Re: Catherine & Sean Tweets/Facebook Updates - Thread #17

[lipsis]

Is this a new pic of Sean. Quite beefy!

@GrahamBunn: Loving the support from seanloweksu in our Curable T in support of Pediatric Cancer Research… http://t.co/IKLMQpnlnd

Not new. Sean put it up on his IG 26 weeks ago.

[smartcat]

 Just got home from a business lunch and thought I would check in to see what's new. (Not obessed by adorable Seancat or anything.) I'm happy to see that many of you, Lucas 15, Iploeg, Pinkflowers, are agreeing with the out there thought that Sean and Catherine might have secretly tied the knot. Then Pinkflowers came up with a thoughtful scenerio that if they may have said their promises to each other in a house of God and they may be waiting for the licence and the legal stuff for the big ABC wedding.
Another thought popped into my love obsessed Seancat dream. Remember everyone they spent 2 weeks in Dallas and although everything wedding related is hush hush, I'm sure you could trust a Dad who's a pastor or a Grandpa whos a pastor to seal the deal with those vows of togetherness in front of God and keep a secret.
If this thinking keeps up I may have to use my imagination to write a Sean and Catherine novel

[lipsis]

And let's not forget they will be in Vegas this weekend! Woot!

:con1:

[smartcat]

 Good point Lipsis

[lipsis]

I think just for fun they need to take a picture of themselves in front of one of the Vegas wedding chapels just to throw twitter and IG into a tizzy! #funwithfans. :con1:

[Lucas15]

But if they had married already, there would be a marriage license somewhere that would have been leaked to the press.

Yes there would be records but that doesn't mean that the records would be public; for example in California:

http://www.cdph.ca.gov/certlic/birthdeathmar/Pages/TypesofMarriageLicenses.aspx

Confidential Marriage License:

The participating parties must be at least 18 years old to apply for a confidential marriage license. Minors may NOT purchase a confidential marriage license.

The participating parties must be living together as spouses at the time they apply for the marriage license, and must sign an affidavit on the license attesting to those facts.

The couple MUST be married in the county where the license is issued.

No witnesses are required to be at the ceremony, AND no witnesses sign on the marriage license.

The marriage license is a confidential record and is registered at the County Clerk’s Office in the county where it was purchased. Only the couple may purchase copies of the marriage license and must present valid picture identification together with the required fee to the County Clerk in order to do so. Persons other than the married couple requesting copies of a confidential marriage license may only do so by presenting a court order to the County Clerk in the county where the license is registered.

Copies of confidential marriages are not available from the state office.

[landrje]

But if they had married already, there would be a marriage license somewhere that would have been leaked to the press.

you'd think so, wouldn't you? BUT ... here now is a little known fact about the State of California that only the peruser's of this forum will know: in California, there exists the option of making your marriage license confidential (that's not a misprint, I said CONFIDENTIAL)  :shocked!:

no lie, and I'm not even kidding!  :Biggrin: 

Here - straight from the California Dept of Public Health - is how a couple can keep their marriage license safe from the preying eyes of the public (or the evil eyes of the press, for that matter):

The participating parties must be at least 18 years old to apply for a confidential marriage license. Minors may NOT purchase a confidential marriage license.

The participating parties must be living together as spouses at the time they apply for the marriage license, and must sign an affidavit on the license attesting to those facts.

The couple MUST be married in the county where the license is issued.

No witnesses are required to be at the ceremony, AND no witnesses sign on the marriage license.

The marriage license is a confidential record and is registered at the County Clerk’s Office in the county where it was purchased. Only the couple may purchase copies of the marriage license and must present valid picture identification together with the required fee to the County Clerk in order to do so. Persons other than the married couple requesting copies of a confidential marriage license may only do so by presenting a court order to the County Clerk in the county where the license is registered.

Copies of confidential marriages are not available from the state office.

so there you have it ... if SeanCat wanted to get married and wanted nobody else to know, that can be accomplished in California, where they just happen to have been conveniently residing for these past several months ...   

makes you go "hmmmmm" doesn't it?

now I'm not sayin' that SeanCat knew/know this about California, or that they exercised their right to get married in California confidentially (quick, somebody tell them about this alternative), but there's at least a chance someone did tell SeanCat about this provision in California law and a chance they followed through with a confidential marriage and are thus living together as husband and wife right now, and are in the throes of planning a nice, big, lavish public ceremony for all of us to watch on ABC someday soon
                                                  

on edit: Lucas, you're goooooood ... glad to see great minds think alike

[umngirl]

I think just for fun they need to take a picture of themselves in front of one of the Vegas wedding chapels just to throw twitter and IG into a tizzy!  #funwithfans.   :con1:

I say they do this just to mess with people. The reactions would be priceless, Price. Less.

[lipsis]

I think just for fun they need to take a picture of themselves in front of one of the Vegas wedding chapels just to throw twitter and IG into a tizzy!  #funwithfans.   :con1:

I say they do this just to mess with people. The reactions would be priceless, Price. Less.

Exactly. Just think of the endless entertainment we would have here mocking the tweets and comments!
Oops! Me bad!

[umngirl]

I think just for fun they need to take a picture of themselves in front of one of the Vegas wedding chapels just to throw twitter and IG into a tizzy!  #funwithfans.   :con1:

I say they do this just to mess with people. The reactions would be priceless, Price. Less.

Exactly. Just think of the endless entertainment we would have here mocking the tweets and comments!
Oops! Me bad!

:bad girl: clap3 

If people are crazy with the constant wedding questions now, just imagine after they did this.

[lipsis]

I think just for fun they need to take a picture of themselves in front of one of the Vegas wedding chapels just to throw twitter and IG into a tizzy!  #funwithfans.   :con1:

I say they do this just to mess with people. The reactions would be priceless, Price. Less.

Exactly. Just think of the endless entertainment we would have here mocking the tweets and comments!
Oops! Me bad!

:bad girl: clap3 

If people are crazy with the constant wedding questions now, just imagine after they did this.

Which is why they will not do it unless the caption reads something like 'no we didn't '

[umngirl]

I think just for fun they need to take a picture of themselves in front of one of the Vegas wedding chapels just to throw twitter and IG into a tizzy!  #funwithfans.   :con1:

I say they do this just to mess with people. The reactions would be priceless, Price. Less.

Exactly. Just think of the endless entertainment we would have here mocking the tweets and comments!
Oops! Me bad!

:bad girl: clap3 

If people are crazy with the constant wedding questions now, just imagine after they did this.

Which is why they will not do it unless the caption reads something like 'no we didn't '

They're such party poopers. Spoiling all our fun.

[Sponsored content]