Peter Kraus - Bachelorette 13 - **Sleuthing Spoilers** - #8

I kind of feel like I won the Bach "lottery" (least beneficial lottery ever ) since I like all 4 guys in Rachel's F4 - I'm actually interested and intrigued by all of them as well and that's never happened before. IMO Peter would be the hottest Bachelor they have had and I'm all for it (if the 2nd spoiler is correct)

Ladybug82 wrote:

Cila51290 wrote:Is this the Peter snark thread or sleuthing thread?  

Both since it's a general discussion thread.  

Nah, to me it just seems like more snarks happen in this particular thread than sleuthing, IMO. I don't mind, but it's just what I've observed.

Can the mods create a Snark thread for Peter? Didn't we have one for Andi at one point? Sometimes I want to post on this thread for sleuthing but the amount of snark really is confusing at times. JMO

At this point in time, things are fine the way they are. Thanks.

If you have a problem with what is being posted, that is what the fan threads are for JMO

The biggest reason that I don't believe Peter is f1 is he seems always in Madison, occasionally in Chicago. When is SHV for him? I don't believe Rachel always goes to him either.  What happened to a fiancé who really loves her but can't even take time off for her? Seems very strange to me, if he's f1.
If there's a strong proof, sm sighting witouht pictures doesn't count, imo,  he's away for a couple of days when Rachel is also unaccounted for then I think I will be more inclined to believe he's f1.

Cila51290 wrote:

Ladybug82 wrote:

Cila51290 wrote:Is this the Peter snark thread or sleuthing thread?  

Both since it's a general discussion thread.  

Nah, to me it just seems like more snarks happen in this particular thread than sleuthing, IMO. I don't mind, but it's just what I've observed.

Can the mods create a Snark thread for Peter? Didn't we have one for Andi at one point? Sometimes I want to post on this thread for sleuthing but the amount of snark really is confusing at times. JMO

 

Sleuth away.

I'm not talking directly to you when I say this, There are 8 threads for Peter that I can say 75% is fanning. Every time some tried to sleuth they were called out for being snarky when they were only trying to sleuth. If my opinion is that he is not into Rachel, he hardly touches her, I'm sent a pm being accused of being a hater. Sometimes negative posts which are a direct result of sleuthing is referred to as snark. That's not the case.

I was looking for something the other day, went through 32 pages of fanning, I gave up, and that was one thread.

We will make some changes next season. The purpose of this forum is to sleuth, which includes opinions, positive negative snark. Both F1-F2 have had their share of snark. Feel free to sleuth in any thread that is titled Sleuthing and Spoilers.

sdmom wrote:The biggest reason that I don't believe Peter is f1 is he seems always in Madison, occasionally in Chicago. When is SHV for him? I don't believe Rachel always goes to him either.  What happened to a fiancé who really loves her but can't even take time off for her? Seems very strange to me, if he's f1.
If there's a strong proof, sm sighting witouht pictures doesn't count, imo,  he's away for a couple of days when Rachel is also unaccounted for then I think I will be more inclined to believe he's f1.

Thanks for continuing to track SD.

I personally don't see how Peter would have had a SHV on any weekend but that's just me. Paticularly the 4th of July weekend.

I'm over thinking that Peter is f1 but find I don't care. I like Rachel so just hope she's happy even if I don't like the guy she's with. I still don't see where Peter's so bad but I feel the same way about Bryan so guess fair's fair.

I'm not saying Peter is bad. I'm saying what I've said all along. He's not into her JMHO. His body language tells me that, time and time again.

He can't act, IMO, because if he was he would be trying to convince viewers that he's head over heels for her, but IMO he's not even doing that. On the contrary he's being honest. If he's not feeling it, he'll let her know. I would have told him to leave at that point in time because it doesn't matter to me now, what he says after this point. The light bulb will I'm sure go off aka Luke Pell, just because it's the performance that's required to be the next bachelor. We have seen it time and time again for both the 'ette and TB IMHO.

He does nothing for me, I've said that from the beginning. He's a good looking model, but not my type at all in looks or personality. However, those opinions don't affect my sleuthing.

sdmom wrote:The biggest reason that I don't believe Peter is f1 is he seems always in Madison, occasionally in Chicago. When is SHV for him? I don't believe Rachel always goes to him either.  What happened to a fiancé who really loves her but can't even take time off for her? Seems very strange to me, if he's f1.
If there's a strong proof, sm sighting witouht pictures doesn't count, imo,  he's away for a couple of days when Rachel is also unaccounted for then I think I will be more inclined to believe he's f1.

This is what seals the deal for me, too. That and the whole body language and non-committal thing. He reminds me so much of Graham and Kiptyn.

albean99 wrote:I'm over thinking that Peter is f1 but find I don't care. I like Rachel so just hope she's happy even if I don't like the guy she's with. I still don't see where Peter's so bad but I feel the same way about Bryan so guess fair's fair.

What's problematic for me is that I see the connection (just like Des and Chris) between Peter and Rachel as being much stronger than the other relationships but it's the SM/SHV just doesn't appear to jive with what I see playing out on my tv screen. Very perplexing.

Has anyone sleuthed or posted the camera shots of the limo exits of the guys, or mostly Peter and Bryan compared to other seasons?