightredemption
SueSt
SeekAny
quietpal
traveler90
ReneeM
Seabear
Cocoasneeze
luvstx
happygolucky
LeapofFaith
jen689
california90
Rolly
nutty1
BachIsMyGuiltyPleasure
KB_Mom
LoveDovez
Ash2214
puppiesandkittens
pbmax
cookielover12
Crazylady29
Diana
BlackHalo
umngirl
sparkler
Kels0012
mizzoufan
AllAboutLove
northernviewer
Pandora
ElonM
whit90
coolangel
officeRules
sbolduc
Maddy
Nibbles22
allykat
crunchycheeto
Sprite
notarose
Stacia620
sdmom
Cila51290
Kashathediva
atem
MonicaJM2001
OnePromise
mindless
emusha
hae1001
mprssdbyu
Catdwoman50
lleyki
Lisa
hdman
Ladybug82
GuardianAngel
67 posters
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum