The Bachelorette Australia - Sam Frost - Season 1 - Social Media - Media - #2 *Spoilers - Sleuthing*

Another story by TV Week mag right before Saha's 2nd date.
Sounds like similar stuff to Snez and her ex-husband interview in TV Week.
He's definitely F1, imo.

Sasha article: http://www.tvweeklogieawards.com.au/news/articles/2015/10/bachelorette-sashas-secret-angst/?adbsc=social_20151014_53923916&adbid=654087347630292992&adbpl=tw&adbpr=20644420

I don't invest too much in what Osher says as he has been known to contradict himself when speaking about The Bachelor in the past. He also said that Sam Wood didn't meet Eve during the show when he clearly did!

In this interview he is saying he has a great poker face, but has previously said he doesn't. I just think he is trying to misdirect so that he doesn't give anything away - regardless of who actually wins.

I also just think that Osher made the 'love wins' comment to highlight that no person is a 'winner' and to downplay the view (by some) that it is a competition which guy wins. Don't think he was referring to any particular guy at all.

But he did give it away in that other interview about Heather leaving - he hid his face and said he didn't want his face to give it away.
Then when Dan said Snez in a wedding dress Osher hid his face again and said he didn't want his face to give anything away.

So both times when what was said was "correct and true" (Heather did leave and Snez did win) Osher hid his face.

He didn't do that with F&W talking about Richie. I think he would hide his face if there was truth to Richie winning.

in_denial wrote:I also just think that Osher made the 'love wins' comment to highlight that no person is a 'winner' and to downplay the view (by some) that it is a competition which guy wins. Don't think he was referring to any particular guy at all.

I agree. But it still stands that the question being asked about the person winning when Osher says this is NOT the winner so far. Obviously if Richie wins then this is a moot point but if Richie doesn't win then this is a tell of Osher's, even if it also means he is just talking in terms of it not being a competition.

I see it as both things (Osher not being a competition but also a "tell") is what I mean.

Or he may just be more conscious of not giving anything else away?

Still, I don't think it is 'proof' as such that Richie hasn't won. It's hard when you can't see the person's face - I would need to see Osher's face to know more.

I don't think it is proof. But the fact that Osher never "hid" his face like he did with Heather leaving (it was true) and Snez winning (it was true) is what stands out to me. I still think there's a slim chance it is Richie but won't be surprised if it is not.

The pic on the page before this is Osher's poker face at that moment.

Thanks - I didn't see the picture. Would have loved to see video footage of this!

Me too :/

While the others are conducting interviews Richie is MIA.

I wonder if he refused to do interviews or he wasn't asked. I would love to hear him on the radio!

Given how they promoted his SD without doing interviews indicates to me he's not F1.

On the other hand Sasha is addressing allegations etc via the media. :Nod:

It is what it is!

Michael is also addressing allegations and is using the same wording/statements as Sasha.

As for Richie being MIA - who knows? Maybe he is busy out on a rope somewhere (working)? :cutesmile!:

ElonM wrote:While the others are conducting interviews Richie is MIA.

I wonder if he refused to do interviews or he wasn't asked.  I would love to hear him on the radio!

Given how they promoted his SD without doing interviews indicates to me he's not F1.

On the other hand Sasha is addressing allegations etc via the media.  :Nod:

It is what it is!

Richie is MIA. I was just thinking the same thing. Posts that picture of him and the older man and then nada. We don't even know if the picture was current. The hair was darker and he seemed thinner (but that may just be me thinking this)