Chris Soules - Bachelorette 10 Contestant - Spoilers - Discussion

Beagle wrote:Catherine had her 1 on 1 in ep 6. Impossible for her to get another in epi 7. Chris had his in epi 2. Plenty of time for him to get a second date. I think is telling that the Gondola date in Venice ( it was Chris turn) went to Nick. That should be a pretty romantic date.

Exactly. I don't understand why he wouldn't have another 1-1 when his first one was the second week......

BUT IA that we just need to wait and see. I'm just pointing out how I think it's strange...  

Beagle wrote:Catherine had her 1 on 1 in ep 6. Impossible for her to get another in epi 7. Chris had his in epi 2. Plenty of time for him to get a second date. I think is telling that the Gondola date in Venice ( it was Chris turn) went to Nick. That should be a pretty romantic date.

The point is Beagle, he was on most of the dates. If she needed more time with him, I am sure that could of been arranged. IMO, she knew what he was/is and They had been getting enough time together.

sanlee088 wrote:

Beagle wrote:Catherine had her 1 on 1 in ep 6. Impossible for her to get another in epi 7. Chris had his in epi 2. Plenty of time for him to get a second date. I think is telling that the Gondola date in Venice ( it was Chris turn) went to Nick. That should be a pretty romantic date.

Exactly. I don't understand why he wouldn't have another 1-1 when his first one was the second week......

BUT IA that we just need to wait and see. I'm just pointing out how I think it's strange...  

Maybe Catherine and Chris have more in common here with Andi having an early date with Chris, she got to know all she needed to know and that is why he was on the other dates from then on but no more individual date. Sean him self said that he could of had Catherine on an earlier date but also knew that he wanted her around and knew enough about their connection that he didn't need more than just the one individual date. What if Andi's and Chris's connection is the same?

There seems to be so much Josh love around here that anyone saying anything about the other guys gets met with resistance it seems.

Aunties_Love wrote:

sanlee088 wrote:

Beagle wrote:Catherine had her 1 on 1 in ep 6. Impossible for her to get another in epi 7. Chris had his in epi 2. Plenty of time for him to get a second date. I think is telling that the Gondola date in Venice ( it was Chris turn) went to Nick. That should be a pretty romantic date.

Exactly. I don't understand why he wouldn't have another 1-1 when his first one was the second week......

BUT IA that we just need to wait and see. I'm just pointing out how I think it's strange...  

Maybe Catherine and Chris have more in common here with Andi having an early date with Chris, she got to know all she needed to know and that is why he was on the other dates from then on but no more individual date.  Sean him self said that he could of had Catherine on an earlier date but also knew that he wanted her around and knew enough about their connection that he didn't need more than just the one individual date.  What if Andi's and Chris's connection is the same?

There seems to be so much Josh love around here that anyone saying anything about the other guys gets met with resistance it seems.

I don't think we can really compare the two considering one got a 1-on-1 date in episode 2 and never again, while the other slowly built a relationship with the lead until she got a 1-on-1 episode 6, at which point there was no time for her to have another 1-on-1.

I get that you seem to be a Chris fan/supporter/backer/not team Josh, but the fact he never got another 1-on-1 after he had the second one of the whole season and others got repeats is a little concerning.

sanlee088 wrote:

Beagle wrote:Catherine had her 1 on 1 in ep 6. Impossible for her to get another in epi 7. Chris had his in epi 2. Plenty of time for him to get a second date. I think is telling that the Gondola date in Venice ( it was Chris turn) went to Nick. That should be a pretty romantic date.

Exactly. I don't understand why he wouldn't have another 1-1 when his first one was the second week......

BUT IA that we just need to wait and see. I'm just pointing out how I think it's strange...  

Glad I'm not the only one who finds it strange!  I posted in Nick's thread about this.  I think RS may be missing some info on extra time for Chris because from a production stand point, it just makes no sense for Chris to only get one on one time in week 2 and make it to HTD and likely beyond.  Having only one late date without time to fit in more is very different than a 2nd ep date and then nothing until HTD,  especially if it's accurate that Nick gets one on one time 2 eps in a row.   I'm really thinking Chris must get some time somewhere that RS is missing to keep him in the viewers minds.  Or the producers are just out to lunch, IMO, which is entirely possible. 

umngirl wrote:

Aunties_Love wrote:

sanlee088 wrote:

Beagle wrote:Catherine had her 1 on 1 in ep 6. Impossible for her to get another in epi 7. Chris had his in epi 2. Plenty of time for him to get a second date. I think is telling that the Gondola date in Venice ( it was Chris turn) went to Nick. That should be a pretty romantic date.

Exactly. I don't understand why he wouldn't have another 1-1 when his first one was the second week......

BUT IA that we just need to wait and see. I'm just pointing out how I think it's strange...  

Maybe Catherine and Chris have more in common here with Andi having an early date with Chris, she got to know all she needed to know and that is why he was on the other dates from then on but no more individual date.  Sean him self said that he could of had Catherine on an earlier date but also knew that he wanted her around and knew enough about their connection that he didn't need more than just the one individual date.  What if Andi's and Chris's connection is the same?

There seems to be so much Josh love around here that anyone saying anything about the other guys gets met with resistance it seems.

I don't think we can really compare the two considering one got a 1-on-1 date in episode 2 and never again, while the other slowly built a relationship with the lead until she got a 1-on-1 episode 6, at which point there was no time for her to have another 1-on-1.

I get that you seem to be a Chris fan/supporter/backer/not team Josh, but the fact he never got another 1-on-1 after he had the second one of the whole season and others got repeats is a little concerning.

But if he got the first one, she saw something in him that she liked and through the course of the rest of the dates got to know him and like what she saw, then isn't it possible that they didn't need more time together as she already knew she wanted him to stick around?? IMO, in that way, it is very much like Sean/Catherine

I am not a Chris fan/supporter....just like cheering for the underdog and from what I can see around here, Chris isn't liked much at all. Since the beginning, most had picked Josh as being F1 cause he's perfect on paper, me I am having my doubts. I am also saying that we are only going on what RS said. Obviously he has the JJ one confused or something's wrong there, so whose to say what else could be wrong too.

sanlee088 wrote:

Beagle wrote:Catherine had her 1 on 1 in ep 6. Impossible for her to get another in epi 7. Chris had his in epi 2. Plenty of time for him to get a second date. I think is telling that the Gondola date in Venice ( it was Chris turn) went to Nick. That should be a pretty romantic date.

Exactly. I don't understand why he wouldn't have another 1-1 when his first one was the second week......

BUT IA that we just need to wait and see. I'm just pointing out how I think it's strange...  

...and how stranger still would it be if after getting one date, at the beginning of the season, he ends up being the F1. That would be nothing comparable to the Sean/Catherine situation.

Aunties_Love wrote:

There seems to be so much Josh love around here that anyone saying anything about the other guys gets met with resistance it seems.

I honestly like what I see of Chris and I am not on any bandwagon. With that said, I still find it very odd that he did not get another 1-1. (Assuming RS is correct with his info.) I don't really agree that if she liked him a lot on the first date that she did not need another one with him. 1-1 dates are totally better time spent together than group dates. The norm usually is that the person who gets a date in episode 2 (if they are still there at the time) should get the first of the second set of 1-1's. Nick, Marcus, and Josh all had a second 1-1 after their first and their first dates were after Chris's first 1-1. It is just strange to me. I am not at all saying that Chris cannot be F1 because he totally could! I guess we just need to wait and see. Just some thoughts. Nothing is 100% until we see it with our own eyes.  :cutesmile!: 

I think the info must be wrong, why/how could Nick get two 1:1s in a row? I guess maybe Nick is the F1 and Andi threw a fit that he needed the second 1:1 in a row or something otherwise it really makes no sense.

sanlee088 wrote:

Aunties_Love wrote:

There seems to be so much Josh love around here that anyone saying anything about the other guys gets met with resistance it seems.

I honestly like what I see of Chris and I am not on any bandwagon. With that said, I still find it very odd that he did not get another 1-1. (Assuming RS is correct with his info.) I don't really agree that if she liked him a lot on the first date that she did not need another one with him. 1-1 dates are totally better time spent together than group dates. The norm usually is that the person who gets a date in episode 2 (if they are still there at the time) should get the first of the second set of 1-1's. Nick, Marcus, and Josh all had a second 1-1 after their first and their first dates were after Chris's first 1-1. It is just strange to me. I am not at all saying that Chris cannot be F1 because he totally could! I guess we just need to wait and see. Just some thoughts. Nothing is 100% until we see it with our own eyes.  :cutesmile!: 

He is looking pretty sexy and funny on the previews. ........Next Bachelor material.

sanlee088 wrote:

Aunties_Love wrote:

There seems to be so much Josh love around here that anyone saying anything about the other guys gets met with resistance it seems.

I honestly like what I see of Chris and I am not on any bandwagon. With that said, I still find it very odd that he did not get another 1-1. (Assuming RS is correct with his info.) I don't really agree that if she liked him a lot on the first date that she did not need another one with him. 1-1 dates are totally better time spent together than group dates. The norm usually is that the person who gets a date in episode 2 (if they are still there at the time) should get the first of the second set of 1-1's. Nick, Marcus, and Josh all had a second 1-1 after their first and their first dates were after Chris's first 1-1. It is just strange to me. I am not at all saying that Chris cannot be F1 because he totally could! I guess we just need to wait and see. Just some thoughts. Nothing is 100% until we see it with our own eyes.  :cutesmile!: 

There is info from RS that doesn't jive so am keeping my mind open. Like for example, what's happened with JJ's date and the tweeted pic we have. It's not jiving either. Somehow, I think RS has some dates mixed up or wrong completely so will keep an eye on that.

Alanna wrote:I think the info must be wrong, why/how could Nick get two 1:1s in a row? I guess maybe Nick is the F1 and Andi threw a fit that he needed the second 1:1 in a row or something otherwise it really makes no sense.

Agreed - I think there's wrong/missing info re Chris for sure.