The Bachelorette 11 - Kaitlyn Bristowe - #5 - Media - Tweets - IG - *Sleuthing - Spoilers* - Discussion

AllAboutLove wrote:IA with SueSt:
- Kaitlyn has to defend her choice of letting Nick return, regardless of the outcome.
- If there is no F1, she has to defend that too (without directly saying so).

In People Magazine:
Kaitlyn talks about making a mistake (pre-FS-sex) and regrets the timing.
....makes me think she is defending her choice of this more than who she slept with.

"This is who I am, and if you're going to love me for the rest of my life, then you have to love me for who I am".
....I find K's words about someone needing to love her for who she is (mistakes and all) only likely to make sense in relation to the other F2, Shawn if Nick is sex-guy and Shawn not accepting this enough to propose.

Kaitlyn on the outcome: "I just have to move forward and be thankful for what I went through" (seems to point to no F1?)
....If there is no F1, it's likely the show will make it appear like it's 100% K's choice to reject both F2 (whether true or not)...

emusha wrote:what about the part where she said Nick def came on the show with the right intentions? with strong feelings? for her? she said all those things in an E! interview

In general I agree that she has to cover her back. 100%

but this goes a step beyond that very obviously...my confusion is that the tptb leak magazine is covering Nick's back -- since when?? Didn't they thrive off of his villain edit -- are they actually justifying it in the mag?? plus why would they cover K's back when they've thrown leads under the bus over and over e.g. Ben F, JPG etc.

Alanna wrote:

emusha wrote:what about the part where she said Nick def came on the show with the right intentions? with strong feelings? for her? she said all those things in an E! interview

In general I agree that she has to cover her back. 100%

but this goes a step beyond that very obviously...my confusion is that the tptb leak magazine is covering Nick's back -- since when?? Didn't they thrive off of his villain edit -- are they actually justifying it in the mag?? plus why would they cover K's back when they've thrown leads under the bus over and over e.g. Ben F, JPG etc.

Well they're already playing evilllllll music over there kissing so I don't think they're justifying anything. We'll see what it all looks like when he actually comes on.

emusha wrote:what about the part where she said Nick def came on the show with the right intentions? with strong feelings? for her? she said all those things in an E! interview

In general I agree that she has to cover her back. 100%

but this goes a step beyond that very obviously...my confusion is that the tptb leak magazine is covering Nick's back -- since when?? Didn't they thrive off of his villain edit -- are they actually justifying it in the mag?? plus why would they cover K's back when they've thrown leads under the bus over and over e.g. Ben F, JPG etc.

emusha wrote:well here's what i'm thinking if production wasn't happy with these two people they have SOOOO much material -- imagine reading this article pulling out every bit that could be fodder for scandalous revelations to completely humiliate them --- from them having a "relationship" prior to the show (whattt  )  to "her missing him" and being emotionally unavailable to the other guys while on the show (whattt  )  to "explicit messages" (whattt  ) to angering innocent guys who gave up their whole lives to come on this show (whattt  )  

there's wayy too much material for this to be a trashy tabloid article and the fact that they didn't use it as that is veryyyy confusing to me right now