Bachelorette 13 - Rachel Lindsay - SM Media - *Sleuthing Spoilers* Discussion - #6

realitytvfan11 wrote:

This was a great and super fun interview.

Thank you for posting the video Here are 2 things that I found interesting :

- She said that during the MTP dates her sisters was tough and then she correct herself and says actually only my older sister, which made me wondering if she was talking about Peter's MTP ? And not the other one. I'll sure watch who was there during both of their MTP

- She also said that she watch the episodes because then she has to explain to her fiancé what was happening. I forgot that the F1 has to watch other relationships unfold, it must be a hard time for the couple. Even if he knew what he signed up for imo, when you love someone, it can be difficult. So hang in there Peter You're the chosen one after all (imo)

Anyway, really fun interview

Oh and @brownravens - ITA with you

TLTF wrote:

realitytvfan11 wrote:

This was a great and super fun interview.

Thank you for posting the video Here are 2 things that I found interesting :

- She said that during the MTP dates her sisters was tough and then she correct herself and says actually only my older sister, which made me wondering if she was talking about Peter's MTP ? And not the other one. I'll sure watch who was there during both of their MTP

- She also said that she watch the episodes because then she has to explain to her fiancé what was happening. I forgot that the F1 has to watch other relationships unfold, it must be a hard time for the couple. Even if he knew what he signed up for imo, when you love someone, it can be difficult. So hang in there Peter You're the chosen one after all (imo)

Anyway, really fun interview

Oh and @brownravens - ITA with you

Was there a MTP where only one sister was there? What difference would it have made?

where are all the MTP pics? does anyone know?

@Bach/ette  For me if we see that only the older sister was there for Peter it confirms Peter as F1. But this only works if she's only there for one MTP and not both! I don't know if that makes sense. Its hard to express my thoughts in english :/

I think she meant that when the guys were in Dallas to meet her family, her younger sister who lives in Atlanta was not present. Sounded like she was speaking in general.

@TLTF It definitely makes sense. I thought you knew that there was a MTP with only one sister there

Ah non I don't know! @Bach/ette

@BachelorBabe512 yes, you're right. Maybe she was speaking in general! I'll still keep on eye open on that, who knows

Really enjoyed the radio interview, really funny.

"If he has a problem be like hey I'll put you back in traffic you know what Im saying they can bring in another 31 baby dont trip"

" Damn she laugh with me like that"  

brownravens wrote:@Bach/ette yeah i thought the same about the hard for her fiance to see her kiss other people comment too. Given this was on the back of the premiere and she had only kissed Bryan. I thought it implied that he was not her fiance IMO.

Thought the same too, it did slighty come across like that imo, maybe she meant in general or it was a slip up without realizing it.

@Carine I kind of felt like that was a bit of a slip up because the follow up comment was like "but you kissed him the first night right?" and I feel like sort of does a minor correction and goes "right, right" back. - All IMO

@brownravens right before that they were talking about kissing and she mentioned she made out the first night and they asked if it was hard for him to watch and she said yeah that it was hard to for him to watch her kiss other people.. I am thinking a lil slip up there imo.

@Carine Hahaha yeah we're on the same page. I think the conversation was going quite quickly and I think that was tiny slip up. But I think it was an against-Bryan one not a for-Peter one, if that makes any sense!

brownravens wrote:@Carine Hahaha yeah we're on the same page. I think the conversation was going quite quickly and I think that was tiny slip up. But I think it was an against-Bryan one not a for-Peter one, if that makes any sense!

Could you clarify? You're saying you thought it was pro-Peter?