Re: Tyler Cameron - Bachelorette 15 - Discussion #2

by Minney Mon Sep 30, 2019 5:59 pm

What a funny topic for a podcast but since I've been involved with bachelor forums since the days of dial up internet I'll admit every group I've belonged to has had this conversation! LOL This isn't so much about the girl who helped create the situation as much as about how the guys deal with it on tv. Meh, not much to get a confident woman upset about. IMO Can you imagine what it's like to be married to an actor doing steamy love scenes on a regular basis? I mostly chuckle remembering how tight Tyler's pants were on the show and just how uncomfortable THAT must have been! giggling

by Tiggerlgh Mon Sep 30, 2019 6:02 pm

I will have to look again and not mentioned here but he also quickly adjusted himself after the backseat make out in the car after hometowns as well. It happens to many of the guys especially by the end of the season. IMO

by Chgohighlife Mon Sep 30, 2019 6:11 pm

Tiggerlgh wrote:@cyessence That reads like Gigi's people again to me. Not surprised. All IMO

@Tiggerigh
This is an amateurish effort in a subpar magazine. Definitely NOT Gigi's people, IMO. Now if you see a short in Vanity Fair, Vogue or even People - that would make sense, IMO. This is just what anyone who understands the celebrity lifestyle would assume. Nothing more or less. All IMO

by Tiggerlgh Mon Sep 30, 2019 6:21 pm

Chgohighlife wrote:
Tiggerlgh wrote:@cyessence That reads like Gigi's people again to me. Not surprised. All IMO

@Tiggerigh
This is an amateurish effort in a subpar magazine. Definitely NOT Gigi's people, IMO. Now if you see a short in Vanity Fair, Vogue or even People - that would make sense, IMO. This is just what anyone who understands the celebrity lifestyle would assume. Nothing more or less. All IMO

The quotes sounded like they could be from her team. Anything to keep her in the news. I could be wrong. There isn't much to it anyway. Nothing I am hanging my hat on either way. I don't think this is an all or nothing relationship. I think it could be a we hang out when we can but may not be exclusive type of thing.

by Chgohighlife Mon Sep 30, 2019 6:49 pm

Tiggerlgh wrote:
Chgohighlife wrote:
Tiggerlgh wrote:@cyessence That reads like Gigi's people again to me. Not surprised. All IMO

@Tiggerigh
This is an amateurish effort in a subpar magazine. Definitely NOT Gigi's people, IMO. Now if you see a short in Vanity Fair, Vogue or even People - that would make sense, IMO. This is just what anyone who understands the celebrity lifestyle would assume. Nothing more or less. All IMO

The quotes sounded like they could be from her team. Anything to keep her in the news. I could be wrong. There isn't much to it anyway. Nothing I am hanging my hat on either way. I don't think this is an all or nothing relationship. I think it could be a we hang out when we can but may not be exclusive type of thing.

No, I disagree. It sounds like statements made here every other day, IMO. Common thoughts, not particularly enlightening for anyone with common sense. All IMO.

by silverstreams Mon Sep 30, 2019 6:57 pm

Tiggerlgh wrote:
Chgohighlife wrote:
Tiggerlgh wrote:@cyessence That reads like Gigi's people again to me. Not surprised. All IMO

@Tiggerigh
This is an amateurish effort in a subpar magazine. Definitely NOT Gigi's people, IMO. Now if you see a short in Vanity Fair, Vogue or even People - that would make sense, IMO. This is just what anyone who understands the celebrity lifestyle would assume. Nothing more or less. All IMO

The quotes sounded like they could be from her team. Anything to keep her in the news. I could be wrong. There isn't much to it anyway. Nothing I am hanging my hat on either way. I don't think this is an all or nothing relationship. I think it could be a we hang out when we can but may not be exclusive type of thing.

That article is bottom of the barrel tabloid fodder. Gigi’s team would not feed a lowly mag like L&S. They report nonsense IMO

by notarose Mon Sep 30, 2019 7:14 pm

^^^
My problem with “source” is that there is no guarantee one actually exists or that said “source” has anything to back up their statement... especially given s/he will not allow themselves to be identified. Anonymous = questionable IMO.

Currently Tyler is giving in-person interviews so no source is required. If a friend of Tyler’s identifies him/herself and gives their POV about any aspect of Tyler’s life I consider that a reliable POV. Ex: Dylan and Mike have both answered Tyler-related questions.
So many times I have witnessed entertainment writers adding in their opinions between actual quotes from a person they had a quick interview with. Between that and ‘source” :thud

by bluwavz Mon Sep 30, 2019 9:01 pm

Roses or Ravens? @LizLoza_FF asked @TylerJCameron3 the tough questions on tonight's #Cover3 pic.twitter.com/A7q2K91Ziu
— Yahoo Sports (@YahooSports) October 1, 2019

by thank goodness Mon Sep 30, 2019 9:29 pm

Maybe tyler and gigi talked about the show since gigi is known him being bachelorette not in person. At first they had to talk about the show definitely asking what was behind story or funny story kind of things. Tyler said funny way not romantically in the podcast and tyler also said other interviews saying we have all past.
He also mentioned he was coney on the show so he covered with blanket on his face . Maybe he can talk now because he is over completely with bachelorette experience.
I don’t know why he has done this interview but If he did one month ago it might be really messy because gigi and hannah things.
Now I guess all good so he can talk freely without pressure .
I don’t know maybe ABC’ s decision since he has obligation with them.
But I do think he didn’t interview things are nothing to do with gigi.
They are just dating not working related to. Working are agencies thing.
Anyway tyler also can see gigi’s ex photos almost everyday since people tag to him even very intimate photos since their first date.

by dee Mon Sep 30, 2019 10:11 pm

Thanks for the updates @bluwavz!

So, is Tyler going to be part of the Cover 3 feature of Yahoo Sports more semi-permanently? At the end of the posted video, the host asks Tyler, "Would you like to hang out with us in Cover 3? [...using your unique perspective to talk about the league]". Was that suppose to be an invitation to future episodes of the show? In the Ringers podcast, he mentioned keeping up with NFL as he's working with Yahoo Sports now. I wasn't sure if that was a one-time thing or he got a gig with them. If the latter, that's pretty exciting news for him! Wonder if he would have to make more LA trips as I think the main studio is LA-based.

by Guest Mon Sep 30, 2019 10:38 pm

dee wrote:Thanks for the updates @bluwavz!

So, is Tyler going to be part of the Cover 3 feature of Yahoo Sports more semi-permanently? At the end of the posted video, the host asks Tyler, "Would you like to hang out with us in Cover 3? [...using your unique perspective to talk about the league]". Was that suppose to be an invitation to future episodes of the show? In the Ringers podcast, he mentioned keeping up with NFL as he's working with Yahoo Sports now. I wasn't sure if that was a one-time thing or he got a gig with them. If the latter, that's pretty exciting news for him! Wonder if he would have to make more LA trips as I think the main studio is LA-based.

Looks like he will be a regular or semi reg correspondant. YahooSports HQs are IN NYC so it's a good gig for him.

by dee Mon Sep 30, 2019 10:52 pm

@seton Thanks for clarifying. I was kind of confused. I know this particular shot of the Cover 3 feature was filmed in NYC. I wasn't sure if the NYC location was a permanent thing because the host seems to be in LA at the Yahoo Playa Vista filming her regular segment. Tyler's little cameo with the other male host for The Rush of Yahoo Sports was also filmed at the Yahoo Playa Vista building too. But if they have multiple offices (with one in NYC), I guess they can film at any location as YahooSports content seems to be all digital anyway.

by Sponsored content