Tweet/Facebook Updates - Bachelorette 8 - Discussion

Ahhh, what a sweet guy!

"Constantine Tzortzis

I'm looking forward to tonight's episode of #Bachelorette. I always knew going into the show that I would hit a moral cross roads at the offer of fantasy suites. Please understand, I'm not Saint or immune to temptation but I knew that the eyes of my family would be on me and how I handled such a pressure situation. I decided that if by this point I was in love and saw a future I would forgo the suite (regardless of what does or doesn't happen off camera) and explain that if our love was real than I wished for our intimacy to play out on our own personal terms and a rose from Ashley would signify that. Being that neither of us had fallen for one another at this point beyond friendship I knew it was best for me to bow out as graceful as possible. My number one concern was to maintain my family, friends, and Ashley's respect. I don't expect any surprises along these lines tonight but you never know....

iamreal2u wrote:

kashoo wrote:

Bloven wrote:I read Emily and Jef are tweeting?!! Not each other but I can't find anything. Anyone confirm this?

40 mins ago
Emily Maynard ‏@EmilyMaynard
You guys are always asking me about my clothes/makeup so nows your chance to get answers! @Instyle ‪#AskEmilyMaynard‬ http://news.instyle.com/2012/07/09/wha …


2 hours ago
jefholm RETWEET
People Water ‏@PeopleWater
Tonight: Will Emily offer Jef the fantasy suite? And if so... Will Jef make Emily's fantasy sweet? Hmmmm ‪#jertweet‬

This is weird for a F1 to retweet. To me it seems a little disrespectful. IMHO

And it doesn't to me ... I find the People Water tweet (and retweet) both cute and clever!

Finley wrote:

Tiggerlgh wrote:

allykat wrote:

just logic wrote:

Tiggerlgh wrote:I can't wait until we find out what MF is talking about for sure.

I wonder if RS reached out to a WB employee unknowingly or something for spoiler for tonight's show.

I'm wondering if the 'no fantasy suite for Arie' was a set-up to get RS to print something he'll be proven wrong for?

Would MF be this excited just about a bad spoiler for FS? It might end up being wrong, but I think he's excited about a bigger end game. Like it helped to flush out the leak and/or RS got the info from someone under contract.

I was thinking because of that information MF was able to find the source of the leak, not the leak itself. You know put 10 slightly different stories out there, one shows up you know who spread it.

How very Tyrion Lannister of him!

Excellent reference! And I agree with the above - maybe he figured out the leak based on some misinformation he attempted to spread.

Yikes, did you see the last tweet from MF. Just says "my lawyers are so happy"

He must have sold proof RS is in breach of contract. He must have contacted a contestant. The contract never said he wasnt allowed to spoil

Bloven wrote:Yikes, did you see the last tweet from MF. Just says "my lawyers are so happy"

He must have sold proof RS is in breach of contract. He must have contacted a contestant. The contract never said he wasnt allowed to spoil

I thought RS was also not allowed to contact cast/crew members.

just logic wrote:

Bloven wrote:Yikes, did you see the last tweet from MF. Just says "my lawyers are so happy"

He must have sold proof RS is in breach of contract. He must have contacted a contestant. The contract never said he wasnt allowed to spoil

I thought RS was also not allowed to contact cast/crew members.

Is cast members not allowed to contact him? I know RS is a jerk but Mike Fleiss is a bigger jerk.

michelle1109 wrote:I wonder if he had RS served with papers for a lawsuit in CA since RS has ben in CA? I don't know how that works...but the tweets are interesting for sure.

Yes, maybe RS saying he brought his spoiler notes to CA constitues doing business in CA? IDK

nonnie wrote:

just logic wrote:

Bloven wrote:Yikes, did you see the last tweet from MF. Just says "my lawyers are so happy"

He must have sold proof RS is in breach of contract. He must have contacted a contestant. The contract never said he wasnt allowed to spoil

I thought RS was also not allowed to contact cast/crew members.

Is cast members not allowed to contact him? I know RS is a jerk but Mike Fleiss is a bigger jerk.

They can contact him from what I understand

pavalygurl wrote:

michelle1109 wrote:I wonder if he had RS served with papers for a lawsuit in CA since RS has ben in CA? I don't know how that works...but the tweets are interesting for sure.

Yes, maybe RS saying he brought his spoiler notes to CA constitues doing business in CA? IDK

oooooooohhhh maybe!! He also did his last post from CA! I think the law goes by IP address as far as that goes

pavalygurl wrote:

michelle1109 wrote:I wonder if he had RS served with papers for a lawsuit in CA since RS has ben in CA? I don't know how that works...but the tweets are interesting for sure.

Yes, maybe RS saying he brought his spoiler notes to CA constitues doing business in CA? IDK

I think you may have NAILED it, pavalygurl!

@fleissmeister
Agreements should not be violated... :) this is gonna be huge fin!!!

Not a lot of ambiguity there.

Leavitka wrote:

pavalygurl wrote:

michelle1109 wrote:I wonder if he had RS served with papers for a lawsuit in CA since RS has ben in CA? I don't know how that works...but the tweets are interesting for sure.

Yes, maybe RS saying he brought his spoiler notes to CA constitues doing business in CA? IDK

I think you may have NAILED it, pavalygurl!

If I am correct, Hey, lots of help here. Team effort.

ETA Michelle 1109 deserves the credit...she said maybe they served papers since RS was in CA...that got me thinking did he do business while here.