Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
bachandbachettefans.net :: Completed Shows - Archived - Other Locked or Inactive Forums :: Bachelorette USA - Archived :: Bachelorette USA - Archived :: Bachelorette 10 - Andi Dorfman - Archived :: Bachelorette 10 - Andi Dorfman - Contestants - Archived :: Andi Dorfman Bachelorette 10 - Nick Viall
Page 28 of 80 • Share
Page 28 of 80 • 1 ... 15 ... 27, 28, 29 ... 54 ... 80
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
FLChica wrote:
...just as one man's leftovers are another man's feast.
I honestly don't blame Josh for being bitter and angry. Heck, he didn't have a serious relationship for five years. Now the world knows his fiance slept with the other guy before him - a few days before he proposes with a big old ABC paid for Neil Lane ring that she designed. Poor fella.
Keep on living your life Nick.
So true, so true.
MVMom39forever- Posts : 2975
Join date : 2012-10-01
Location : Pemberley estate
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
I totally disagree. If Andi had not slept with Nick there would be nothing for him to disclose. Period. He ASKED a question in response to her statement about not having feelings for him. All of this would have been avoided if Andi had acknowledged that she did have feelings for Nick. Then he would not have questioned why she slept with him. There's an old saying: "Be careful what you do in the dark for it will come to light." jmokdubs_ca wrote:sdmom wrote:Media ask questions and he answers. I am curios what people think how he should have answered. I really mean it.
He should say "I was hurt that night (ATFR) and I was indiscreet. My apologies to Andi and Josh for revealing more than I should. I received the closure I needed now and I'm ready to move on."
What grosses me out is the continual talk about the act itself. Plus, I hate the political answer, "I'm sorry if you were offended / hurt / humiliated." Just say you were sorry for saying too much.
Realistically, no one's mind is going to be changed here. I think the continued media junket is just reinforcing everyone's opinion of Nick as saint or cad. The truth will out about all three of them, and some of us will be saying (or thinking at least) I told you so, and others will be wondering how they misjudged so badly. For all I know, all three of them are jerks!
Last edited by 2observe on Fri Aug 01, 2014 1:06 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : change the word "by" to "why")
2observe- Posts : 3307
Join date : 2011-07-20
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
MVMom39forever wrote:FLChica wrote:
...just as one man's leftovers are another man's feast.
I honestly don't blame Josh for being bitter and angry. Heck, he didn't have a serious relationship for five years. Now the world knows his fiance slept with the other guy before him - a few days before he proposes with a big old ABC paid for Neil Lane ring that she designed. Poor fella.
Keep on living your life Nick.
So true, so true.
Yep, I actually feel sorry for Josh in all this. It makes him look like a fool. The best ending would have been if he came out on ATFR and dumped her a$$ over it.
Guest- Guest
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
This is more than sort of snarky but what the heck ...
I don't know where all this talk comes from about how great Nick's job is. At 33 to be a Salesforce.com salesman is fine, but seriously, by that age, one should be way up the ladder by region or industry sector. I am a career snob, I freely admit (Ed S actually had a great job in software sales at MSN). Andi's legal credentials underwhelm. Etc. So take my comment with that grain of salt. Nick is employed at a good company, but he is a run of the mill account exec soliciting small to medium business accounts at age 33. Ho hum. Hyperbole abounds on the board. He has a steady job.
And Josh is two years into building a book of business as a financial advisor, and was a strong student at UGA. It's an exhausting profession in terms of needing to build a roster of clients ... but being a Murray in Georgia must be a good door opener. (Being the guy who "won" the Bachelorette? Not so much ... doesn't connect to the person to whom you'd entrust your nest egg, college funds, etc. ... but doubt it hurts either).
They are all about the same age, at about the same place in their careers. Successful, but let's not get carried away. It's not like they are Pantsapreneurs or something.
I don't know where all this talk comes from about how great Nick's job is. At 33 to be a Salesforce.com salesman is fine, but seriously, by that age, one should be way up the ladder by region or industry sector. I am a career snob, I freely admit (Ed S actually had a great job in software sales at MSN). Andi's legal credentials underwhelm. Etc. So take my comment with that grain of salt. Nick is employed at a good company, but he is a run of the mill account exec soliciting small to medium business accounts at age 33. Ho hum. Hyperbole abounds on the board. He has a steady job.
And Josh is two years into building a book of business as a financial advisor, and was a strong student at UGA. It's an exhausting profession in terms of needing to build a roster of clients ... but being a Murray in Georgia must be a good door opener. (Being the guy who "won" the Bachelorette? Not so much ... doesn't connect to the person to whom you'd entrust your nest egg, college funds, etc. ... but doubt it hurts either).
They are all about the same age, at about the same place in their careers. Successful, but let's not get carried away. It's not like they are Pantsapreneurs or something.
jlccaz- Posts : 2135
Join date : 2011-03-23
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
grace8136 wrote:MVMom39forever wrote:FLChica wrote:
...just as one man's leftovers are another man's feast.
I honestly don't blame Josh for being bitter and angry. Heck, he didn't have a serious relationship for five years. Now the world knows his fiance slept with the other guy before him - a few days before he proposes with a big old ABC paid for Neil Lane ring that she designed. Poor fella.
Keep on living your life Nick.
So true, so true.
Yep, I actually feel sorry for Josh in all this. It makes him look like a fool. The best ending would have been if he came out on ATFR and dumped her a$$ over it.
Could you just imagine that ending....!!! That would have been dynamite! I guess that would have thought Andi not to play with Nick's emotions and feelings by sleeping with him when she knew she didn't love him more than Josh. Nick wasn't expecting to sleep with her because before they went into the FS he specifically told her he was looking forward to talking to her all night. But she was selfish and went ahead and slept with him not thinking about the repercussions to her actions. Fortunately enough, Nick was the wrong F2 to mess around with because he didn't see what they did as casual and I applaud him for that.
unknown82- Posts : 402
Join date : 2011-07-01
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
jlccaz wrote: They are all about the same age, at about the same place in their careers. Successful, but let's not get carried away. It's not like they are Pantsapreneurs or something.
Oh good lord... the freakin' pantsapreneur who ironically might be the most successful of all. I work at Stanford and he has a bit of a name for himself at the Graduate School of Business. Start up company, good at social media, contacts at Stanford, in Silicon Valley? If Andi factored earning potential into her find a mate calculation, JJ must have been SERIOUSLY deficient in other areas to not make it farther.
And, yeah, out here, the Salesforce.com sales person is code for couldn't get a job at Google, Apple, or Facebook. They are headquartered in the city, which is nice though.
kdubs_ca- Posts : 463
Join date : 2011-07-01
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
FLChica wrote:mercieme wrote:isittrue wrote:
Well, the handsome prince in this case apparently has some bittercakes too... Instead of taking the high road, he has managed to bash Nick as classless every chance he gets. I don't see where Nick (who is not a frog IMO) is bitter. He has addressed the elephant in the room due to media demand and congratulated Andi and Josh on their engagement. Not sure how much more he is expected to do.
LOL....and the bitter frog will be someone's prince someday. Life really is beautiful, one's man's meat is another man's poison like they say in my part of the world so it's all good for Nick IMO
...just as one man's leftovers are another man's feast.
I honestly don't blame Josh for being bitter and angry. Heck, he didn't have a serious relationship for five years. Now the world knows his fiance slept with the other guy before him - a few days before he proposes with a big old ABC paid for Neil Lane ring that she designed. Poor fella.
Keep on living your life Nick.
Yes I do feel a bit sorry for Josh but he can always disengaged himself from her. I will never understand her thinking that sleeping with both guys was okay especiallly if she already knew she was in love with Josh.
Pia1- Posts : 2104
Join date : 2013-03-08
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
kdubs_ca wrote:jlccaz wrote: They are all about the same age, at about the same place in their careers. Successful, but let's not get carried away. It's not like they are Pantsapreneurs or something.
Oh good lord... the freakin' pantsapreneur who ironically might be the most successful of all. I work at Stanford and he has a bit of a name for himself at the Graduate School of Business. Start up company, good at social media, contacts at Stanford, in Silicon Valley? If Andi factored earning potential into her find a mate calculation, JJ must have been SERIOUSLY deficient in other areas to not make it farther.
And, yeah, out here, the Salesforce.com sales person is code for couldn't get a job at Google, Apple, or Facebook. They are headquartered in the city, which is nice though.
With so many people with degrees and Master's degrees unemployed these days, I'm just thankful that at least they're gainfully employed.
Pia1- Posts : 2104
Join date : 2013-03-08
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
I liked Sharleen's recap. Here is the comment I posted.
I believe Andi put her self in the position to be asked the very question she claims was "below the belt." She told us at the beginning of the season how tough she is (cue SWAT team footage) and how being a ADA made her ready to deal with conflict and anything that might be thrown at her. Then, what did she do? Avoid conflict by not meeting with Nick either of the two times we know about when she was contacted by Bachelorette staff telling her he wanted to speak to her. And, it came back to bite her in the butt as avoidance behavior almost always does.
Two things could have happened. 1. She could not have had sex with Nick since she clearly was not choosing him based on her exclamations of how she knew it was Josh from the very beginning. 2. She could have talked to him - even by phone and the question would have most likely not been blurted out on national TV.
As a grown woman she must know by now that a a very basic tenet of life is don't do something that you are going to be emabarrassed to talk about later - especially if you are on national TV.
I believe Andi put her self in the position to be asked the very question she claims was "below the belt." She told us at the beginning of the season how tough she is (cue SWAT team footage) and how being a ADA made her ready to deal with conflict and anything that might be thrown at her. Then, what did she do? Avoid conflict by not meeting with Nick either of the two times we know about when she was contacted by Bachelorette staff telling her he wanted to speak to her. And, it came back to bite her in the butt as avoidance behavior almost always does.
Two things could have happened. 1. She could not have had sex with Nick since she clearly was not choosing him based on her exclamations of how she knew it was Josh from the very beginning. 2. She could have talked to him - even by phone and the question would have most likely not been blurted out on national TV.
As a grown woman she must know by now that a a very basic tenet of life is don't do something that you are going to be emabarrassed to talk about later - especially if you are on national TV.
sissyintexas- Posts : 36
Join date : 2011-06-29
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
I moved these posts because my reply is about Nick.
The bolded was exactly a tweet by Jennifer Weiner. Lucas posted her recap yesterday. I stumbled upon these "famous" writers live tweeting together during the Finale. Ironically, I discovered them through Millsy. He had retweeted their tweets and once again I followed the Holy Twitter Grail.
They were all unanimous in their thinking that Nick did not "accidentally" slip out the ""making love" comment as he is claiming in his media rounds but instead these group of writers agreed it was "slut shaming". It took me long to find out on google what one meant that Nick peed a circle around Andi. When I traced their convo, as per your bolded, Nick "marked" his territory that he "has been there and done that" for the whole world to see. That he was first to Andi and Josh is having Andi as Nick's sloppy seconds. I'm still on the fence whether Nick said those infamous words out of surprise stemming from Andi's "cold" demeanor. But a large part of me remembers Nick's tweet about Tears for Fears' Shout. Dint Nick's supporters gleefully consider that tweet as a "Shout" to Andi? In the unspoiled group I said once Nick tweeted it, I felt it was a bitter "Shout" out to Andi. "Shout, Shout.... I'm talking to YOU! come on! ... If I COULD CHANGE your mind, I'd really like to BREAK YOUR HEART!" The timing of that tweet was the Wednesday after the MTN taping. This tweet somehow supports my feeling that his "slip out" was not an accident but an intention to break her heart by slut shaming her, rain on her parade. My opinion, of course.
In the other thread is a great discussion started by jlccaz about Nick as a possible Bachelor. If not for Arie, I want Nick to be the Next Bachelor. So he too can understand how difficult it is to be the lead. Just like Andi taking responsibility and finally realizing her "fault" Juan Pab's season.
Below are the SCs of the live tweets of the group of writers.
unknown82 wrote:ironcat wrote:FLChica wrote:I do feel very sorry for Josh in all of this. After months of wearing wigs and baseball caps to hook up with his Pookie while Mama Murray prepared the ultimate viewing party for friends and family, the whole world is treated to the news that his "baby" was naughty with Nick. How emasculating that must be! Folks may like to think of Josh as the dawg on top, but he wasn't the only puppy playing on Pookie's porch.
I strongly suspect that Andi has attempted to turn lemons into lemonade on this one, and has told Joshie that Nick was a real dud in the sack and that he is THE MAN.
Hey at least Nick can say he has been there and done that before Josh when it comes to Andi .... Josh on the other hand well..... Nick is in a better position and he doesn't have to deal with the extra baggage.:cutesmile!:
The bolded was exactly a tweet by Jennifer Weiner. Lucas posted her recap yesterday. I stumbled upon these "famous" writers live tweeting together during the Finale. Ironically, I discovered them through Millsy. He had retweeted their tweets and once again I followed the Holy Twitter Grail.
They were all unanimous in their thinking that Nick did not "accidentally" slip out the ""making love" comment as he is claiming in his media rounds but instead these group of writers agreed it was "slut shaming". It took me long to find out on google what one meant that Nick peed a circle around Andi. When I traced their convo, as per your bolded, Nick "marked" his territory that he "has been there and done that" for the whole world to see. That he was first to Andi and Josh is having Andi as Nick's sloppy seconds. I'm still on the fence whether Nick said those infamous words out of surprise stemming from Andi's "cold" demeanor. But a large part of me remembers Nick's tweet about Tears for Fears' Shout. Dint Nick's supporters gleefully consider that tweet as a "Shout" to Andi? In the unspoiled group I said once Nick tweeted it, I felt it was a bitter "Shout" out to Andi. "Shout, Shout.... I'm talking to YOU! come on! ... If I COULD CHANGE your mind, I'd really like to BREAK YOUR HEART!" The timing of that tweet was the Wednesday after the MTN taping. This tweet somehow supports my feeling that his "slip out" was not an accident but an intention to break her heart by slut shaming her, rain on her parade. My opinion, of course.
In the other thread is a great discussion started by jlccaz about Nick as a possible Bachelor. If not for Arie, I want Nick to be the Next Bachelor. So he too can understand how difficult it is to be the lead. Just like Andi taking responsibility and finally realizing her "fault" Juan Pab's season.
Below are the SCs of the live tweets of the group of writers.
- click here to read Jennifer Weiner's article:
- Lucas15 wrote:I posted this article in the Media thread but am repeating it here to make a few comments on it and this season (WARNING - probable long post coming).The rap on this season’s “Bachelorette,” starring Atlanta lawyer Andi Dorfman, was that it just wasn’t very interesting. Andi, who famously rejected narcissistic Juan Pablo on “The Bachelor,” was initially a fan favorite, but perhaps because she’s just so darn well-adjusted, her show lacked much of the drama that has characterized past outings. Level-headed, articulate, self-sufficient and self-aware, Andi’s not a clinger, a weeper, or an emotional train wreck.
Andi Dorfman's "Bachelorette" season was pretty straightforward -- until runner-up Nick Viall decided to get personal on Monday night's show.
Alas, it was the case of a good person making for terrible TV. The season finale was the lowest-rated in the franchise’s history, perhaps because the ending was such a foregone conclusion.
Boredom reigned until Monday night, when the “After the Final Rose” show threw a bunch of double standards about sex and gender into sharp relief, turning “The Bachelorette” from “wake me up when it’s over” to Must See TV.
For those unfamiliar with “The Bachelorette,” the franchise runs on a highly ritualized process, where a young, conventionally attractive man or woman goes on a series of producer-orchestrated dates with a pool of eligible singles, eliminating some each week at cheesy rose ceremonies. The goal? To have the last man down on bended knee with a network-provided Neil Lane ring in his hand (even on “The Bachelorette,” where the woman does the picking, it’s the man who does the proposing).
“The Bachelor/ette” tells us it’s about finding love, but one of the things it’s really about is reinforcing some fairly old-school notions about how men and women are.
For women, the show instructs, there is nothing more meaningful than love or marriage. Career? Friends? Family? None of it means anything, and at least once per episode our heroine will be required to give voice to her loneliness, her emptiness, her desperation to have someone put a ring on it.
Women are passive; men are active. Women are emotional, men are rational. Women see sex as a means to the ultimate end – that Neil Lane sparkler, and what happens when the cameras aren’t watching stays, for the most part, under wraps.
That rule got broken on Monday, when runner-up Nick Viall demanded, on live TV, to know why, if she wasn’t in love with him, she’d made love with him, and also done other, unspecified, “fiancé-type stuff.”
Cue 100,000 dropped jaws, tweets of 'He said WHAT?!?,' and many, many jokes about precisely what constituted “fiancé-type stuff.” (Clearly: emptying the dishwasher!)
It was shocking, cringe-inducing TV, kissing-and-telling gone nuclear.
Here’s the thing: there may be, as Chris Rock once instructed, no sex in the Champagne Room, but there assuredly IS sex in the Fantasy Suite, where the Bachelor or Bachelorette is permitted — nay, encouraged — to entertain his or her final three choices all night long, away from the cameras. In 2014, where the median age of first sex is somewhere around 17, and where between 75 and 80 percent of Americans have had intercourse before the age of 19, it’s ridiculous to imagine that a 27-year-old woman would agree to marry a 33-year-old man without sampling the merchandise/kicking the tires/making sure she is sexually compatible with the person she might wed.
So, yes, Nick, we know you did it. But, clearly, knowing that we know wasn’t enough. Nick wanted to plant his flag (and, maybe, to let victor Josh Murray know that Andi may not have chosen Nick, but that he got there first). It was churlish and ungentlemanly at best, slut-shaming and sloppy-seconding at worst, a way of slapping a scarlet 'S' on a woman’s chest with the whole world — including her newly announced fiancé and, presumably, her parents — looking on.
Andi handled the situation with her typical class and restraint. She told Nick he was “hitting below the belt.” She reiterated that she wasn’t faking anything, but her feelings were simply stronger for Josh. She sounded … a lot like a guy would sound in a similar situation, if he was forced to confront a teary woman he’d slept with, then dumped, after deciding he just wasn’t that into her.
Imagine a world where Andi could have coolly said, ‘Of course I slept with you! Before I let you propose, I had to know whether you were any good at it!” (Beat). “By the way, you’re not.”
We aren’t there yet…but it sure looks like that’s where we’re going. Hookup culture is a thing, and some — many — young woman are joyful, unconflicted participants in the booty-call economy. Yes, a part of me wishes that sex was special and rare and meaningful, even on a cheesy ratings-driven reality show where “winning” is less about a marriage and more about a future stint on “Dancing With the Stars.”
But I don’t have any right to tell Andi Dorfman how to live her life, or handle her sex life. If equality means that a young woman can choose to enjoy casual, unencumbered sex, just the way men have been doing forever, I’m not going to judge. And if Nick truly cared for Andi, he should have manned up, swallowed his sore-loser hurt feelings, and refused to expose her to the world’s judgment.
Jennifer Weiner is the bestselling author of 11 books. Her latest, "All Fall Down," was published June 17.
Regarding the highlighted observation:
Not at all to demean the Herculean efforts here to figure out the season ending without benefit of spoilers (go TeamEinstein), once Andi proclaimed on Episode 1 "Exactly my type. Nailed it. Damn!" the only real question could have been "Will Josh turn into Brooks Part 2 and Andi's season end like Des's? Unlike us viewers, TPTB knew the answer to that before we figured it out. They knew that Josh was not bitten by the same "bug" that makes pro athletes weak husband material ("Why should I settle down with this one when there may be someone better in the groupies in the next city we play a game in?") They also knew Josh knew of, yea had even SEEN Andi in person, and was already very attracted to her before filming started. So this was no "Des Part 2" season and they had a real problem - how to create drama when the end could be such a foregone conclusion, the result of some good casting "luck of the draw".
The solution - enter Nick Vaill - perhaps the only one who might not reach the same conclusion because of generous helpings of producer manipulation of a personality susceptible to such manipulation, starting with the FIR, minimal group dates but a GD rose, and some help from Andi using the same "fiancé-type stuff" I've heard time and time again, show after show. I don't blame Andi - she did the job that she signed a contract to do as only an attorney could perceive that contract. And the producers got exactly the confrontation they wanted at the ATFR, the result of wisely making sure that Andi never gave Nick a chance to confront her until it was all live in front of millions of viewers.
The pawn in this game of chess was Nick but the chess master was not Andi, it was the show producers and there's a long list of their past "accomplishments" that probably make this season pretty tame in comparison. As for Andi? I don't think she cares; she got exactly what she wanted out of the experience and I wish her only the best. She entered the lion's den and came out with only a few superficial scratches and the guy she wanted - who wants her seemingly as much as she wants him. Love wins this time around.
"This moment in my life
It's like I've never loved before
The way you show me with a kiss
How much you care
You are love
You are life
You are peace of mind.", 'Peace Of Mind', David Cook
#TheOGJash #SeanCat #Jadine #GoldSquad
#TeamMCAUReynold #COOKista
#Tannah4evah #MattyjandLaura #MaRthur #JorJo #Darvey
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
GuardianAngel wrote:Kashathediva wrote:Litta123 wrote:You know, if Nick becomes the next Bachelor, his FS dates will be interesting. Either he has sex with no one...or his F1 will automatically know where she stands. At least, that better be the way it plays out -- or I can only imagine the brouhaha TPTB will produce in his ATFR.
In past seasons, they take the strengths of the prior season and turn them into the lead's weaknesses.
SO I am hoping Nick moves on.
That is exactly what has happened to Andi. Her mouthing off about the lack of interest by JPG in the FS, where she could have won an Oscar, has led her to this nightmare.
Which is exactly why former contestants should stay as far away from this show as possible. The leads are (mostly) well liked at the beginning of the season and then really disliked by many in the general public by the end of the show. Very few leads have come out of the show unscathed.
Sable- Posts : 315
Join date : 2012-03-06
Age : 57
Location : Chicago
Re: Nick Viall - Bachelorette 10 - Discussion - Thread #6
grace8136 wrote:MVMom39forever wrote:FLChica wrote:
...just as one man's leftovers are another man's feast.
I honestly don't blame Josh for being bitter and angry. Heck, he didn't have a serious relationship for five years. Now the world knows his fiance slept with the other guy before him - a few days before he proposes with a big old ABC paid for Neil Lane ring that she designed. Poor fella.
Keep on living your life Nick.
So true, so true.
Yep, I actually feel sorry for Josh in all this. It makes him look like a fool. The best ending would have been if he came out on ATFR and dumped her a$$ over it.
Ummm, and what does that make Nick look like considering he has been pursuing Andi despite Andi being engaged to and practically living with Josh the last 3 months? He has been hoping Andi would change her mind and go back to him so apparently Nick has no pride about getting dumped for another man or reuniting with Josh's fiancé.
These comments about sloppy seconds and feeling sorry for Josh are distasteful to me on so many different levels. No need to feel sorry for Josh...he's got the woman he loves by his side and is as happy as can be. I'm not a fan of Nick's, never was but I do hope he finds peace and the right lady for him in the not too distant future.
Acrunch- Posts : 553
Join date : 2012-07-04
Page 28 of 80 • 1 ... 15 ... 27, 28, 29 ... 54 ... 80
bachandbachettefans.net :: Completed Shows - Archived - Other Locked or Inactive Forums :: Bachelorette USA - Archived :: Bachelorette USA - Archived :: Bachelorette 10 - Andi Dorfman - Archived :: Bachelorette 10 - Andi Dorfman - Contestants - Archived :: Andi Dorfman Bachelorette 10 - Nick Viall
Page 28 of 80
+99
vivi2
StacyNor
Bet2Win
eliza3
philphan
Marybods
Georgia Lindsay
ThankMeLater
beader
Iam4UGA
albean99
Beagle
quietpal
whit90
pavalygurl
alwaystulips
Jolena
Di_ATL
Woodyallen90210
motheroffive
Acrunch
Sable
Cari
sissyintexas
unknown82
jlccaz
Pia1
Luvstruck
emad0722
emeraldluvsbama
George1218
MMA50
lisahelmantoler
richmondrose
aglaea
Amberish
Catdwoman50
2observe
b
rosesrREd
Brill
bleuberry
mercieme
eirekay
Rolly
umngirl
BuckeyeGal06
ironcat
Relalou
BachfanNY
chloep
livlafluv1
gramof6
lavenderred
lovelySC
Admin
FLChica
atem
docnash14
soccermom333
cindebugg
pander3575
Kashathediva
stuckinsc
luvlady345
bilolo
lleyki
Bronwyn
CHO
Luvvy
sdmom
Ash2214
kdubs_ca
Litta123
Tnmomof4
Hotmomma
Alanna
bluwavz
Piper61
MVMom39forever
torybean
DMBFan
Norcalgal
dw_a_mom
SueSt
Cecilia
emusha
sbolduc
MiaHawk
ag54
Lucas15
Mirzam
isittrue
Jeepers
nutty1
Karche
clueless
happygolucky
GuardianAngel
103 posters
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum